Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
97. October Surprise + Safari Club = CIA Old Boys in Power For Ever and Ever
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:17 PM
May 2016

For those who may not remember even a time before Reagan:

As part of the October Surprise, Poppy Bush and Bill Casey worked their Old School ties at CIA and Wall Street to do in the career of President Jimmy Carter.



From...

The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld

By Prof Peter Dale Scott
Global Research, March 10, 2014
The Asia-Pacific Journal, Volume 12, Issue 10, No. 5

EXCERPT...

The Safari Club Milieu: George H.W. Bush, Theodore Shackley, and BCCI

The usual account of this super-agency’s origin is that it was

the brainchild of Count Alexandre de Marenches, the debonair and mustachioed chief of France’s CIA. The SDECE (Service de Documentation Extérieure et de Contre-Espionnage)…. Worried by Soviet and Cuban advances in postcolonial Africa, and by America’s post-Watergate paralysis in the field of undercover activity, the swashbuckling Marenches had come to Turki’s father, King Faisal, with a proposition…. [By 1979] Somali president Siad Barre had been bribed out of Soviet embrace by $75 million worth of Egyptian arms (paid for… by Saudi Arabia)….95

Joseph Trento adds that “The Safari Club needed a network of banks to finance its intelligence operations,… With the official blessing of George Bush as the head of the CIA, Adham transformed… the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), into a worldwide money-laundering machine.”.96

Trento claims also that the Safari Club then was able to work with some of the controversial CIA operators who were then forced out of the CIA by Turner, and that this was coordinated by perhaps the most controversial of them all: Theodore Shackley.

Shackley, who still had ambitions to become DCI, believed that without his many sources and operatives like [Edwin] Wilson, the Safari Club—operating with [former DCI Richard] Helms in charge in Tehran—would be ineffective. … Unless Shackley took direct action to complete the privatization of intelligence operations soon, the Safari Club would not have a conduit to [CIA] resources. The solution: create a totally private intelligence network using CIA assets until President Carter could be replaced.97

Kevin Phillips has suggested that Bush on leaving the CIA had dealings with the bank most closely allied with Safari Club operations: the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). In Phillips’ words,

[font color="green"]After leaving the CIA in January 1977, Bush became chairman of the executive committee of First International Bancshares and its British subsidiary, where, according to journalists Peter Truell and Larry Gurwin in their 1992 book ‘False Profits’ [p. 345], Bush ‘traveled on the bank’s behalf and sometimes marketed to international banks in London, including several Middle Eastern institutions.[/font color]

Joseph Trento adds that through the London branch of this bank, which Bush chaired, “Adham’s petrodollars and BCCI money flowed for a variety of intelligence operations”99

It is clear moreover that BCCI operations, like Khashoggi’s before them, were marked by the ability to deal behind the scenes with both the Arab countries and also Israel.100

[font color="green"]It is clear that for years the American deep state in Washington was both involved with and protected BCCI. Acting CIA director Richard Kerr acknowledged to a Senate Committee “that the CIA had also used BCCI for certain intelligence-gathering operations.”101[/font color]

[font color="red"]Later, a congressional inquiry showed that for more than ten years preceding the BCCI collapse in the summer of 1991, the FBI, the DEA, the CIA, the Customs Service, and the Department of Justice all failed to act on hundreds of tips about the illegalities of BCCI’s international activities.102[/font color]

Far less clear is the attitude taken by Wall Street banks towards the miscreant BCCI. The Senate report on BCCI charged however that the Bank of England “had withheld information about BCCI’s frauds from public knowledge for 15 months before closing the bank.”103

CONTINUED...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-state-the-deep-state-and-the-wall-street-overworld/5372843



From there, Ronnie was set for the role of a lifetime, what was supposed to be a bit part extended.



Through a Glass Darkly

Alexander Cockburn
Lies Of Our Times (p. 12-13)
November 1991

What was surprising to me was Reagan’s condition. He was exhausted to the point of incoherence throughout much ofthe interview and could not remember the substance of any subject that had been discussed apart from Mitterrand’s expression of anticommunism. I had not seen Reagan at such close rangesince the assassination attempt nearly four months earlier, and was shocked at his condition.... Reagan simply was unable to recall the contents of the talks in which he had just participated.... The interview concluded at a signal from Deaver,who did not seem to find the president’s condition unusual.”

Thus ran Lou Cannon’s recollections of an interview with the Commander-in-Chief in 1981, as set forth in his book President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime (New York: Simon & Schuster,1991), published earlier this year. But how did Cannon describe Reagan’s condition to the readers of the Washington Post when he wrote up his interview? In the July 23, 1981, Washington Post,Cannon’s story appeared under the headline “Reagan Describes Summit Meeting as ‘Worth Its Weight in Gold.’ ” Cannon’s report gives the impression of a lucid chief executive returning home after a fruitful colloquy with other western leaders at the economic summit held in Ottawa in mid-July. Cannon did mention in the tenth paragraph that “Reagan appeared tired to the point of near-exhaustion,” but this observation was quickly qualified by the opinion of “aides” that the president had been doing a lot of prep for the conference and was also worried about the Middle East.

Cannon shared his brief session with Reagan aboard Air Force One with Hedrick Smith of the New York Times, who similarly gave his readers the impression of a president in touch with things rather than the incoherent old man they had actually encountered. As did Cannon, Smith wove the few quotable remarks from Reagan into a tapestry of attributed presidential dicta passed on — and no doubt confected— by Meese, Deaver,and Speakes. It is clear from Cannon’s account of the conference itself that Reagan was fogged up throughout the actual conference, occasionally interjecting trivial observations or homely jokes into the proceedings and then relapsing into bemused silence. Cannon’s memoir is one more indication of the cover-up that took place in the wake of Hinckley’s assassination bid on March 30, 1981. At the time of the shooting, the press was full of phrases like “bouncing back,” “iron constitution,” and other terms indicating that Reagan had emerged from the ordeal in good shape. In fact Reagan very nearly died on the operating table and was a dotard afterwards. He never fully recovered.

Conclusion: Unless a president is actually dead, the WhiteHouse press corps can be relied upon to present him as both sentient and sapient, no matter how decrepit his physical and mental condition.

SOURCE in PDF form:

http://liesofourtimes.org/public_html/1991/Nov1991%20V2%20N10/Nov1991%20V2%20N10.pdf



Somewhere in Detroit, 1980 GOP Convention:



After the election, the relationship really, ah, evolved:



George Bush Takes Charge

The Uses of "Counter-Terrorism"

By Christopher Simpson
Covert Action Quarterly 58

A paper trail of declassified documents from the Reagan‑Bush era yields valuable information on how counter‑terrorism provided a powerful mechanism for solidifying Bush's power base and launching a broad range of national security initiatives.

During the Reagan years, George Bush used "crisis management" and "counter‑terrorism" as vehicles for running key parts of the clandestine side of the US government.

Bush proved especially adept at plausible denial. Some measure of his skill in avoiding responsibility can be taken from the fact that even after the Iran‑Contra affair blew the Reagan administration apart, Bush went on to become the "foreign policy president," while CIA Director William Casey, by then conveniently dead, took most of the blame for a number of covert foreign policy debacles that Bush had set in motion.

The trail of National Security Decision Directives (NSDDS) left by the Reagan administration begins to tell the story. True, much remains classified, and still more was never committed to paper in the first place. Even so, the main picture is clear: As vice president, George Bush was at the center of secret wars, political murders, and America's convoluted oil politics in the Middle East.

SNIP...

Reagan and the NSC also used NSDDs to settle conflicts among security agencies over bureaucratic turf and lines of command. It is through that prism that we see the first glimmers of Vice President Bush's role in clandestine operations during the 1980s.

CONTINUED...



More details from the good professor:



EXCERPT...

NSDD 159. MANAGEMENT OF U.S. COVERT OPERATIONS, (TOP SECRET/VEIL‑SENSITIVE), JAN. 18,1985

The Reagan administration's commitment to significantly expand covert operations had been clear since before the 1980 election. How such operations were actually to be managed from day to day, however, was considerably less certain. The management problem became particularly knotty owing to legal requirements to notify congressional intelligence oversight committees of covert operations, on the one hand, and the tacitly accepted presidential mandate to deceive those same committees concerning sensitive operations such as the Contra war in Nicaragua, on the other.

The solution attempted in NSDD 159 was to establish a small coordinating committee headed by Vice President George Bush through which all information concerning US covert operations was to be funneled. The order also established a category of top secret information known as Veil, to be used exclusively for managing records pertaining to covert operations.

[font color="red"]The system was designed to keep circulation of written records to an absolute minimum while at the same time ensuring that the vice president retained the ability to coordinate US covert operations with the administration's overt diplomacy and propaganda.

Only eight copies of NSDD 159 were created. The existence of the vice president's committee was itself highly classified.
[/font color] The directive became public as a result of the criminal prosecutions of Oliver North, John Poindexter, and others involved in the Iran‑Contra affair, hence the designation "Exhibit A" running up the left side of the document.

CONTINUED...

CovertAction Quarterly no 58 Fall 1996 pp31-40.



This all matters because there's a steady bloody red line from 1981 to the present day few write about. More would, were the nation's news media honest and lived up to their constitutional mandate. Today they may have hijacked for their own use the NSA -- what Sen. Frank Church warned us about in 1975.



Behind the Curtain: Booz Allen Hamilton and its Owner, The Carlyle Group

Written by Bob Adelmann
The New American; June 13, 2013

According to writers Thomas Heath and Marjorie Censer at the Washington Post, The Carlyle Group and its errant child, Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), have a public relations problem, thanks to NSA leaker and former BAH employee Edward Snowden. By the time top management at BAH learned that one of their top level agents had gone rogue, and terminated his employment, it was too late.

For years Carlyle had, according to the Post, “nurtured a reputation as a financially sophisticated asset manager that buys and sells everything from railroads to oil refineries”; but now the light from the Snowden revelations has revealed nothing more than two companies, parent and child, “bound by the thread of turning government secrets into profits.”

And have they ever. When The Carlyle Group bought BAH back in 2008, it was totally dependent upon government contracts in the fields of information technology (IT) and systems engineering for its bread and butter. But there wasn't much butter: After two years the company’s gross revenues were $5.1 billion but net profits were a minuscule $25 million, close to a rounding error on the company’s financial statement. In 2012, however, BAH grossed $5.8 billion and showed earnings of $219 million, nearly a nine-fold increase in net revenues and a nice gain in value for Carlyle.

Unwittingly, the Post authors exposed the real reason for the jump in profitability: close ties and interconnected relationships between top people at Carlyle and BAH, and the agencies with which they are working. The authors quoted George Price, an equity analyst at BB&T Capital: "[Booz Allen has] got a great brand, they've focused over time on hiring top people, including bringing on people who have a lot of senior government experience."

CONTINUED w Links n Privatized INTEL...

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/15696-behind-the-curtain-booz-allen-hamilton-and-its-owner-the-carlyle-group


Wouldn't it be great to live in a democracy, a republic built on equal justice for all, though? Traitors, warmongers and banksters would be in jail instead of printing money.

Instead, we've lived ''Money trumps peace'' since the Ayatollah gave Reagan a major for the Hostages and Jimmy Carter got the boot as a failed, miserable human being. Did you know he was one of the bravest men to ever serve as President?

One would not know it, reading the newspapers or watching the tee vee, even PBS. Without you, KoKo, silvershadow, and a bunch of great DUers who care, they wouldn't know what they were missing -- especially Democracy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R Dragonfli May 2016 #1
I am 70 plus and am not liking it either. alfie May 2016 #2
I'm 26.. Thank you. We know it's not all younger people that see this only Joob May 2016 #3
Old Sanders supporter here, too. Urchin May 2016 #85
I know 50 years ago gays couldn't get married. Agschmid May 2016 #4
Relevance to the OP? nt silvershadow May 2016 #5
Well you said 50 years ago everything was fine and dandy. Agschmid May 2016 #6
Sounds like you are just the type of person I referenced in the OP. nt silvershadow May 2016 #7
What gay and happy I can get married now? Agschmid May 2016 #8
Which is fine and dandy, but has nothing to do with the OP. Whatsoever. nt silvershadow May 2016 #11
Sure it does... Blanks May 2016 #35
This has zero to do with gays or any other issue. It has to due with our form of government. silvershadow May 2016 #37
Our "form" of government has not changed in the past 50 years, so try again. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #71
The TPP. I remember a few months ago when it was still ok to discuss that here. nt silvershadow May 2016 #73
So since when does discussing the TPP get you banned from DU? That's the problem with politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #75
It's not because I am a Bernie supporter. It's because I am a proud Union labor man. nt silvershadow May 2016 #76
Don't you know Urchin May 2016 #86
I never knew that. nt silvershadow May 2016 #87
Well now you do! Urchin May 2016 #90
And women were expected to be barefoot and pregnant. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #55
Yup. Agschmid May 2016 #103
Some people are delusional Trenzalore May 2016 #40
Nice deflection. The OP isn't about 50 years ago, as you well know. It is about our form of silvershadow May 2016 #44
The Corporate Coup d'etat happened a long time ago Trenzalore May 2016 #45
Sorry, been on the case for a loooong time. Nice try. nt silvershadow May 2016 #47
You are pining for a time Trenzalore May 2016 #48
You didn't even read the OP it is clear. I am not pining for 50 years ago. But you knew that. silvershadow May 2016 #49
In the 1960s Trenzalore May 2016 #53
That's the standard? "Hey, at least you didn't get shot in the head?" Wow. Crazy stuff there. nt silvershadow May 2016 #56
You picked the 60s Trenzalore May 2016 #57
No, you picked the 60's rather than the topic of the OP. I just responded, unnecessarily. nt silvershadow May 2016 #58
If you asked me if I had more hope after 8 years of Obama Trenzalore May 2016 #65
I asked you no such thing. nt silvershadow May 2016 #66
Thats right and their followers were picked up in the middle of the night workinclasszero May 2016 #143
There has always Urchin May 2016 #88
50 years ago, the Vietnam war was rapidly escalating. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #50
And decades from now Urchin May 2016 #92
Indeed, up until just recently marriage has been a sacred bond between a man and a woman Fumesucker May 2016 #114
Why parse it? Civil rights are ongoing. A piece of a much bigger puzzle. Human rights are better but snowy owl May 2016 #121
No one wants to go back 50 years. JaneyVee May 2016 #9
Nice deflection from the overriding point of the OP. nt silvershadow May 2016 #12
Nice deflection of your obvious screw up. JaneyVee May 2016 #13
Wow. no point in us talking further. nt silvershadow May 2016 #14
It sucked for white males between the ages of 18-22 Trenzalore May 2016 #46
Pretty sure all races went to Vietnam. JaneyVee May 2016 #52
Should all white people or men vote Trump? JPnoodleman May 2016 #115
How about the draft Trenzalore May 2016 #42
I was 1-A prime beef and had to sweat it out Armstead May 2016 #110
America is heading back more than 50 years, more like 100+ years to oligarchic plutocratic Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #28
Sixty-years ago Urchin May 2016 #81
Sander's fans do workinclasszero May 2016 #144
If Hillary wins by hook or by crook, you will no doubt find yourself on America's first bullet train NorthCarolina May 2016 #10
Pre Roe v Wade, gays forced in the closet, civil rights for nobody but white males. PeaceNikki May 2016 #15
Which has nothing to do with the OP. nt silvershadow May 2016 #16
It has everything to do with the OP PeaceNikki May 2016 #17
I wrote the OP. No, it doesn't. The OP is about Corporatacray. nt silvershadow May 2016 #18
In the 60s, women couldn't serve on juries PeaceNikki May 2016 #19
And I never said any such thing. Your mind has taken you astray. Stay on topic, please. nt silvershadow May 2016 #20
I'll take the topic whatever way I see fit, thanks. PeaceNikki May 2016 #21
My OP. My topic. Your diversion. Democracy vs Cororatacracy. No contest. At all. nt silvershadow May 2016 #22
My observation, you mean. PeaceNikki May 2016 #23
Yes, I did observe the slide out of democracy. I lived it. Your point? nt silvershadow May 2016 #24
I made my point. We've had a ton of progressive victories in the past 50 years. PeaceNikki May 2016 #26
So you believe Corporatocracy (Fascism) is a good thing for women? AgingAmerican May 2016 #29
Newp. PeaceNikki May 2016 #31
The corporacracy is happy to give us social victories, just as long as they gain further silvershadow May 2016 #30
corporacracy isn't a word. PeaceNikki May 2016 #32
Bye. nt silvershadow May 2016 #33
Bye, Felicia! PeaceNikki May 2016 #34
You're very dishonest. The perfect Hillary drone...deny the truth and twist the words to define haikugal May 2016 #77
Lol, there was no attack. PeaceNikki May 2016 #78
jury duty mog75 May 2016 #82
I agree with you sandyshoes17 May 2016 #83
In the last several years the PTB have stolen my house, $80k in payments, and silvershadow May 2016 #84
How was your house stolen? Agschmid May 2016 #104
During the Great Con Job. nt silvershadow May 2016 #106
Ok... Agschmid May 2016 #107
If you are a lawyer offering to help me, please PM me. nt silvershadow May 2016 #108
I'm not a lawyer, and I can be of little to no help. Agschmid May 2016 #109
I hear you my friend beware the ides of May! Silver_Witch May 2016 #139
No. Your fallacy is called a straw man argument. hellofromreddit May 2016 #36
Please hold while I note your concern. PeaceNikki May 2016 #38
You misunderstand. I never said you weren't smug enough. hellofromreddit May 2016 #39
Lol, how shall I ever sleep while your opinion of me suffers? PeaceNikki May 2016 #43
You continue to fail to prove your point. hellofromreddit May 2016 #67
Yes, it does. The fact that you can't see that is the problem Recursion May 2016 #117
Social repression in the Union labor movement? That takes some big balls. nt silvershadow May 2016 #127
You're not familiar with the role of many unions in keeping black workers off shop floors? Recursion May 2016 #128
There you go again, talking about the 1960's...Can we just talk about 1992 and later? nt silvershadow May 2016 #129
Happily. Oddly enough I just did an OP about that Recursion May 2016 #130
Lame. Deflective. You no longer have the same form of government, which as you know silvershadow May 2016 #131
I disagree Recursion May 2016 #132
I know you do. nt silvershadow May 2016 #133
I see what you mean farleftlib May 2016 #25
Corporatocracy is just another word for Fascism AgingAmerican May 2016 #27
I agree with this. And, seriously, I must say… CobaltBlue May 2016 #41
Remember in 1963 Trenzalore May 2016 #51
Remember in 1992 When the Clintons continued the Republican tradition of destroying silvershadow May 2016 #54
If you want to compare what sucked more the 90s or the 60s Trenzalore May 2016 #59
I don't want to compare anything. You do. Way off topic. But you knew that. nt silvershadow May 2016 #60
You don't want to compare Trenzalore May 2016 #68
I want to compare this form of government to democracy, yes. The TPP and all else, as you silvershadow May 2016 #70
So, how old ARE you? MineralMan May 2016 #61
Which has nothing to do with which form of government we have. nt silvershadow May 2016 #63
Nonsense. It has everything to do with it. MineralMan May 2016 #64
I'm pretty sure that they didn't even read their own OP. Agschmid May 2016 #105
President Eisenhower warned the nation about the influence of the military industrial complex 1961 Fresh_Start May 2016 #62
Yep. And corporations were declared to have the same rights as people as early as 1886. ContinentalOp May 2016 #93
I take it that you are sadoldgirl May 2016 #69
And you better believe they are looking at and salivating over Matariki May 2016 #72
Yep. nt silvershadow May 2016 #74
Thank you pmorlan1 May 2016 #79
Yes they do. You are welcome. Thank you for weighing in with the vote of confidence. nt silvershadow May 2016 #80
Thank you for putting it into words, silvershadow. Octafish May 2016 #89
Wow. That's a keeper. Looks like from original DU? nt silvershadow May 2016 #91
DU2. Why to keep fighting the Good Fight. Octafish May 2016 #95
Great post. I will pour over it as soon as I eat my supper. Thanks for the kind words. nt silvershadow May 2016 #98
....! KoKo May 2016 #94
October Surprise + Safari Club = CIA Old Boys in Power For Ever and Ever Octafish May 2016 #97
your OP has been hi-jacked, triangulated, and suffered from way too many deflective responses... islandmkl May 2016 #96
Hear, fucking!, hear. Great post. ebayfool May 2016 #111
+1,000,000 Hydra May 2016 #113
^^^^this^^^^ cliffordu May 2016 #119
It's not hijacking to point out your myopia Recursion May 2016 #123
bad premise - all wages across all races have stagnated...and you know it's not about islandmkl May 2016 #125
Negative. African Americans have seen significant income gains over the past 40 years Recursion May 2016 #126
it appears to be a matter of looking a statistics from different angles islandmkl May 2016 #134
the gap is not closing: islandmkl May 2016 #135
I said "caught up with the quintile below them" Recursion May 2016 #136
Standing ovation!! Silver_Witch May 2016 #140
K&R jwirr May 2016 #99
Whiny Bernie-Bro who wants to lay around smoking dope and getting free stuff! tabasco May 2016 #100
The party is like Mitt Romney bought it and stripped it of its' valuable assets. silvershadow May 2016 #101
I understand and agree with your post. nruthie May 2016 #102
Here's the good news. None of us are too old to get back to oasis May 2016 #112
I'm glad as hell we aren't the country we were 50 years ago Recursion May 2016 #116
Absolutely not. I'm solidly middle class because I could get an college education without debt. snowy owl May 2016 #122
I wish I could K&R this for a week. cliffordu May 2016 #118
Lack of institutional memory. Study Eisenhower in fifties. It is different. Few seem to know it. snowy owl May 2016 #120
Taken For Granted At Davos That US Government Run On ‘Legalized Corruption’ Octafish May 2016 #142
At least people are waking up & they are very angry emsimon33 May 2016 #124
great post. Ignore all those trying to kick up dust ProfessorPlum May 2016 #137
Not to worry, the bankers will still have sleepovers in the WH no matter which side wins! dmosh42 May 2016 #138
I have assumed I have been living under a new form of government randr May 2016 #141
This is a very old fight felix_numinous May 2016 #145
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I really wasn't planning ...»Reply #97