Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I just read why 64 Bernie NV delegates had their credentials stripped--and I shed a tear or two [View all]
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)42. Thank you for bringing up this point!
If the Clinton camp has been cheating from state to state--that means that she has phantom support. Rigging voting machines to give you votes you didn't earn, means the support isn't there. Blocking your opponent's supporters from voting via registration switching, voter suppression and six-hour wait lines--means that you are a weak candidate.
So what happens in the GE? Such a great point.
When the first states voted in our primary, there was a great deal of discussion about how our Democratic voter turnout was very low. I know that the caucus numbers in my state of Iowa, were down 30 percent. It was also noteworthy that Republican turnout was at record-levels. So...that's also a factor.
What is she planning on doing if she's the nominee? She'll have to continue cheating more, but on a grander scale? No way can a person get away with that!
We're on our way to a civil war in this country.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
355 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I just read why 64 Bernie NV delegates had their credentials stripped--and I shed a tear or two [View all]
CoffeeCat
May 2016
OP
The Perpetrators of Such CRIMINALITY Expect US To Vote for You Know Who In The GE?
CorporatistNation
May 2016
#137
So you voted in the Democratic caucus in Feb,and by May 1st your registration was switched to Repub?
virtualobserver
May 2016
#3
Our party has a long history that include three major realignments and 3 minor ones
Dragonfli
May 2016
#18
I agree with asking that they provide data on when and how it was changed.
LiberalFighter
May 2016
#95
Sanders camp fucks up registratrion, steals data, has wrong message for dem base & is not his fault
uponit7771
May 2016
#7
coffecat did not fuck up her registration...god this is getting so pathetic. The system
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#8
Accessing the DNC's data does not permit someone to change voter registrations . . .
markpkessinger
May 2016
#146
But the data WERE searched and saved by Bernie's campaign -- saved to a Bernie part of the system.
pnwmom
May 2016
#185
I'm not lying. The data was not exported somewhere else but it WAS saved within the system
pnwmom
May 2016
#208
You could stop rolling those eyes long enough to actually read the post you're replying to.
surrealAmerican
May 2016
#108
Irrespective of the access to the Clinton campaign's proprietary data . . .
markpkessinger
May 2016
#148
There is a connection somewhere in the states affected by flipped registrations.
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#155
Sometimes when I go to a website I have not visited for a while, especially one where I
tblue37
May 2016
#121
When appropriate, Clinton folk have the right and the ability to make a fuss...
libdem4life
May 2016
#127
Sounds pretty far-fetched to me. Why would a delegate change their own registration?
KPN
May 2016
#134
Welcome to the ever growing club, I was a Registered Democrat for 37 years until I wasn't
Dragonfli
May 2016
#14
If you have yet to vote in a closed primary a chance exists it has already been changed for you
Dragonfli
May 2016
#21
Do not do what they want you to do, which is to stay independent or leave the Democratic Party.
w4rma
May 2016
#25
Yeah, wait till after the convention. No sense giving them what they want right now.
KPN
May 2016
#138
Yes and the Hillary Democratic Party is looking more & more like him & his merry band!
emsimon33
May 2016
#37
Why would the Hillary camp need to do this? There is nothing to gain. A more likely scenario is
still_one
May 2016
#53
I disagree. She is currently ahead, there is absolutely no motive for her to do this. If someone's
still_one
May 2016
#63
Accusations are being made that people who have been registered for years, have had their
still_one
May 2016
#48
At least in the Florida case you mentioned that involved people not reading the DMV application
still_one
May 2016
#64
There is something really fucked up going on here. It really makes no sense for the Clinton camp to
still_one
May 2016
#47
I read your longer post. Except that these flips are disenfranchising Bernie supporters
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#158
Clinton campaign motto: I, and my surrogates, have and will continue to LIE, CHEAT and STEAL. nt
nc4bo
May 2016
#68
Here is the Reason for why one Bernie delegate did not get the credentials--She changed her
riversedge
May 2016
#79
Are you operating under the illusion that the governor himself is the only one with access?
jeff47
May 2016
#170
THIS is what enabled massive countrywide Voter-Affiliation-Switching and what happened to you:
Kip Humphrey
May 2016
#86
Makes you not believe in those "3 million vote margins" certain people keep bragging about.
reformist2
May 2016
#132
If the Hillary campaign has to win like this - as in NY - she will never be the legitimate candidate
leveymg
May 2016
#106
These 'delegates' had not registered as Democrats. They did it too themselves. Stop blaming
riversedge
Jun 2016
#351
Anyone can fill out a registration form & switch people. Its time our Voter regs have NO PARTY.
Sunlei
May 2016
#125
Just like Wall Street, the political game is rigged. you cite a perfect example.
EndElectoral
May 2016
#130
Follow the rules. That simple. * were able to give the info needed, and seated. 58 were not able to
seabeyond
May 2016
#145
what info were they required to give because I haven't seen it. If it comes out that
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#156
Some weren't registered Democrats. Most didn't have the info needed and were required to have.
seabeyond
May 2016
#157
That makes no sense. DOB is on a license so is address and how do you know some
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#162
Cheated you, .... they cheated you. Bad Clinton. Ya, I get it. Sanders and people have done thru
seabeyond
May 2016
#178
Hands down on the investigation, it is people that refused or too ignorant to follow the rules.
seabeyond
May 2016
#179
Again, what part of "registration changed without my knowledge" is in the rules?
jeff47
May 2016
#215
Okay, now that we agree that the fix is in and the primaries, like dead fish, stink from the head
mikehiggins
May 2016
#154
This is being done by Republicans to get us fighting amongst ourselves and to provide cover
Ohioblue22
May 2016
#163
How do you know it was Hillary who switched your registration to Republican and not Donald?
R B Garr
May 2016
#196
Thanks for confirming you weren't asking a question and were obviously just playing
R B Garr
May 2016
#271
lol, nice punt. Don't worry. It's obvious you were just getting around to insult me and
R B Garr
May 2016
#278
Oh, please! Insulting me was all your intention was. That and spreading another assinine
R B Garr
May 2016
#289
Laughable. You are doing nothing but tearing others down here. You've glommed on to
R B Garr
May 2016
#291
OFFS, you have OBVIOUSLY not even read what this OP said. DAYS ago this was over.
R B Garr
May 2016
#306
Desperation. This is a good example for others to see how far back people will go to
R B Garr
May 2016
#308
Hey, I too have had old, done with threads kicked up to with nothing comments.
seabeyond
May 2016
#311
Don't know what question is, was drawn to an old thread kicked. No, I won't bother.
seabeyond
May 2016
#317
Hi sea! It really looks like desperation to keep the insults going out of spite
R B Garr
May 2016
#313
You are probably right. That type of thinking just doesn't process well with me. Nt
seabeyond
May 2016
#322
I know what you mean. What's weird is taking a few days break here and coming
R B Garr
May 2016
#325
Sunday, May 22 was when you left off the last time with this petty obsession.
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#334
At least you admit your obsession. Although it's obvious from your first attack on May 17.
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#336
Thank you for your devotion since May 17th. This might be one for the Admins if you can't
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#344
I am in awe that you would use 10% of your total posts since you joined in 2009 just on me.
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#348
I am in awe that I am important enough you would use 10% of your account to dedicate your time
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#350
This is really important to you. Clearly. You kicked this thread twice for no reason.
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#353
This is clearly a very important goal for you. You seem to be really enjoying it.
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#355
I am reminded that this website was created as a reaction to a stolen election
me b zola
May 2016
#177
No. Do you have evidence that Hillary delegates have had their registration switched
Martin Eden
May 2016
#194
CoffeeCat—It sounds like a conspiracy between Democratic Party At Large and Hillary Clinton Campaign
CobaltBlue
May 2016
#200
I don't think he saw the other one but he said there might be more info not included since it was
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#231
Those 64 "delegates" were not registered Democrats, in fact some were not Nevada residents.
George II
May 2016
#247
The fact that Sanders had equal representation on the Credentials Committee doesn't count...
brooklynite
May 2016
#284
The 64 delegates were not seated due to their own or Bernie's campaign's fault...
Sancho
May 2016
#288