Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
15. I don't blame the investigation, I blame the speculation and innuendo used as a political cudgel
Fri May 6, 2016, 11:30 AM
May 2016

...against Hillary Clinton.

We're supposed to accept the frame that she's done something criminal when there's zero investigation of other administration secretaries and offices which also maintained and used private servers.

The investigation was 'sparked' by a NYT report which revealed the use of the private servers. What preceded the report (and obviously sparked it) was a hyped and cynical republican investigation into their Benghazi canard which demanded thousands of pages of communications from Sec. Clinton's office.

What's occurring now is an investigation which isn't likely to carry criminal charges, unless the government is prepared to prosecute previous administration's conduct, so it's silly to say opposing the politics surrounding the investigation is an attack on the Obama administration.

All you're doing is projecting the critic's summary verdict of guilt to deflect from the fact that no one has been charged, and there's virtually nothing out there for critics to bolster all of their chitter-chatter about indictments.

Nope! NWCorona May 2016 #1
Yes! scscholar May 2016 #31
to be fair, it would have been a different lawsuit. 6chars May 2016 #32
Let's see...there was no investigation of Rice or powell Demsrule86 May 2016 #2
Powell and Rice never set up a private server CoffeeCat May 2016 #11
That needs to be emphasized because they keep repeating it... Bob41213 May 2016 #19
It is inaccurate CoffeeCat May 2016 #25
sec'y of defense enid602 May 2016 #26
As their only email in gov? Bob41213 May 2016 #29
Law was changed in 2014. JaneyVee May 2016 #3
My second question is why didn't SoS Clinton follow normal protocols of the US government? mmonk May 2016 #4
Answer: FlatBaroque May 2016 #6
Part of it I suppose. But I'm thinking deeper. mmonk May 2016 #13
To do everything in secret was the goal. Bob41213 May 2016 #20
we don't even get to see her SPEECHES MisterP May 2016 #22
That reminds me, has anyone estimated the cost so far of investigating FlatBaroque May 2016 #5
Dunno maybe Ken Starr is keeping track. emulatorloo May 2016 #8
There would be some other outrage to replace it. JoePhilly May 2016 #7
Yep. cheapdate May 2016 #30
Sanders' campaign and supporters have used the right-wing 'watchdog' group's lawsuit bigtree May 2016 #9
I don't care what others use it for. These questions are mine. mmonk May 2016 #10
And mine. How will this stop the TPP? How will this stop the Corporatacracy? silvershadow May 2016 #14
Actually the FBI thing was not a direct result of GOP TimPlo May 2016 #12
I don't blame the investigation, I blame the speculation and innuendo used as a political cudgel bigtree May 2016 #15
Neutral federal judges and the neutral FBI/DOJ belie your entire premise. Bonk. morningfog May 2016 #27
No FBI. Yes FOIA. n/t ieoeja May 2016 #16
no, but there is the issue of State and CF amborin May 2016 #17
Obvious, just like the transcripts, she wants to be absolutely secretive like everything else pdsimdars May 2016 #18
She has a bad case of hubris. Not uncommon among the rich and powerful. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #21
Probably still a FOIA since the Rethugs were desperate to find anything to attack her with. DCBob May 2016 #23
It should be noted my questions are morally related. mmonk May 2016 #24
Yes. Judicial Watch has been suing the Clintons since the 90s. nt msanthrope May 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Would there be an FBI inv...»Reply #15