Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Prediction: Hillary's "Legacy" will be the first one-term Democratic President since Jimmy Carter. [View all]cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)29. It was ever thus, and thus it shall be once more...
Disappointment is the most common outcome of the Human Condition.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prediction: Hillary's "Legacy" will be the first one-term Democratic President since Jimmy Carter. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
OP
name one "progressive" who would beat Hillary in a primary-Bernie with all his minions
redstateblues
May 2016
#11
Stop talking about Bernie and get with the reality of a President who hasn't managed change by 2016.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#16
So you think BS would only be a 1 term President as well, eh? Because if you think Secretary Clinton
SFnomad
May 2016
#5
I don't think Bernie Sanders has ever planned to run for reelection.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#7
If Richard Nixon were alive, he would be the perfect VP for Hillary Clinton. Two peas in a pod. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#49
On the contrary, Clinton supporters seem to think that she will "get things done" and Sanders won't.
That Guy 888
May 2016
#57
Isn't that basically the question I just asked? Typical that you couldn't answer the
SFnomad
May 2016
#65
What about Bernie' revolution? What about his "movement" in the coming mid terms.
redstateblues
May 2016
#26
We're LUCKY Reagan wasn't elected in '76. We would have gone to war with the Russians over Iran. nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#13
"Votes cast" are minus those independents who didn't know they couldn't vote for Bernie.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#18
Two-for-one? The way the Clintons have always promised? God forbid she gets elected... nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#21
I agree this will probably happen, although it would surely happen with Sanders too.
ContinentalOp
May 2016
#19
My preference would be four years of Bernie, and eight years of Elizabeth Warren. nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#22
Unless you're an Enlisted person in the Armed Forces of the United States of America.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#44
So NEXT TIME liberal Independents all turn out big? But not now- or in two years? WTFingF?
bettyellen
May 2016
#41
They won't be caught unaware of the need to change their affiliation in order to vote in primaries.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#45
I'm not assuming she will be the nominee or win the general if she is the nominee.
merrily
May 2016
#52
Well, if Bernie can't win, let's at least wish the worst for the first woman president
Onlooker
May 2016
#55