2016 Postmortem

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)

30. Right

Mon May 16, 2016, 10:47 AM

May 2016

Even when they screw themselves its "fraud and cheating."
They didn't register in NY.
And now, because they foolishly unregistered themselves as Dems to make a point, they screwed themselves in Nevada. Its Hillary and the DNC cheating.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

104 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's just so g-damned strange that accusations of election fraud [View all] boston bean May 2016 OP

That doesn't eliminate the possibility that fraud has occurred. Maybe it was really effective. hellofromreddit May 2016 #1

It does when every time Sanders lost, accusation be had, it is voters that would have voted Clinton seabeyond May 2016 #22

That's an entirely different (and better) argument than OP's. hellofromreddit May 2016 #25

My argument would be that the stakes are huge because of secret trade deals Baobab May 2016 #95

It follows the same pattern each time AgingAmerican May 2016 #55

Exactly that's the OP's answer...it is happening to register democrats who are Bernie bkkyosemite May 2016 #64

voter problems everywhere DLCWIdem May 2016 #84

Every time Sanders loses he sues and his fans act stupid. riversedge May 2016 #2

Right puffy socks May 2016 #30

Many long time dems had their affiliations flipped or changed. Stop with the they didn't bkkyosemite May 2016 #63

She won the Nevada caucaus on election day DLCWIdem May 2016 #76

+1000 stonecutter357 May 2016 #60

It's called stage 4... of 5. n/t lamp_shade May 2016 #3

Bernie is actually undefeated in 2016 Renew Deal May 2016 #4

Do you want a meaningful discussion on this issue or not? Baobab May 2016 #49

okay meaningful discussion DLCWIdem May 2016 #94

true MariaThinks May 2016 #82

Maybe cuz the whole "g-damned" establishment supports HRC jack_krass May 2016 #5

and changes the rules to suit their own selfish preferences. Betty Karlson May 2016 #10

Where is the Sanders campaign opinion on this? sufrommich May 2016 #11

Nina Turner made it VERY clear. Betty Karlson May 2016 #18

What did she make clear? She was literally at the sufrommich May 2016 #19

Democrats supporting Democrats. What a concept. Voters too. Sanders lost. Doesn't mean he lost seabeyond May 2016 #23

DINOs supporting DINOs jack_krass May 2016 #50

Democrats. You do not get to define. seabeyond May 2016 #51

Neither do you. hobbit709 May 2016 #97

Your post doesn't make sense. seabeyond May 2016 #100

Your own words "Democrats. You do not get to define." hobbit709 May 2016 #101

And still ???? seabeyond May 2016 #102

That everyone with experience, knowledge, and established history in the party Amimnoch May 2016 #71

Oh make no mistake. The fact that the entrenched "powers that be" jack_krass May 2016 #74

If you're correct, then the case for Bernie Sanders is even weaker. Amimnoch May 2016 #85

It would give him a bully pulpit to expose the problem, and start pushing solutions jack_krass May 2016 #93

It says 'rigged.' immoderate May 2016 #78

Not a surprise. Losses are ties....election fraud....Berniemath....Bernies Bizarro World. nt LexVegas May 2016 #6

pretty obvious really GreatGazoo May 2016 #7

How many of those fans in the stands are WhiteTara May 2016 #12

Even if it were 1 in 10 the gap is obvious SwampG8r May 2016 #17

In rallies or votes? WhiteTara May 2016 #21

Not really. Even the biggest rallies cosists of a very small sample of a state's population lunamagica May 2016 #41

And the smallest. dchill May 2016 #62

Ron Paul used to fill stadiums. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #24

So did mitt Romney lunamagica May 2016 #35

Ron Paul didn't fill stadiums like Bernie ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #45

Several posters have said that their children attended rallies, but didn't bother to vote. lunamagica May 2016 #38

Has the Sanders campaign filed formal charges with sufrommich May 2016 #8

Probably puffy socks May 2016 #34

Not true. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #9

Yes, so strange when the STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS DECERTIFIES DUE TO 'IRREGULARITIES'! ViseGrip May 2016 #13

When will the Sanders campaign be filing charges of election sufrommich May 2016 #16

What the heck is tampering with the FEC? Do you mean bribing the commissioners? merrily May 2016 #31

tampering with the FEC? frylock May 2016 #61

Facts. 6 or 8 of the 64 verified and allowed to seat. 8 Clinton were not verified and not allowed seabeyond May 2016 #28

Nope puffy socks May 2016 #37

Nice try but you're wasting your time. vintx May 2016 #59

This message was self-deleted by its author DLCWIdem May 2016 #86

Election Irregularities. Decertify. your talking about Baltimore did you bother to read article DLCWIdem May 2016 #87

Conspiracy! (Yep ... We're just that good! Hillary can do ANYTHING!) :-P NurseJackie May 2016 #14

I think you answered your own question. NWCorona May 2016 #15

Not strange at all. The party has never been united against one primary candidate before. merrily May 2016 #20

Sanders is not a Democrat. Attacks and insults Democrats. You all pissed cause Democrats do not seabeyond May 2016 #29

Not surprised at all. Beowulf May 2016 #33

Democrats, not establishment. That tired insult. Do not support Sanders,... You establishment!!! BS seabeyond May 2016 #40

I chose establishment for a reason Beowulf May 2016 #72

Many of those supporting Sanders are not Democrats and never have been, or will be, too. seabeyond May 2016 #73

Sanders is as much establishment as Clinton or more so. Beowulf May 2016 #79

In a body of govt that has power over others. Been in congress for working on 3 decades. seabeyond May 2016 #88

funny I thought it was independents that supported B.S. DLCWIdem May 2016 #89

I personally believe it is mostly Libertarians, baggers and anarchists. Not Repugs. seabeyond May 2016 #90

Ah, that"not a Democrat thing" is too played out and has been responded to too often merrily May 2016 #36

Fact is fact. Sanders accuses, fabricates, attacks and insults Democrats, while demanding the vote. seabeyond May 2016 #42

Apparently, you have no clue what "fact" means. Neither Sanders nor I demanded you vote for him. merrily May 2016 #46

+1000 stonecutter357 May 2016 #67

I'm confused. Did he not register as a Democrat to participate in this election? frylock May 2016 #65

He actually didn't register as a democrat because of the way glowing May 2016 #92

I'm thinking historically low voter turnout. frylock May 2016 #104

Yes you are. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #98

So he didn't register as a Democrat then? frylock May 2016 #103

read Baltimore article. It effects mayoral race DLCWIdem May 2016 #91

Hardly. You guys are the only ones with motive, opportunity... and that basic disposition. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #26

LOL ... BootinUp May 2016 #32

Leave him alone he's got a men's group to run. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #99

The Fraud In Nevada Was Recorded For All To See cantbeserious May 2016 #27

Why do Hillary Clinton suporters INdemo May 2016 #39

In particular, in Mass, Sanders supporters was right where Bill Clinton was standing, making video, Thinkingabout May 2016 #66

Election fraud perpetrated by one side and not the other would be my guess. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #43

+1 How come only the victim is complaining about theft? merrily May 2016 #48

manufactured victimhood at every turn Sheepshank May 2016 #68

"at every turn" or "Almost every time." Make up your mind. It either happens or it doesn't. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #69

ALMOST every time? At least that much honesty crept itn. merrily May 2016 #70

Generally that's how cheating goes AgingAmerican May 2016 #44

The sad part of this LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #47

We've always been concerned about election fraud. Bush-Gore-2000, Kerry-Bush 2004. Why stop now? EndElectoral May 2016 #52

sour grapes for starters.... beachbum bob May 2016 #53

That the Democratic establishment is backing Hillary kiva May 2016 #54

Yes, isn't it? That sore loser in 2000 made similar accusations RufusTFirefly May 2016 #56

Nothing to see here, folks. frylock May 2016 #57

seems predictable...right? Sheepshank May 2016 #58

Four individual users, twenty-five searches, eleven states, information downloaded. NCTraveler May 2016 #75

They simply can't fathom that he is not the chosen one by Democrats. apcalc May 2016 #77

so true. when he wins, there is no fraud. when he loses, it's all fraud. MariaThinks May 2016 #80

We should always be concerned about election fraud! B Calm May 2016 #81

She has manipulated the system... Yurovsky May 2016 #83

the side pulling the chicanery never complains. hobbit709 May 2016 #96