Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
28. Have to agree with you. It's a real eye opener.
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:14 PM
May 2016

People can't defend democracy if they don't even know what it is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I know trying to overturn the will of the voters is wrong Demsrule86 May 2016 #1
Nobody, especially Sanders, has any intention or desire of doing that. lagomorph777 May 2016 #6
Except for the millions more who WhiteTara May 2016 #31
I disagree with her positions, lagomorph777 May 2016 #37
These are only a few of the epitaphs that are used WhiteTara May 2016 #44
For the record, I'd be delighted to have a woman president lagomorph777 May 2016 #47
Oh, I'm sure that you would have found reasons WhiteTara May 2016 #51
Faults? No doubt. But I have followed them over the years and both have fought for the 99% lagomorph777 May 2016 #66
Epithet. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #108
damn auto fill and spell check WhiteTara May 2016 #112
Her positions and Bernie's positions are closer than any Republican... LaydeeBug May 2016 #49
Oh, I must have overslept - is it July already? The will of WV, CA, OR has been told? lagomorph777 May 2016 #50
Thank you! OnionPatch May 2016 #104
Yes, which is another primary point why our elections are not democratic. MoonchildCA May 2016 #114
your not gas lighting me DLCWIdem May 2016 #64
Perhaps you turned on the gas yourself lagomorph777 May 2016 #67
Wow. Most misguided OP in a long time. Buzz Clik May 2016 #2
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #12
Ok, gloves off. Buzz Clik May 2016 #19
+100 rock May 2016 #27
Ooooooooooo.... Purveyor May 2016 #42
Woohoo! Now that's what I call telling somebody off. And he/she sure asked for it. brush May 2016 #61
Excellent response. Andy823 May 2016 #82
That has got to leave a mark! COLGATE4 May 2016 #113
Nicely done! NurseJackie May 2016 #118
Nicely done. JoePhilly May 2016 #119
So the Democratic Party is a *club* more than a philosophy or set of principles. yodermon May 2016 #14
It's only a club, and not at all a philosophy or a set of principles. Donald Ian Rankin May 2016 #123
I thought third party advocacy was a TOS violation, and that looks like what you're doing. nt Electric Monk May 2016 #17
Until we get a system in place that we can trust, I support caucuses b/c they're harder to steal. Skwmom May 2016 #3
Caucuses in the past have supported the front runner. If HRC had won the caucuses, you'd hate them. FSogol May 2016 #4
Again. Caucuses are harder to steal. The only two she won were Iowa where even the Skwmom May 2016 #21
Total nonsense. n/t FSogol May 2016 #22
It is. She likes them because they worked for Bernie Hortensis May 2016 #40
No machines. Paper ballots only monitored by reps from all candidates. floriduck May 2016 #30
We have a lot of red states right now WhiteTara May 2016 #35
Caucuses are even easier to steal. Hand counts hoping the counters turn in honest results brush May 2016 #65
I've sadi this here before Ferd Berfel May 2016 #5
"Thurd Way" is a typo lagomorph777 May 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #11
Closed primaries do not disenfranchise voters. Adrahil May 2016 #7
Can someone explain to me why Caucuses are bad? I've only voted in one and was pretty democratic. Joob May 2016 #8
Caucuses are bad because She couldn't steal them. The machine did the best it could but not enough. Vincardog May 2016 #10
The only fair election has a Bernie win. I know. WhiteTara May 2016 #36
Show me the ballots. The exit polls don't match on the Democratic side. Vincardog May 2016 #39
There aren't any ballots in a caucus. WhiteTara May 2016 #46
Bernie won the caucuses. They also don't count the individuals hence the HRC crowd's constant "We Vincardog May 2016 #54
Bernie won SOME of the caucuses. WhiteTara May 2016 #63
She's ahead any way you count it she has no need to steal anything Ohioblue22 May 2016 #55
Then why does she keep doing it? Vincardog May 2016 #56
She isn't you are just mad cause your prefered is losing Ohioblue22 May 2016 #59
Because not everybody can devote hours to stay at one mythology May 2016 #33
I voted at noon. And no one has to say who they vote for. Joob May 2016 #45
take too long no secret ballot DLCWIdem May 2016 #68
Well I voted in one and experienced none of that, took 2 hours Joob May 2016 #72
sorry but I will always prefer my mail in ballot primary over our caucus. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #81
Not all caucus elections work like that Mnpaul May 2016 #93
very good DLCWIdem May 2016 #115
I am from Minnesota Mnpaul May 2016 #116
my co-worker was very excited about participating in her very first caucaus DLCWIdem May 2016 #120
Bernie knew the rules up front, so he has no cause for complaint when he's losing. procon May 2016 #13
He was so busy trashing his opponent he couldn't be WhiteTara May 2016 #48
If your candidate was winning based on everything you stated in your OP, asuhornets May 2016 #15
From what I understand Proud Liberal Dem May 2016 #16
Also, MSMITH33156 May 2016 #23
Right Proud Liberal Dem May 2016 #26
Those party rules worked better when we were the majority jwirr May 2016 #25
Yep. Only an undemocratic asshole would argue that the superdelegates should overturn Nye Bevan May 2016 #18
Numerous Sanders supporters have made the property owner argument. NCTraveler May 2016 #20
Sanders voters Turin_C3PO May 2016 #24
They have made the property owner argument. Very clearly. I am taking nothing out of context. NCTraveler May 2016 #29
That's terrible. Turin_C3PO May 2016 #32
Have to agree with you. It's a real eye opener. bjo59 May 2016 #28
"Undergrounders" who are in love with our overlords. nt. villager May 2016 #34
I'm not arguing in favor of any of those things... Blue_Tires May 2016 #38
They are authoritarian elitists. HooptieWagon May 2016 #41
I agree with you on Superdelegates and caucuses LostOne4Ever May 2016 #43
I think there are several problems with the current landscape trudyco May 2016 #79
My candidate doesn't do well when only dems are allow to pick it's party's nom so therefore we need Ohioblue22 May 2016 #52
If you don't allow Independents a say in the primary then don't be surprised liberal_at_heart May 2016 #58
If you refuse to commit to a party don't be surprised if can't vote in their primary Ohioblue22 May 2016 #60
So I guess you don't care how Independents vote in the GE. Good to know. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #62
Then I guess they don't care what type of government they get. Bush's administration worked out very Ohioblue22 May 2016 #70
Well then the Democrats shouldn't complain when they don't get the Independent vote in the GE. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #71
Then indies shouldn't complain when they lose the right to abortions, or voting , net neutrality, Ohioblue22 May 2016 #73
If they had a say in who wins the primary they may be more inclined to vote Democratic. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #74
They can have a say just join the party Ohioblue22 May 2016 #75
Many have, but some states are either making it very difficult or outright switching liberal_at_heart May 2016 #77
In 2012 Romney won with Independents jamese777 May 2016 #84
Independents are now 42% of the electorate and growing. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #86
More People Are Engaged in this election jamese777 May 2016 #89
And most of that is due to excitement for Bernie. If he doesn't win the primary, liberal_at_heart May 2016 #90
No one knows what will happen 6 months from now jamese777 May 2016 #96
We do know they both have low favorability ratings and we know both will fling huge liberal_at_heart May 2016 #97
Don't wait till the last minute to try to switch Ohioblue22 May 2016 #87
Ah, blame the voter. That's great. Why not make them bring voter ID with them while liberal_at_heart May 2016 #88
110,000 changed their affiliation in Oregon jamese777 May 2016 #92
Yes, and Bernie is expected to do very well in Oregon. Like I said the excitement is for Bernie. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #95
It's the voter's responsibility to take care of their own registration, isn't it? Ohioblue22 May 2016 #99
Yes, and it is also the government's and the parties' responsibility to make liberal_at_heart May 2016 #100
States having closed Primaries is not them trying to make it harder for you to vote in them . Primar Ohioblue22 May 2016 #102
Sorry but I believe closed primaries are undemocratic. You will not convince me otherwise. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #105
Of course because you wanted Bernie to win so anything you view as an obstacle to that is bad and Ohioblue22 May 2016 #122
caucus suck MFM008 May 2016 #53
The sour is strong in these grapes Ohioblue22 May 2016 #57
They are making whine. wildeyed May 2016 #111
KNR amborin May 2016 #69
How long have we known about the primary season? justiceischeap May 2016 #76
Take these complaints to the General Election, this is primary time, in fact the Thinkingabout May 2016 #78
Super delegates are elected public and party officials The Second Stone May 2016 #80
A Political Party is a private entity jamese777 May 2016 #83
I agree DesertRat May 2016 #85
Plus... Do the people pushing for change want the DNC to force the states into one-size-fits all.. Henhouse May 2016 #94
If Conservatives or Independents want to join the Democratic party, do so. randome May 2016 #91
I don't want self-identified Republicans ratfucking us -- my only reason for.. moriah May 2016 #98
Following this board, the next fad is only women of 50 and up will be allowed to vote. insta8er May 2016 #101
Nah, they just vote in far greater numbers wildeyed May 2016 #106
When the GOP disenfranchises them this Fall.. Jack Bone May 2016 #103
Seems to me like OnionPatch May 2016 #107
There is a de facto poll tax in some states. grasswire May 2016 #109
You and I disagree on what the term wildeyed May 2016 #110
What's next? Hillary is soliciting Bush donors. Broward May 2016 #117
Yes. Already ongoing. nt silvershadow May 2016 #121
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The number of "democrats"...»Reply #28