Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wall street hates uncertainty. Donald drumpf does also as an investor, but as a Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #1
Hillary supporters ciaobaby May 2016 #2
I'm sorry, but that's a dumb comment CajunBlazer May 2016 #6
Rationalize much ? ciaobaby May 2016 #8
No, is about not being stupid... CajunBlazer May 2016 #19
I just love this ciaobaby May 2016 #23
Maybe so CajunBlazer May 2016 #25
Bottom line ciaobaby May 2016 #30
Enjoy your purity. It will keep you warm through the many nights COLGATE4 May 2016 #32
LOL !! Spot on Ferd Berfel May 2016 #39
Corporations do not generally give to campaigns out of a sense of civic durty Armstead May 2016 #9
No, they do so out of selfish self interest and/or personal idealogy CajunBlazer May 2016 #18
It's weird how few people here seem to understand that (nt) Recursion May 2016 #21
No, it isn't weird at all CajunBlazer May 2016 #22
Not parroting Sanders - He is expressing what we believe Armstead May 2016 #31
Point taken.... CajunBlazer May 2016 #35
A (reasonable) point of disagreement Armstead May 2016 #36
Basically agree CajunBlazer May 2016 #38
A few points Armstead May 2016 #41
I guess I will have to grudgingly admit... CajunBlazer May 2016 #42
I have a more charitable view...but basically agree on that Armstead May 2016 #44
Well, we are in agreement then. CajunBlazer May 2016 #45
Absolutely not. We are in a Citizens United world, and Hillary's opponent will be going after anotherproletariat May 2016 #10
why is that these rants always end up (or start out) with "poor Hillary" ? ciaobaby May 2016 #12
Mine didn't...not sure what you are referring to... nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #13
your last line..... ciaobaby May 2016 #14
Do your homework. The case was about an attack documentary on Hillary. anotherproletariat May 2016 #15
AGAIN - poor poor Hillary - another attack on Hillary- I sympathize, really I do. ciaobaby May 2016 #16
Really? Do you know anything about the Citizens United v. FEC case? anotherproletariat May 2016 #17
Relax, CajunBlazer May 2016 #24
Bullshit Dem2 May 2016 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #3
Good, we'll need the money for the general election CajunBlazer May 2016 #4
To the average voter that big money is not a good sign. It jwirr May 2016 #5
This is why we choose the party we want to affiliate ourselves with. I trust that any Democrat would anotherproletariat May 2016 #11
Then the average voters are stupid to put thier faith.... CajunBlazer May 2016 #27
They aren't walking away from all that equity... AzDar May 2016 #7
Get it girl, good for her.. no need to go to a tank battle on a horse. uponit7771 May 2016 #20
25 replies and I see 3 of them. Nyan May 2016 #26
Your statement make no sense CajunBlazer May 2016 #28
SCOTUS should clean up this mess! >:| LeftRant May 2016 #29
Yeah. I'm sure they'll get right on it. COLGATE4 May 2016 #33
That's why I'm going to be voting for the candidate that wants the SC to overturn it. DookDook May 2016 #37
Did you know that Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs is a big liberal? CajunBlazer May 2016 #40
Well the grassroots don't like her so I suppose she'll got to her constituents. Attorney in Texas May 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton reaping d...»Reply #34