Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I really wasn't planning on spending my senior years under a new form of government- [View all]silvershadow
(10,336 posts)91. Wow. That's a keeper. Looks like from original DU? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I really wasn't planning on spending my senior years under a new form of government- [View all]
silvershadow
May 2016
OP
Which is fine and dandy, but has nothing to do with the OP. Whatsoever. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#11
This has zero to do with gays or any other issue. It has to due with our form of government.
silvershadow
May 2016
#37
Our "form" of government has not changed in the past 50 years, so try again.
politicaljunkie41910
May 2016
#71
The TPP. I remember a few months ago when it was still ok to discuss that here. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#73
So since when does discussing the TPP get you banned from DU? That's the problem with
politicaljunkie41910
May 2016
#75
It's not because I am a Bernie supporter. It's because I am a proud Union labor man. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#76
Nice deflection. The OP isn't about 50 years ago, as you well know. It is about our form of
silvershadow
May 2016
#44
You didn't even read the OP it is clear. I am not pining for 50 years ago. But you knew that.
silvershadow
May 2016
#49
That's the standard? "Hey, at least you didn't get shot in the head?" Wow. Crazy stuff there. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#56
No, you picked the 60's rather than the topic of the OP. I just responded, unnecessarily. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#58
Thats right and their followers were picked up in the middle of the night
workinclasszero
May 2016
#143
Indeed, up until just recently marriage has been a sacred bond between a man and a woman
Fumesucker
May 2016
#114
Why parse it? Civil rights are ongoing. A piece of a much bigger puzzle. Human rights are better but
snowy owl
May 2016
#121
America is heading back more than 50 years, more like 100+ years to oligarchic plutocratic
Dont call me Shirley
May 2016
#28
If Hillary wins by hook or by crook, you will no doubt find yourself on America's first bullet train
NorthCarolina
May 2016
#10
Pre Roe v Wade, gays forced in the closet, civil rights for nobody but white males.
PeaceNikki
May 2016
#15
And I never said any such thing. Your mind has taken you astray. Stay on topic, please. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#20
My OP. My topic. Your diversion. Democracy vs Cororatacracy. No contest. At all. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#22
I made my point. We've had a ton of progressive victories in the past 50 years.
PeaceNikki
May 2016
#26
The corporacracy is happy to give us social victories, just as long as they gain further
silvershadow
May 2016
#30
You're very dishonest. The perfect Hillary drone...deny the truth and twist the words to define
haikugal
May 2016
#77
In the last several years the PTB have stolen my house, $80k in payments, and
silvershadow
May 2016
#84
Social repression in the Union labor movement? That takes some big balls. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#127
You're not familiar with the role of many unions in keeping black workers off shop floors?
Recursion
May 2016
#128
There you go again, talking about the 1960's...Can we just talk about 1992 and later? nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#129
Lame. Deflective. You no longer have the same form of government, which as you know
silvershadow
May 2016
#131
Remember in 1992 When the Clintons continued the Republican tradition of destroying
silvershadow
May 2016
#54
I don't want to compare anything. You do. Way off topic. But you knew that. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#60
I want to compare this form of government to democracy, yes. The TPP and all else, as you
silvershadow
May 2016
#70
President Eisenhower warned the nation about the influence of the military industrial complex 1961
Fresh_Start
May 2016
#62
Yep. And corporations were declared to have the same rights as people as early as 1886.
ContinentalOp
May 2016
#93
Yes they do. You are welcome. Thank you for weighing in with the vote of confidence. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#80
Great post. I will pour over it as soon as I eat my supper. Thanks for the kind words. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#98
your OP has been hi-jacked, triangulated, and suffered from way too many deflective responses...
islandmkl
May 2016
#96
bad premise - all wages across all races have stagnated...and you know it's not about
islandmkl
May 2016
#125
Negative. African Americans have seen significant income gains over the past 40 years
Recursion
May 2016
#126
The party is like Mitt Romney bought it and stripped it of its' valuable assets.
silvershadow
May 2016
#101
Absolutely not. I'm solidly middle class because I could get an college education without debt.
snowy owl
May 2016
#122
Lack of institutional memory. Study Eisenhower in fifties. It is different. Few seem to know it.
snowy owl
May 2016
#120