2016 Postmortem

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)

132. It was wrong when he did it

Wed May 18, 2016, 10:24 AM

May 2016

and it's wrong to repeat it. I work in mental health. We really don't need to go back to the days of using derogatory language toward the developmentally disabled and emotionally troubled, no matter in what context.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

187 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You are witnessing the first "Stochastic Smearjob" [View all] arendt May 2016 OP

It's funny that you think math is some kind of provocation against Bernie. YouDig May 2016 #1

... Ned_Devine May 2016 #26

Ignore him and he will go away. pangaia May 2016 #51

I have seen so frickin many arikara May 2016 #79

the script is quite fluent reddread May 2016 #122

Good to see the Brockster's getting his $1M worth bigbrother05 May 2016 #127

I wonder how much they get paid? KPN May 2016 #153

It's funny that you think math is some kind of provocation against Bernie. randome May 2016 #110

LMAO! Rockyj May 2016 #120

No doubt, you'll explain the implicit and objective relevance, yes? LanternWaste May 2016 #137

It speaks for itself Ned_Devine May 2016 #144

That plan to put paid trolls for Hillary on the Internet bvar22 May 2016 #164

NO! THIS Guy's ENTIRE POST IS SPOT Fu**ing ON! CorporatistNation May 2016 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #116

scrubba scrub scrub three billionaire media moguls in a tub reddread May 2016 #123

The video proof remains. senz May 2016 #171

That poster is a troll and is not here for discussion. They have a role to play. arcane1 May 2016 #126

It is Progressive dog May 2016 #107

I thought the same thing Brainstormy May 2016 #121

Yup. Math is the enemy to Bernie and his supporters! nt stevenleser May 2016 #139

LOL! Best DU reply of the day. underthematrix May 2016 #161

Speaking of math... 844 posts in 30 days? Scootaloo May 2016 #166

Bernie people are good at counting posts. If only they put those skills towards counting delegates. YouDig May 2016 #174

Yeah, I've seen you post that before Scootaloo May 2016 #175

Following me around, huh? Yeah, I seem to get that. Lots of people into my post number. YouDig May 2016 #176

welcome! G_j May 2016 #173

Makes me so sick. Good breakdown. Thanks for the post. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #2

Except that Clinton won on election day. brush May 2016 #57

This message was self-deleted by its author Ed Suspicious May 2016 #59

Don't forget to make sure Independents can never vote. passiveporcupine May 2016 #60

Meaning what? brush May 2016 #73

this speaks for itself. passiveporcupine May 2016 #75

Did you not understand? With a primary, votes and delegates are decided on that day brush May 2016 #76

I have no problem with eliminating caucuses passiveporcupine May 2016 #77

Nobody is stopping you from voting redstateblues May 2016 #128

... Surya Gayatri May 2016 #3

Rec'd FlatBaroque May 2016 #4

Not sure what the point of the pic is, but I adore that movie. SusanCalvin May 2016 #31

what movie is this? passiveporcupine May 2016 #72

It is revenge of the nerds GummyBearz May 2016 #93

Yes we did...we all looked like super nerds. passiveporcupine May 2016 #95

typical bigtree May 2016 #5

There's one nice thing about you senz May 2016 #17

Mmmm farleftlib May 2016 #118

Accurate summary. Thank you. rec. PufPuf23 May 2016 #6

No, they don't really want the liberals to leave, Beowulf May 2016 #61

You just know that the Clinton camp has been studying the Rove playbook very carefully. Arugula Latte May 2016 #7

Dubya calls Bill his "brother from another mother" and Hill his "sister-in-law." senz May 2016 #15

Ick. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #28

I imagine Karl has been turning the pages for them reddread May 2016 #124

I'm witnessing something, but I guess I wouldn't call it that. Brickbat May 2016 #8

The word you mean isn't "progressive" it's IDEOLOGUE. KittyWampus May 2016 #9

Oh, please. Let us not start with the "purity" nonsense again. n/t arendt May 2016 #13

Wait a minute... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #23

Oh go back to bed. pangaia May 2016 #53

Yes, any clearheaded person would have realized this nomination race was over 6 weeks ago. stevenleser May 2016 #140

Sleaze by the numbers. Jester Messiah May 2016 #10

yes, threatening children is sleazy. Doxxing is sleazy. Mob behavior is sleazy. KittyWampus May 2016 #11

So is firing guns at and robbing campaign HQs. Jester Messiah May 2016 #12

What road? The road where you post random cr*p that happens to justify what happened in Nevada KittyWampus May 2016 #47

He wants to go there - So are name actors punching Sanders supporters. n/t arendt May 2016 #14

Yes... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #24

An interesting observation... arendt May 2016 #16

I hadn't heard about this. passiveporcupine May 2016 #70

Thank you for an extremely insightful OP. senz May 2016 #18

We haven't been able to legislate against Limpballs or Beck... arendt May 2016 #62

I've been thinking something similar. dgauss May 2016 #19

Hm. There was a man who whispered something in her ear before senz May 2016 #22

You betcha its plausible... arendt May 2016 #29

Not sure at all about what the gunshots were about dgauss May 2016 #30

It's a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty hootinholler May 2016 #20

Holy shit, is that tin foil? Darb May 2016 #21

Why are neocons so bad at "connecting the dots". arendt May 2016 #25

Just name one of the dots Saddam or Vladimir. JackRiddler May 2016 #67

LOL n/t arendt May 2016 #69

Incredibly vapid point. Darb May 2016 #117

I wish I had stock in ALCOA. nt msanthrope May 2016 #182

Interesting theory. SusanCalvin May 2016 #27

I like FDR's take on it... arendt May 2016 #34

I never heard that one before. Like it, will use in future. SusanCalvin May 2016 #36

I do believe that's the fictional character Auric Goldfinger JackRiddler May 2016 #46

I stand corrected. A google search turns up Ian Fleming, and not FDR. n/t arendt May 2016 #52

I think it's been done before, arendt... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #32

This thread is going great... arendt May 2016 #37

That is interesting FlatBaroque May 2016 #163

Excellent OP! PowerToThePeople May 2016 #33

What does the downward green arrow icon mean? New to me. n/t arendt May 2016 #38

I found it on the interwebs PowerToThePeople May 2016 #40

OK. "I won't vote for HRC". But you were not helpful. n.t arendt May 2016 #44

Well PowerToThePeople May 2016 #80

I'm interested. Please, how can you get in more trouble than posting the icon... arendt May 2016 #83

? PowerToThePeople May 2016 #84

Sorry to hear that. I understand caution. n/t arendt May 2016 #86

You need a name, shorthand to keep calling them out. arendt May 2016 #39

K&R amborin May 2016 #35

You aren't wrong. Kick. nt silvershadow May 2016 #41

If the whole world is conspiring against you, do they have grounds? procon May 2016 #42

Provoke, passive aggressively deny, lather, rinse, repeat. n/t arendt May 2016 #45

Then what defines acceptible? procon May 2016 #50

We know you pro(conservatives), We know you. BillZBubb May 2016 #54

You know lots of labels and conspiracies, grant you that and a lolly, too. nt procon May 2016 #63

People who speak verifiable and meaningful facts... arendt May 2016 #58

Hey, procon, got time to respond to #58, or is mindlessly bashing people more fun? arendt May 2016 #64

Stop being a bully. procon May 2016 #97

Pathetic deflection and insult. n/t arendt May 2016 #113

Need a tissue? procon May 2016 #115

Is rigid ideological purity better? procon May 2016 #96

It is a canard to claim anyone who opposes HRC is a "purist" arendt May 2016 #108

And pinning simplistic tags on everything doesn't advance your position. procon May 2016 #125

Neutral arbitrar here DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #156

I think you're attacking some kind of straw man there. dgauss May 2016 #65

Party nomenklatura and corporate media hacks are the "whole world"? JackRiddler May 2016 #49

The approved list seems quite expansive and grows larger every day. procon May 2016 #56

It is referred to as "the establishment". You might have heard of it. n/t arendt May 2016 #66

What if I told you it was done with mirrors arikara May 2016 #89

Bernie, if you don't like the Democratic Party why did you get in it? nt Jitter65 May 2016 #48

This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #87

Well Stated cantbeserious May 2016 #55

Good post - here's a poem for you. JackRiddler May 2016 #68

K&R Thanks for posting this. nt JEB May 2016 #71

I prefer the name Virtual assasination nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #74

Interesting, but I want to emphasize the statistical angle. arendt May 2016 #81

Yeah, my preference comes from a novel nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #85

Bruce Sterling combines both our ideas arendt May 2016 #90

Just got it, for after the primaries nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #91

You might enjoy an interview I recently came across... drokhole May 2016 #162

There weren't any chairs thrown, but DNClinton isn't going to let facts get in the way of a smearjob HooptieWagon May 2016 #78

DWS interview arikara May 2016 #92

I have been thinking exactly the same thing and am happy to Land of Enchantment May 2016 #134

Its not like it hasn't happened in the past arikara May 2016 #185

thanks arendt. Very perceptive analysis. total ratfuckery. bbgrunt May 2016 #82

Outstanding analysis! Uncle Joe May 2016 #88

They will try to do to Bernie supporters what they did to OWS. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #94

Great post. Dare I add that "Bernie Bros" was the progeny of "Obama boys" and merrily May 2016 #98

Dead on... davidlynch May 2016 #99

Excellent post, thank you! Scuba May 2016 #100

a la Howard Dean Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #101

Sounds like an excellent read of the situation, arendt. VulgarPoet May 2016 #102

K&R Spot On! B Calm May 2016 #103

Well I'll say this.... Adrahil May 2016 #104

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #106

Great response. JoePhilly May 2016 #119

Absolutely and I'm ashamed of the party right now. Sad. MaeScott May 2016 #105

Stories that unite vs. Stories that divide drokhole May 2016 #109

Excellent post, Drokhole. nt 2cannan May 2016 #151

modern variation of the Reichstag fire to accomplish a political goal... islandmkl May 2016 #111

Yep. The media is their weapon of choice. senz May 2016 #177

K&R lagomorph777 May 2016 #112

Are we really using the word "retard" now, without any comment? auntpurl May 2016 #114

it wasn't used derogatorily, but you know that, dontchya, "Auntie"? TheSarcastinator May 2016 #129

"It wasn't used derogatorily" auntpurl May 2016 #130

BWAHAHAHA TheSarcastinator May 2016 #142

for your own good...don't ever attempt to tune a car engine... islandmkl May 2016 #179

uuughhhh .......... polly7 May 2016 #131

It was wrong when he did it auntpurl May 2016 #132

LOL: your "concern" is duly noted TheSarcastinator May 2016 #141

Except that the OP didn't use the term in any other context but to highlight what Rahm called polly7 May 2016 #145

"Sanders is responsible for the IWR"? reddread May 2016 #148

Oohhhh ........... polly7 May 2016 #149

bet it bites like hell reddread May 2016 #150

LOL. Maybe, dunno really. It's a possiblility. (My sister needs to get rid of some). nt. polly7 May 2016 #152

so much trouble in such a compact package reddread May 2016 #157

Hey, you could train him and be a rodeo pick-up man/woman! polly7 May 2016 #158

im sure it would fit neatly in the back of my 53 Ford panel truck reddread May 2016 #159

That sounds great. But he'll probably eat newspaper, better get some straw and a shovel. nt. polly7 May 2016 #160

Concern Trolling TheSarcastinator May 2016 #143

Rahm used it. It wasn't the OP's choice of words. n/t cui bono May 2016 #167

I keep seeing that word "stochastic" appear ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #133

David Brock has Made the Democratic Establishment Comfortable with Limbaugh-style Smears TheSarcastinator May 2016 #135

Oh come on Demsrule86 May 2016 #136

The Left recognizes that we are getting close to the tipping point if we haven't already gone rhett o rick May 2016 #138

MATH ... Optimism May 2016 #146

Clinton/Trump 43-39 and falling, Sanders/Trump 51-39 and holding MisterP May 2016 #170

If you don't like the Democratic Party, why not affiliate with a different party or start your own? MoonRiver May 2016 #147

Or maybe chnage it like Bill Clinton did? He made it a centerist party when he accepted the DLC way, cui bono May 2016 #168

Exactly right. KPN May 2016 #154

Kick and Recommend. nt. polly7 May 2016 #155

Agree completely except to add that they're also "lathering up" the right wing of the Dem Party cui bono May 2016 #165

Well said - K&R Ferd Berfel May 2016 #169

arendt! nashville_brook May 2016 #172

Kicked and recommended to the Max! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #178

I do not agree to your post also please edit sdaz May 2016 #180

it's a reference to when Rahm Emanuel called the left "fucking retards" MisterP May 2016 #181

Great work of fiction on the OP's part JCMach1 May 2016 #183

Why Is This No Longer Top of Greatest Threads? It has 185 Recs! n/t davidlynch May 2016 #184

Massive k&r. Thanks arendt. nt appal_jack May 2016 #186

Thanks! Good piece... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #187