Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)WSJ - "Saved by the Superdelegates: Sanders keeps beating Clinton, who looks weaker against Trump" [View all]
As Bernie said, it is undemocratic to pronounce this race as over. Voters do not pick the nominee. Delegates do. This is why Jeff Weaver hit the nail on the head when noted that superdelegates will ultimately decide nomination.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/saved-by-the-superdelegates-1463008755
If you think the 2016 presidential campaign is already wild, imagine where wed be without Democratic superdelegates. Bernie Sanders might be the next President.
The 74-year-old socialist won West Virginias primary on Tuesday, his 19th victory and second in a row. He still trails Hillary Clinton 1,719 to 1,425 in bound delegates, by CNNs count, but hes won a majority of the delegates since March 1. If he sweeps the final 10 primaries and caucuses, he might take the lead among bound delegates heading into the Democratic convention in July.
But then there are the superdelegates, the Democratic officeholders who can vote their preference and who overwhelmingly favor Mrs. Clinton. Of the 712 superdelegates, CNN counts 516 for the former first lady and 41 for the forlorn Senator from Vermont. This means she needs only 148 more delegates to clinch a majority for the nomination. As the primary season ends, Democratic voters are exhibiting a profound case of buyers remorse about Mrs. Clinton as their nominee, but shes being rescued by the establishment.
* * *
Mrs. Clinton has proven to be a lousy candidate, unappealing even to millions of Democrats. Mr. Trump is probably the weakest candidate Republicans could nominate, yet could Mrs. Clinton be the one Democrat who could lose to Mr. Trump? Maybe Democrats should consider a contested convention.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
43 replies, 3689 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (50)
ReplyReply to this post
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
WSJ - "Saved by the Superdelegates: Sanders keeps beating Clinton, who looks weaker against Trump" [View all]
TomCADem
May 2016
OP
She may just be the most unelectable candidate in history when you factor in all her baggage.
coffeeAM
May 2016
#3
His baggage has not been talked about by either Hillary or Trump. She is more decent than he is.
Jitter65
May 2016
#11
Wow, I can't believe that a rational person can actually say that. Hillary supports wars
rhett o rick
May 2016
#43
She betrayed her own Party and the people of the US and the people of Iraq and why?
rhett o rick
May 2016
#8
Time for "Guess the Point". If you want to give me a lecture, go ahead without the questions.
rhett o rick
May 2016
#42
Media loves Trump, Clinton's under investigation, has tons and tons of baggage.
CentralCoaster
May 2016
#7
Do you know the "supposed" purpose of superdelegates? I do, and it isn't so they can be purchased or
Dragonfli
May 2016
#12
I see no need to make this an either/or. it takes BOTH Supers and Pledged to win
99th_Monkey
May 2016
#18
The Iron Triangle prevails, lobbyist delegates will support the candidate protecting their interests
TheBlackAdder
May 2016
#21
"... it is undemocratic to pronounce this race as over. Voters do not pick the nominee. ...
pampango
May 2016
#20
"Mrs. Clinton has proven to be a lousy candidate, unappealing even to millions of Democrats."
LWolf
May 2016
#22
Yes Democrats Listen to the Wall Street Journal - A real Beacon of Truth!!! /sacrcasm
BootinUp
May 2016
#40