2016 Postmortem

COLGATE4

(14,886 posts)

31. You forgot to mention how she

Reply to catnhatnh (Reply #21)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:00 PM

May 2016

killed Vince Foster.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

112 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Well It's Official: Hillary Has Been Exonerated for Everything She Ever Said or Done! [View all] Chasstev365 May 2016 OP

Exorhated? The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #1

Good so now we can move on to something important like beating doc03 May 2016 #2

We have to let people vote still. TimPlo May 2016 #39

To do what? Vote for the TPP? Nahhh I'll pass Jack Bone May 2016 #77

LIke the Congress we had in 2006 and 2008 that never passed a public option, EFCA, merrily May 2016 #81

Welcome to Democratic Underground where the GOP works daily to Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #3

Seriously! nt nolawarlock May 2016 #22

She's going to get us GOP money. 840high May 2016 #64

I see these newcomers constantly pushing Republican talking points doc03 May 2016 #4

I have voted Democratic in every election since 1980, thank you very much! Chasstev365 May 2016 #7

Why in the hell are you carrying water for Republicans then. doc03 May 2016 #9

Why are you shilling for a Republican candidate? pdsimdars May 2016 #17

That graphic is misleading right out of the gate. nolawarlock May 2016 #23

That's some abusive Hill Bro tag line you've got there, nolawarlock. senz May 2016 #48

+1 Nailed it. merrily May 2016 #59

You mean Stockholm Willy? nolawarlock May 2016 #63

Thanks for proving senz's point. merrily May 2016 #84

All I'm proving is that racism is alive and well with the defense of WillyT on this site. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #88

But you are not posting to WillyT, are you? Nor can you. You posted to senz. merrily May 2016 #89

... who in turn was defending people like (and including) WillyT. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #90

I call bs. Kindly quote the language in the post of senz to which you replied that defended WillyT. merrily May 2016 #91

Post #86. nolawarlock May 2016 #92

Nice try. Post 86 is not the post to which your Post 63 replied and we're discussing your Reply 63. merrily May 2016 #93

I'm not just discussing post #63. nolawarlock May 2016 #94

You know 63 comes before 86 right? merrily May 2016 #95

Yes, I do. nolawarlock May 2016 #96

Except for acknowledging that you were wrong in Reply 63, Reply 96 is a convoluted rationalization. merrily May 2016 #97

As I just explained above ... nolawarlock May 2016 #100

did you get tired? nolawarlock May 2016 #103

Poster, please. You're not the only poster on the board right now. Get over yourself. merrily May 2016 #105

Games? nolawarlock May 2016 #106

And it probably also bears mentioning ... nolawarlock May 2016 #98

Don't get it twisted. The only discussions I've had with you related to your Reply 63. merrily May 2016 #99

On the contrary, nolawarlock May 2016 #101

Luckily for me, most who read at DU can follow a conversation and a subthread and can recognize your merrily May 2016 #102

You don't need to waste your time on someone like that, merrily. senz May 2016 #107

Hey! I can enjoy exposing someone like that for what he or she is. merrily May 2016 #109

Well, I'm glad you enjoy it. senz May 2016 #111

Well, to a point. And I did learn about another new DU poster with a lot of hides already, so merrily May 2016 #112

No, not that nice man. Another nice man named L0oniX. senz May 2016 #86

Are you saying that WillyT is a nice racist? nolawarlock May 2016 #87

Racist? I never ever saw any sign of racism in WillyT. senz May 2016 #104

Have a lovely day. nolawarlock May 2016 #108

This message was self-deleted by its author merrily May 2016 #57

I've been voting straight Democratic since the 1960s senz May 2016 #15

Who does TRUMP remind you of? calguy May 2016 #27

Somebody Bernie can beat -- easily. senz May 2016 #41

On the internet... Databuser May 2016 #55

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan nt BootinUp May 2016 #5

OK-Sniper Fire catnhatnh May 2016 #20

I understand why you think you proved something, but it really BootinUp May 2016 #25

Yeah, it says catnhatnh can remember her lies. senz May 2016 #49

Accepting for arguments sake that it was a bald face lie BootinUp May 2016 #54

Bernie has never "fleeced" anyone, because he's not interested in money senz May 2016 #110

So what's it say? TM99 May 2016 #53

When someone can look at one confusing case and draw a ridiculously BootinUp May 2016 #56

There was no fucking confusion about that sniper fire lie. TM99 May 2016 #58

Her record in public life, the obvious trust BootinUp May 2016 #61

Massive logical fallacy. merrily May 2016 #65

No all that says is TM99 May 2016 #72

I am referring to people she has formed a relationship with BootinUp May 2016 #74

Now, it's even more of a fallacy. merrily May 2016 #79

You go on relying on the bits and pieces you BootinUp May 2016 #82

Um, no. That's another or your fallacies. Her life on the record is exactly what I do rely upon. merrily May 2016 #83

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #80

+1 merrily May 2016 #66

Poster, please. Nothing about being handed flowers by a child on arrival is confusing. merrily May 2016 #60

Nah - she lied. Period. 840high May 2016 #67

Due to Trump and the possibly of Ted Cruz as Attorney General, I will vote for Hillary no matter wh Chasstev365 May 2016 #6

If you're REALLY worried, then you'd be supporting the candidate who performs better against them pdsimdars May 2016 #18

They've been making the same baseless, unconvincing arguments for a year. merrily May 2016 #68

yes but Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #69

So, because of all this wasted time and effort and money, finding NO wrong, you are pissed at who? seabeyond May 2016 #8

No "intent to mishandle" found. Unfortunately, there are other factors. pat_k May 2016 #24

You mean there's STILL A CHANCE????? COLGATE4 May 2016 #26

Unfortunately, yes. Not much of one, but "not insignificant." (nt) pat_k May 2016 #28

Why don't you get how desperately unethical this sounds? seabeyond May 2016 #34

If "unethical" tell it to the law professor quoted in Rolling Stone. pat_k May 2016 #42

You didn't see the movie? COLGATE4 May 2016 #46

No. Found the scene when I googled "still a chance" tho. pat_k May 2016 #47

Seriously? Like a dog diggin for a bone, a repug clawing away at Benghazi. Pathetic. seabeyond May 2016 #33

I don't consider Rolling Stone a repub rag. pat_k May 2016 #43

Not again... is the rightwing forum over at Free Republic offline? nt procon May 2016 #10

WHOOO HOOOO, GOOD NEWS!!!!! Grassy Knoll May 2016 #11

The skies have opened, Mike__M May 2016 #12

Jury results ---> Petrushka May 2016 #13

Good grief. 99Forever May 2016 #14

This is truly a joke. It's the Bernie supporters who have no objectivity. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #16

Hey as long as it is found 'legal' TM99 May 2016 #19

"Hillary Clinton-Avoiding Indictment since 1978" catnhatnh May 2016 #21

You forgot to mention how she COLGATE4 May 2016 #31

You know how I judge a Clinton scandal? catnhatnh May 2016 #40

Believing in the principle that, in order to convict a person COLGATE4 May 2016 #29

Be a good German TM99 May 2016 #32

Now THAT's funny. Calling the principle of innocence COLGATE4 May 2016 #36

You appear to be well educated TM99 May 2016 #38

I hope your don't hurt too much COLGATE4 May 2016 #44

That should be a hide. seabeyond May 2016 #37

And we were right. ucrdem May 2016 #30

ok Joob May 2016 #35

Yep. Your disapproval is going to really mean a lot to her COLGATE4 May 2016 #45

Like I said, Incompetence. Joob May 2016 #50

People like you have been predicting her 'downfall' for the past COLGATE4 May 2016 #71

Didn't realize so many young voters, a whole generation, saw her as corrupted 30 years ago. Joob May 2016 #73

Actually, most young people then as now were smart enough to COLGATE4 May 2016 #75

What RW bull shit are you referring too? Joob May 2016 #76

She is the most investigated woman in history... scscholar May 2016 #51

Don't you wonder why? Why do the Clintons 840high May 2016 #70

Am agreeing with you over here. bjo59 May 2016 #52

Clinton's defense has morphed to: She broke the law, but she didn't understand that law. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #62

Oh, stop making stuff up. You sound silly. riversedge May 2016 #78

Her main problem is all of that pesky saying and doing things. ContinentalOp May 2016 #85