2016 Postmortem

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)

8. Unfortunately, they will be using "free speech zones" chained off areas far from where any

Reply to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #1)

Sun May 15, 2016, 02:35 AM

May 2016

in the convention will have to look at or even be able to hear us mere serfs.
They have thought of everything.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary's Lackey Just Ignored Multiple Motions, Adjourned, and FLED Out The Back... [View all] AzDar May 2016 OP

I hope they take up this conversation in Philadelphia. The street outside if necessary. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #1

They are begging for that, apparently... The corruption is so BLATANT! AzDar May 2016 #2

Unfortunately, they will be using "free speech zones" chained off areas far from where any Dragonfli May 2016 #8

This country was based on the consent of the governed. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #13

We have never consented to it but they have been doing it since the Bush years anyway, unfair I know Dragonfli May 2016 #15

Not Any More - The Country Is Now Run By The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks cantbeserious May 2016 #41

More information would really help. senz May 2016 #3

Hope there's more on this soon. bvf May 2016 #5

Okay, there's more info in adjacent OPs. senz May 2016 #6

Video works for me... you have to hit the 'play' button, as LiveStream ended... AzDar May 2016 #7

Well of course. But it didn't work. It's okay, I'm putting it together senz May 2016 #10

It finally kicked in, AzDar, and I saw it. senz May 2016 #23

Oh look, Brown shirts Fairgo May 2016 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Dragonfli May 2016 #12

This Video @ 11:45... Roberta Adjourns And Flees, Despite Multiple Legitimate Motions... AzDar May 2016 #9

this grasswire May 2016 #11

The face of the Clinton Machine. The face of Fascism... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #30

I must hand it to her, the lady has guts, but.... wundermaus May 2016 #33

The beef is with the procedural issues, right? Everyone agrees with Clinton winning more delegates Corporate666 May 2016 #14

Bernie had 58 delegates disqualified, which made the difference jfern May 2016 #16

1% joshcryer May 2016 #18

Nope, all 58 were Bernie jfern May 2016 #22

Even if that were true, which someone already said it is not, why would anyone complain cui bono May 2016 #67

And 6 who were originally DQ'ed were allowed in Corporate666 May 2016 #21

You are getting sleepy, Corporate666. Mesmerized by your own words. delrem May 2016 #26

Just pointing out truth Corporate666 May 2016 #34

64 delegates. Fawke Em May 2016 #29

People are pissed they couldn't flip the result gaming the caucus system. joshcryer May 2016 #17

Sounds like a damn good reason for taking out those Sanders delegates. delrem May 2016 #27

Sounds like a damn good reason to get rid of caucuses. joshcryer May 2016 #31

Perhaps, but your argument was that this move, which happened in a "caucus", delrem May 2016 #39

What? I think this is bullshit across the board. joshcryer May 2016 #44

You seem unaware of what you wrote in posts just a few minutes ago. delrem May 2016 #61

I don't see an inconsistency. joshcryer May 2016 #62

No, you said that caucus rules won the day against crooked Sanders delegates, delrem May 2016 #63

Well yeah, the shitty caucus rules managed to represent the will of the people. joshcryer May 2016 #65

That's quite some pretzel, joshcryer. You rock. delrem May 2016 #66

The caucus system is corrupt and undemocratic Dem2 May 2016 #69

Oh no, people are definitely arguing the outcome HerbChestnut May 2016 #19

Are you saying the rules don't allow delegates to be verified? Corporate666 May 2016 #25

I'm not talking about delegate eligibility HerbChestnut May 2016 #32

RCP has had her ahead 20-15 for some time Corporate666 May 2016 #37

Yeah, it's completely reasonable to refuse entry .99center May 2016 #53

Sanders supporters tried changing the rules without 2/3rds vote. joshcryer May 2016 #38

We had the 2/3 vote by voice vote. kiva May 2016 #40

Nope. joshcryer May 2016 #43

Actually loud was exactly how the voice votes were determined for the convention. kiva May 2016 #46

They weren't 2/3rds louder. joshcryer May 2016 #48

According to several people manning tables kiva May 2016 #54

No, it's not "obvious" that the Clintonites had a majority. Remember that they refused to count the w4rma May 2016 #42

A room count requires a 2/3rds vote. joshcryer May 2016 #45

Exactly. But, the Nevada establishment did just that and dared everyone to do something about it. nt w4rma May 2016 #58

First of all... HerbChestnut May 2016 #47

2/3rds of the vote would've been distinguishable. joshcryer May 2016 #50

But there was no vote HerbChestnut May 2016 #51

So you are fine with states where the superdelegates stole it? northernsouthern May 2016 #20

We keep hearing super delegates are uncommitted and can vote for whoever they want Corporate666 May 2016 #28

you are you lying or misinformed? northernsouthern May 2016 #56

The role of superdelegates BootinUp May 2016 #52

No that is incorrect. northernsouthern May 2016 #57

Actually not everyone believes she won the state..n/t tokenlib May 2016 #49

I do believe they're going to cheat all the way through. senz May 2016 #24

Link deepestblue May 2016 #35

Video - This should help clear things up about the travesty in NV this evening Chezboo May 2016 #36

How things went down in Nevada after 14 hours Chezboo May 2016 #59

This is really bad. If Democrats stonewall Sanders and supporters, they are going to lose. highprincipleswork May 2016 #55

They have been doing so in state after state this entire primary. stillwaiting May 2016 #68

Another link deepestblue May 2016 #60

By hook or by Crook madokie May 2016 #64

What is wrong with these people????? pdsimdars May 2016 #70

shortsightedness, borrowed power, giddiness at defeating the Enemy, which is MisterP May 2016 #72

7 figure salary can blind you to this nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #74

One thing came to mind though. . . . from the 60s. . . pdsimdars May 2016 #71

Look at that image folks nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #73

Brought To Us By Hillary Clinton And The DNC... AzDar May 2016 #75

Yes. dchill May 2016 #76

Yes. A pic of things to come. Duppers May 2016 #77

AzDar�The message in all this: �F--- off, you Bernie voters�and vote for us Ds in November!� CobaltBlue May 2016 #78