2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I was wrong. I'm sorry. .... [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)came down to a gesture, but then realized "this shit is actually serious." Her post is full of no issues, just character assassination. She didn't ever want to disrupt the status quo. She just wanted Bernie to pull Hillary to the left a little I guess, and then bow out gracefully. She's mad now that HE is hurting the party, not that the party is doing a damn fine job of dividing itself.
Whether she knows it or not, she's copying and pasting right from talking points. So if she's not selling, she's certainly buying, and that's pretty sad. I'm not impressed with her logic, or the depth of her analysis, and I'm not impressed with her Bernie credentials.
If your objective is to point out that there are capricious people who vote, well that's no surprise to me. There's a reason this line of attack has been so well orchestrated. If you wanted to show me to what extent hammering home the polls and the Hillary inevitability and these attacks are working on the capricious voter, then job well done.
If you posted this shit because you know it will help to erode more support by manufacturing a certain line of consent, well gross. Why else post a single person's opinion,when it says absolutely nothing new,adding no value to the discussion, really?