Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tarc

(10,601 posts)
97. There isn't a sigle Bernie suppoerters here who actually cares about gov't e-mail security
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:00 AM
May 2016

or is even terribly knowledgeable about the subject at all...I particularly loved the one guy the other day who kept using "cyber", like it was 1999.

This has been a political card to play for them, nothing more.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This has the making of a really fun thread. hrmjustin May 2016 #1
Snowden is in exile StarTrombone May 2016 #2
My point is that cheerleading Snowden like Greenwald and company do, while YouDig May 2016 #4
Because they wanted to expose illegal activity? Matariki May 2016 #10
In case you were wondering Ned_Devine May 2016 #34
Ah, yeah Matariki May 2016 #61
5th amendment still applies to us all scscholar May 2016 #55
How utterly ridiculous. Unfathomably and willfully illogical. bjo59 May 2016 #14
Hillary didn't pass on any classified information. Snowden did. YouDig May 2016 #19
They're also still holding out hope that an indictment will get Sanders the nomination brush May 2016 #31
"I build the straw men and then knock them the fuck down!" morningfog May 2016 #3
LOL Art_from_Ark May 2016 #16
Ridiculous comparison. HassleCat May 2016 #5
It is. Snowden and Manning committed serious crimes. On purpose. YouDig May 2016 #8
How "many others" had a private server? SwampG8r May 2016 #12
Condi Rice, Colin Powell used private email accounts, for example. YouDig May 2016 #23
No no dont distract i asked how many had private servers SwampG8r May 2016 #33
A private server versus gmail or hotmail is not much different. YouDig May 2016 #36
You really need to come to one of my company's cyber security training classes. Fawke Em May 2016 #49
If that's where you're getting your ideas, then I suggest looking for another employer. YouDig May 2016 #52
LMAO! Fawke Em May 2016 #66
I bet you are. It's easier than recognizing the truth. YouDig May 2016 #69
More shit you don't understand. Fawke Em May 2016 #78
When proven wrong play the trump card SwampG8r May 2016 #68
I wouldn't know about being proven wrong. YouDig May 2016 #72
Im more embarrassed.by SwampG8r May 2016 #73
People say they are voting Trump or third party, what other explanation is there? YouDig May 2016 #74
People here on du? SwampG8r May 2016 #84
Hotmail and Gmail accounts are semi-secure, a private stand-alone server is completely insecure! TheBlackAdder May 2016 #82
Unencrypted to boot SwampG8r May 2016 #86
recently, Walker had a second 'fully secret server' & info squashed by layers of Lawyers. Romney Sunlei May 2016 #95
Clinton authored and sent classified and top secret emails on her server 2cannan May 2016 #22
Based on some nutjob blog on the internet? Ha. YouDig May 2016 #25
No she didn't. That's a nutty conspiracy blog you're citing. YouDig May 2016 #46
Really. Take a few cyber security classes. Fawke Em May 2016 #51
The quote is from the NY Times. nt 2cannan May 2016 #54
But the quote doesn't say what the nutcase who wrote the blog claims. YouDig May 2016 #56
Paul wrote no commentary throughout the timeline. Fawke Em May 2016 #67
You won the jury. Tarheel_Dem May 2016 #87
You just said it yourself. HassleCat May 2016 #43
So you think Snowden should be prosecuted for whistle-blowing as was Manning? KPN May 2016 #60
So sayeth yet another one who joined in mid-April and is pushing the same meme. arcane1 May 2016 #6
LOL Art_from_Ark May 2016 #76
False equivalency. hellofromreddit May 2016 #7
Authoritarians don't like whistle-blowers. HooptieWagon May 2016 #9
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #18
Why are y'all so desperate? vintx May 2016 #11
Yes. Not very "presidential" of them, is it? n/t RufusTFirefly May 2016 #77
2-5 Leave. Agschmid May 2016 #13
non sequitur - two very different things. hollysmom May 2016 #15
ROFLMAO! hootinholler May 2016 #17
Are they running for President? Either of them? Autumn May 2016 #20
What Snowden and Manning did is not the same as what Hillary did. YouDig May 2016 #21
Wanna share your FBI report since you seem to have an advance copy? Autumn May 2016 #27
Wow pmorlan1 May 2016 #28
Of course you're against Snowden and Manning. Broward May 2016 #32
This pretty much applies to you as well. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #24
The personal attack. YouDig May 2016 #26
As opposed to the blanket attack. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #29
Yes this new-found concern for Teh National Securah-T is touching. ucrdem May 2016 #30
Im not upset about the email server AgingAmerican May 2016 #35
Hillary is incompetent - she should drop out Rass May 2016 #37
Desperation makes people do crazy things. YouDig May 2016 #38
Or that a legal warrant is illegal. ucrdem May 2016 #39
Might want to rethink that illegal legal warrant business. ucrdem May 2016 #40
clarification: The illegality of the spying program was affirmed by a court Rass May 2016 #45
What's the pay difference between posting a topic and posting a reply? Loudestlib May 2016 #41
No evidence of her server being hacked, the .Gov Snowden purposely copied Thinkingabout May 2016 #42
Her email server was hacked Rass May 2016 #50
Oh, that one, not proven yet, I could claim the same also. Thinkingabout May 2016 #53
FBI Interview --------->FBI<------------ Rass May 2016 #63
Yes you did, so he gives a story in exchange for what? Thinkingabout May 2016 #75
Lots of secrecy due to the investigation Rass May 2016 #81
Wrong. Fawke Em May 2016 #44
All criminals have excuses. Either you care about government secrets or you don't. YouDig May 2016 #48
I think both Trump and Clinton are equally dangerous but for different reasons. Fawke Em May 2016 #57
That's insane. YouDig May 2016 #58
I think it's insane to vote for a person under a criminal investigation. Fawke Em May 2016 #80
Not only under a criminal investigation, Art_from_Ark May 2016 #85
The public's right to know Rass May 2016 #59
she is indeed a massive hypocrite, since she has pilloried Snowden and Manning, while undermining Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #64
^^^RIGHT HERE^^^ MrMickeysMom May 2016 #83
Political opportunism Dem2 May 2016 #47
Your point is well taken and I don't care about the email server Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #62
Does the sword cut both ways here? JVS May 2016 #65
Thanks for confirming that logic is no longer taught. Kip Humphrey May 2016 #70
No, Snowden was trying to expose goverment wrongdoing. Vattel May 2016 #71
I can dig it! cheapdate May 2016 #79
nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #88
Manning exposed child sex trafficking by a Virginia based private military contractor Ash_F May 2016 #89
That is the stupidest example of conflation and false equivalency in one line WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #90
I wonder why she wanted to keep her own email private but wants a manhattan project Warren DeMontague May 2016 #91
More pretzel logic from the "right is the new left" crowd. PowerToThePeople May 2016 #92
Wrong. VulgarPoet May 2016 #93
Wish the Gov. would go after 'who' got Snowden the cushie job with the access to millions of files. Sunlei May 2016 #94
Recommended! tk2kewl May 2016 #96
There isn't a sigle Bernie suppoerters here who actually cares about gov't e-mail security Tarc May 2016 #97
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you're upset about the...»Reply #97