2016 Postmortem

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)

15. We have never consented to it but they have been doing it since the Bush years anyway, unfair I know

Reply to lumberjack_jeff (Reply #13)

Sun May 15, 2016, 02:58 AM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary's Lackey Just Ignored Multiple Motions, Adjourned, and FLED Out The Back... [View all] AzDar May 2016 OP

I hope they take up this conversation in Philadelphia. The street outside if necessary. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #1

They are begging for that, apparently... The corruption is so BLATANT! AzDar May 2016 #2

Unfortunately, they will be using "free speech zones" chained off areas far from where any Dragonfli May 2016 #8

This country was based on the consent of the governed. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #13

We have never consented to it but they have been doing it since the Bush years anyway, unfair I know Dragonfli May 2016 #15

Not Any More - The Country Is Now Run By The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks cantbeserious May 2016 #41

More information would really help. senz May 2016 #3

Hope there's more on this soon. bvf May 2016 #5

Okay, there's more info in adjacent OPs. senz May 2016 #6

Video works for me... you have to hit the 'play' button, as LiveStream ended... AzDar May 2016 #7

Well of course. But it didn't work. It's okay, I'm putting it together senz May 2016 #10

It finally kicked in, AzDar, and I saw it. senz May 2016 #23

Oh look, Brown shirts Fairgo May 2016 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Dragonfli May 2016 #12

This Video @ 11:45... Roberta Adjourns And Flees, Despite Multiple Legitimate Motions... AzDar May 2016 #9

this grasswire May 2016 #11

The face of the Clinton Machine. The face of Fascism... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #30

I must hand it to her, the lady has guts, but.... wundermaus May 2016 #33

The beef is with the procedural issues, right? Everyone agrees with Clinton winning more delegates Corporate666 May 2016 #14

Bernie had 58 delegates disqualified, which made the difference jfern May 2016 #16

1% joshcryer May 2016 #18

Nope, all 58 were Bernie jfern May 2016 #22

Even if that were true, which someone already said it is not, why would anyone complain cui bono May 2016 #67

And 6 who were originally DQ'ed were allowed in Corporate666 May 2016 #21

You are getting sleepy, Corporate666. Mesmerized by your own words. delrem May 2016 #26

Just pointing out truth Corporate666 May 2016 #34

64 delegates. Fawke Em May 2016 #29

People are pissed they couldn't flip the result gaming the caucus system. joshcryer May 2016 #17

Sounds like a damn good reason for taking out those Sanders delegates. delrem May 2016 #27

Sounds like a damn good reason to get rid of caucuses. joshcryer May 2016 #31

Perhaps, but your argument was that this move, which happened in a "caucus", delrem May 2016 #39

What? I think this is bullshit across the board. joshcryer May 2016 #44

You seem unaware of what you wrote in posts just a few minutes ago. delrem May 2016 #61

I don't see an inconsistency. joshcryer May 2016 #62

No, you said that caucus rules won the day against crooked Sanders delegates, delrem May 2016 #63

Well yeah, the shitty caucus rules managed to represent the will of the people. joshcryer May 2016 #65

That's quite some pretzel, joshcryer. You rock. delrem May 2016 #66

The caucus system is corrupt and undemocratic Dem2 May 2016 #69

Oh no, people are definitely arguing the outcome HerbChestnut May 2016 #19

Are you saying the rules don't allow delegates to be verified? Corporate666 May 2016 #25

I'm not talking about delegate eligibility HerbChestnut May 2016 #32

RCP has had her ahead 20-15 for some time Corporate666 May 2016 #37

Yeah, it's completely reasonable to refuse entry .99center May 2016 #53

Sanders supporters tried changing the rules without 2/3rds vote. joshcryer May 2016 #38

We had the 2/3 vote by voice vote. kiva May 2016 #40

Nope. joshcryer May 2016 #43

Actually loud was exactly how the voice votes were determined for the convention. kiva May 2016 #46

They weren't 2/3rds louder. joshcryer May 2016 #48

According to several people manning tables kiva May 2016 #54

No, it's not "obvious" that the Clintonites had a majority. Remember that they refused to count the w4rma May 2016 #42

A room count requires a 2/3rds vote. joshcryer May 2016 #45

Exactly. But, the Nevada establishment did just that and dared everyone to do something about it. nt w4rma May 2016 #58

First of all... HerbChestnut May 2016 #47

2/3rds of the vote would've been distinguishable. joshcryer May 2016 #50

But there was no vote HerbChestnut May 2016 #51

So you are fine with states where the superdelegates stole it? northernsouthern May 2016 #20

We keep hearing super delegates are uncommitted and can vote for whoever they want Corporate666 May 2016 #28

you are you lying or misinformed? northernsouthern May 2016 #56

The role of superdelegates BootinUp May 2016 #52

No that is incorrect. northernsouthern May 2016 #57

Actually not everyone believes she won the state..n/t tokenlib May 2016 #49

I do believe they're going to cheat all the way through. senz May 2016 #24

Link deepestblue May 2016 #35

Video - This should help clear things up about the travesty in NV this evening Chezboo May 2016 #36

How things went down in Nevada after 14 hours Chezboo May 2016 #59

This is really bad. If Democrats stonewall Sanders and supporters, they are going to lose. highprincipleswork May 2016 #55

They have been doing so in state after state this entire primary. stillwaiting May 2016 #68

Another link deepestblue May 2016 #60

By hook or by Crook madokie May 2016 #64

What is wrong with these people????? pdsimdars May 2016 #70

shortsightedness, borrowed power, giddiness at defeating the Enemy, which is MisterP May 2016 #72

7 figure salary can blind you to this nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #74

One thing came to mind though. . . . from the 60s. . . pdsimdars May 2016 #71

Look at that image folks nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #73

Brought To Us By Hillary Clinton And The DNC... AzDar May 2016 #75

Yes. dchill May 2016 #76

Yes. A pic of things to come. Duppers May 2016 #77

AzDar�The message in all this: �F--- off, you Bernie voters�and vote for us Ds in November!� CobaltBlue May 2016 #78