Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The number of "democrats" on this board who hate democracy is appalling. [View all]bjo59
(1,166 posts)28. Have to agree with you. It's a real eye opener.
People can't defend democracy if they don't even know what it is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The number of "democrats" on this board who hate democracy is appalling. [View all]
Jokerman
May 2016
OP
Faults? No doubt. But I have followed them over the years and both have fought for the 99%
lagomorph777
May 2016
#66
Oh, I must have overslept - is it July already? The will of WV, CA, OR has been told?
lagomorph777
May 2016
#50
Woohoo! Now that's what I call telling somebody off. And he/she sure asked for it.
brush
May 2016
#61
So the Democratic Party is a *club* more than a philosophy or set of principles.
yodermon
May 2016
#14
It's only a club, and not at all a philosophy or a set of principles.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2016
#123
I thought third party advocacy was a TOS violation, and that looks like what you're doing. nt
Electric Monk
May 2016
#17
Until we get a system in place that we can trust, I support caucuses b/c they're harder to steal.
Skwmom
May 2016
#3
Caucuses in the past have supported the front runner. If HRC had won the caucuses, you'd hate them.
FSogol
May 2016
#4
Again. Caucuses are harder to steal. The only two she won were Iowa where even the
Skwmom
May 2016
#21
Caucuses are even easier to steal. Hand counts hoping the counters turn in honest results
brush
May 2016
#65
Can someone explain to me why Caucuses are bad? I've only voted in one and was pretty democratic.
Joob
May 2016
#8
Caucuses are bad because She couldn't steal them. The machine did the best it could but not enough.
Vincardog
May 2016
#10
Bernie won the caucuses. They also don't count the individuals hence the HRC crowd's constant "We
Vincardog
May 2016
#54
sorry but I will always prefer my mail in ballot primary over our caucus.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#81
Bernie knew the rules up front, so he has no cause for complaint when he's losing.
procon
May 2016
#13
Yep. Only an undemocratic asshole would argue that the superdelegates should overturn
Nye Bevan
May 2016
#18
They have made the property owner argument. Very clearly. I am taking nothing out of context.
NCTraveler
May 2016
#29
My candidate doesn't do well when only dems are allow to pick it's party's nom so therefore we need
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#52
If you don't allow Independents a say in the primary then don't be surprised
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#58
If you refuse to commit to a party don't be surprised if can't vote in their primary
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#60
So I guess you don't care how Independents vote in the GE. Good to know.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#62
Then I guess they don't care what type of government they get. Bush's administration worked out very
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#70
Well then the Democrats shouldn't complain when they don't get the Independent vote in the GE.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#71
Then indies shouldn't complain when they lose the right to abortions, or voting , net neutrality,
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#73
If they had a say in who wins the primary they may be more inclined to vote Democratic.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#74
Many have, but some states are either making it very difficult or outright switching
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#77
And most of that is due to excitement for Bernie. If he doesn't win the primary,
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#90
We do know they both have low favorability ratings and we know both will fling huge
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#97
Ah, blame the voter. That's great. Why not make them bring voter ID with them while
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#88
Yes, and Bernie is expected to do very well in Oregon. Like I said the excitement is for Bernie.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#95
It's the voter's responsibility to take care of their own registration, isn't it?
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#99
Yes, and it is also the government's and the parties' responsibility to make
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#100
States having closed Primaries is not them trying to make it harder for you to vote in them . Primar
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#102
Sorry but I believe closed primaries are undemocratic. You will not convince me otherwise.
liberal_at_heart
May 2016
#105
Of course because you wanted Bernie to win so anything you view as an obstacle to that is bad and
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#122
Take these complaints to the General Election, this is primary time, in fact the
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#78
Plus... Do the people pushing for change want the DNC to force the states into one-size-fits all..
Henhouse
May 2016
#94
Following this board, the next fad is only women of 50 and up will be allowed to vote.
insta8er
May 2016
#101