Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(12,865 posts)
50. To the right of Nixon doesn't exactly qualify as "progressive."
Sun May 8, 2016, 06:42 PM
May 2016

The Democratic establishment has moved so far to the right they don't qualify as "progressive."
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/197334-obama-nixon-was-more-liberal

You show your values by what you are willing to stand up for -- not your rhetoric. By that measure, there are few very few who actually qualify as progressives in the House, Senate, and other positions of power.

When it comes to showing the courage of their conviction to progressive values, the Democratic establishment has engaged in a consistent pattern of preemptive surrender: Can't win, so don't fight. Oh no! Someone might say bad things about us!

Their repeated demonstrations of weakness sows hopelessness and cynicism. It's the reason Democrats have been losing ground. The injuries are self-inflicted.

When will they realize that standing up for principle, win or lose, is the only way they can redeem themselves and inspire voters to come out and vote for them?

Even Bill Clinton "got it" once upon a time when he said: "When people feel uncertain, they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong than somebody, who's weak and right."

When will they realize that "strong and right" is the only way to win the day over "strong and wrong"?

"Progressive" my ass.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you think Bernie Sanders can only restore the voter's memories? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #1
What does "Progressive" mean to the Clinton Machine? NewImproved Deal May 2016 #2
LOL! vintx May 2016 #3
Hah ok then Joob May 2016 #4
The unintentional sarcasm of this post is... well, entertaining, to say the least. pangaia May 2016 #5
I'm sure that's her sales pitch to those Bush donors she's so fond of. Broward May 2016 #6
That statement becomes questionable at the third word. What s the meaning of is HereSince1628 May 2016 #7
We'll see in November. By then I suspect all of the Sanders people fears will be realized mikehiggins May 2016 #8
Don't fret. It will be explained away as some form of multidimensional chess... RufusTFirefly May 2016 #39
Hillary has done more for Women's Rights as SOS.......... thelordofhell May 2016 #9
Like ISIS in Libya? hobbit709 May 2016 #15
Like what she did for Berta Cáceres , bahrbearian May 2016 #24
Does that include the innocent Women of Iraq and Libya who have been killed in the most bvar22 May 2016 #28
I forgot how you all consider Hillary... yallerdawg May 2016 #33
Hillary was a strong advocate for REgime Change including the use of military force in Libya. bvar22 May 2016 #45
Odd how she's not responsible for all the negative shit/ wrong decisions ...but anything positive, AzDar May 2016 #46
This lifelong Union labor FDR Democrat will defer to my own judgement. nt silvershadow May 2016 #10
No mention of the vast gulf that exists between them on foreign policy JonLeibowitz May 2016 #11
Her 'response' to environmentalists Eric J in MN May 2016 #12
Ahh, clean coal... Dragonfli May 2016 #30
God, what drivel kaleckim May 2016 #13
She's about as progressive as Nixon. hobbit709 May 2016 #14
allow me ..... Exilednight May 2016 #16
Yes. The Congressional Progressive Caucus has only one Senator. Eric J in MN May 2016 #18
Yeah, and Reagan was a liberal too. jalan48 May 2016 #17
You can't use history as an etched-in-stone benchmark. CrowCityDem May 2016 #19
We won't hear from Republicans how far to the right she is! yallerdawg May 2016 #21
If FDR, JFK, RFK, or LBJ rose from the grave and listened to Hillary, bvar22 May 2016 #34
That highlighted stuff. That does sound like Hillary. yallerdawg May 2016 #36
No you are clueless and deep into the koolaid. Thanks Bvar, eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #41
No. YOU are confused. bvar22 May 2016 #49
Good article.. I am sure it will fall on deaf ears here. DCBob May 2016 #20
I take it they won't be voting for Hillary - ever. yallerdawg May 2016 #22
connerie whatchamacallit May 2016 #23
Blah Blah Blah colsohlibgal May 2016 #25
If Hillary was a progressive, people wouldn't need to be told she was over and over again. Vinca May 2016 #26
This is "Democratic Underground." yallerdawg May 2016 #27
+1 (NT) Eric J in MN May 2016 #47
. Dragonfli May 2016 #29
Bernie is "center left." yallerdawg May 2016 #32
That is true, Right and Left have well defined and firm meanings. Dragonfli May 2016 #38
Cool! Where can I get the original on this? boomer55 May 2016 #42
Here: Dragonfli May 2016 #43
Fair and objective, are they? yallerdawg May 2016 #51
Yes. Dragonfli May 2016 #52
Can you name a position he takes kaleckim May 2016 #54
See you all think Progressive means TimPlo May 2016 #31
How can she be equally responsive to two opposing forces? Armstead May 2016 #35
No she isn't. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #37
That word you're using doesn't mean what you think it does. boomer55 May 2016 #40
CNN: Clinton 'pleads guilty' to being a moderate RufusTFirefly May 2016 #44
K&R mcar May 2016 #48
To the right of Nixon doesn't exactly qualify as "progressive." pat_k May 2016 #50
Hillary is to "progressive what a Twinkie is to nutrition or decaf is to coffee. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #53
K&R betsuni May 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Is A Prog...»Reply #50