Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Prediction: Hillary's "Legacy" will be the first one-term Democratic President since Jimmy Carter. [View all]cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)21. Two-for-one? The way the Clintons have always promised? God forbid she gets elected... nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prediction: Hillary's "Legacy" will be the first one-term Democratic President since Jimmy Carter. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
OP
name one "progressive" who would beat Hillary in a primary-Bernie with all his minions
redstateblues
May 2016
#11
Stop talking about Bernie and get with the reality of a President who hasn't managed change by 2016.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#16
So you think BS would only be a 1 term President as well, eh? Because if you think Secretary Clinton
SFnomad
May 2016
#5
I don't think Bernie Sanders has ever planned to run for reelection.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#7
If Richard Nixon were alive, he would be the perfect VP for Hillary Clinton. Two peas in a pod. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#49
On the contrary, Clinton supporters seem to think that she will "get things done" and Sanders won't.
That Guy 888
May 2016
#57
Isn't that basically the question I just asked? Typical that you couldn't answer the
SFnomad
May 2016
#65
What about Bernie' revolution? What about his "movement" in the coming mid terms.
redstateblues
May 2016
#26
We're LUCKY Reagan wasn't elected in '76. We would have gone to war with the Russians over Iran. nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#13
"Votes cast" are minus those independents who didn't know they couldn't vote for Bernie.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#18
Two-for-one? The way the Clintons have always promised? God forbid she gets elected... nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#21
I agree this will probably happen, although it would surely happen with Sanders too.
ContinentalOp
May 2016
#19
My preference would be four years of Bernie, and eight years of Elizabeth Warren. nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#22
Unless you're an Enlisted person in the Armed Forces of the United States of America.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#44
So NEXT TIME liberal Independents all turn out big? But not now- or in two years? WTFingF?
bettyellen
May 2016
#41
They won't be caught unaware of the need to change their affiliation in order to vote in primaries.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#45
I'm not assuming she will be the nominee or win the general if she is the nominee.
merrily
May 2016
#52
Well, if Bernie can't win, let's at least wish the worst for the first woman president
Onlooker
May 2016
#55