Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Nothing to see here, folks. The Clinton Foundation is all about Good Works, [View all]truedelphi
(32,324 posts)82. Good lead. And of course, most "Charrity" Foundations do not have a Mr Giustra
Last edited Mon May 9, 2016, 04:43 PM - Edit history (1)
As an "Entrepreneurial Partner." That one guy is a piece of work.
From Kissinger to Giustra, the Clintons have some mighty strange bedfellows.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nothing to see here, folks. The Clinton Foundation is all about Good Works, [View all]
truedelphi
May 2016
OP
Due to indications from a moderator that this is to be in General Discussion, I re-posted it
truedelphi
May 2016
#1
Here is another one.. IBTimes "Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's St
Baobab
May 2016
#22
Fracking, Weapons, Uranium, what other wonderful things do those Foundations do?
CentralCoaster
May 2016
#26
And any of us still American enough to cry when exposed to the onion's slicing
truedelphi
May 2016
#54
No, Paul Thompson is this year's Glen Beck or Jerome Corsi. Look for his next 'book'
COLGATE4
May 2016
#8
Is that the same New York Times that withheld the NSA domestic ops story until after 2004 election?
Octafish
May 2016
#20
The issue is not simply a matter of neutrality, but not falling into line with Republicans.
procon
May 2016
#25
And Cayman. And shell companies. And probably Panama Papers. And, absent evidence
silvershadow
May 2016
#19
Dontcha love charities where those at the top make skajillions of millions of dollars?
Vote2016
May 2016
#24
Jealously does not get you any awards but I would rather have the Clintons helping others
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#27
So you call 89% small, that was the 89% I was talking about. I am quiet familiar with
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#72
Bernie Madoff was doing a ponzi scheme. That would not be rumor mongering
The Second Stone
May 2016
#37
In our progressive attempts to defeat the RW neocons now running the Democratic Party
truedelphi
May 2016
#61
You clearly don't understand the differences between a public and private charity.
randome
May 2016
#45
Your accusation of 'money laundering' implies that the Clintons personally benefit from this.
randome
May 2016
#64
When Hilary and Bill are back in the White House, they will write operas about
immoderate
May 2016
#48
Let's ask ourelves a pertinent question - one we don't really have the answer to.
truedelphi
May 2016
#73
Good lead. And of course, most "Charrity" Foundations do not have a Mr Giustra
truedelphi
May 2016
#82