Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Under FBI Investigation For More Than Email: [View all]Demsrule86
(71,550 posts)66. Doing your best to not
have a Democrat in the white house in 16...even for you to post basically a mercenary link is pretty ridiculous...exactly how does right Wing retired FBI who worked in Houston know jack about jack? He now runs a questionable security outfit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No link...the attempt to make sure a Democrat isnt in the WH next year is amazing
Jackie Wilson Said
May 2016
#1
http://www.pnhpillinois.org/pipermail/activists_healthcareil.org/2009-August/date.html
Baobab
May 2016
#95
This could have easily been avoided if Hillary would have used government email.
NWCorona
May 2016
#6
Nah, could have avoided this non story if there wasnt a massive conspiray
Jackie Wilson Said
May 2016
#9
Between the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" and the "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"...
NewImproved Deal
May 2016
#32
but another article quotes NYT saying HRC gets her military advice from Fox News pundit:
amborin
May 2016
#96
It's already being done... House Repubs are meeting to discuss this very process.
berni_mccoy
May 2016
#64
But he is NOT an FBI agent, he is NOT involved in the investigation, and has no "source"...
George II
May 2016
#48
As, so at least you admit that this article is NOT based on fact, but "opinion". Pretty much...
George II
May 2016
#76
How so, because he once was an FBI agent? What is the source of h is "knowledge?
George II
May 2016
#49
I don't doubt your first statement, but how does he know the details of that so-called....
George II
May 2016
#74
Inquisitor is not the only source for the Clinton Foundation's shady dealings while Hillary was
Seeinghope
May 2016
#86
There is no substance to Emailgate, muh less the other sensatioalizt nonsense screamed about
Tarc
May 2016
#65
Excellent deflection, either you missed my point or didn't want to acknowledge it.
George II
May 2016
#71
I already was specific, Hillary Clinton is NOT under FBI investigation. As for "messenger"?
George II
May 2016
#78
I was specific as possible, pointing out who the investigation was NOT about. Remember, I'm not....
George II
May 2016
#81
It's pretty hard to be specific...zero fact?...unicorns and ponies. I get it.
libdem4life
May 2016
#82
As soon as this investigation is over they will have time to investigate campaign fund fraud and
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#42
For the 8 millionth time here, Hillary Clinton is NOT "under FBI investigation" for either mails or.
George II
May 2016
#43
Oh no one doubts that it is an investigation, but what exactly is the SUBJECT of that investigation?
George II
May 2016
#73
If you are the one telling us what the investigation isn't about, shouldn't you be the
rhett o rick
May 2016
#88
I didn't raise this "issue", someone else did. And one would think that person would be....
George II
May 2016
#107
Seems you are using the "depends on what the definition of "is" is." Here's what the FBI say:
rhett o rick
May 2016
#108
Back up a claim that something doesn't exist? I don't see ANYONE "backing up" the "bullshit" (your..
George II
May 2016
#72