2016 Postmortem

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)

2. I know it's not entirely reliable...but she's not on the list...

Wed May 18, 2016, 01:46 PM

May 2016

...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2016 . Also, wouldn't you generally cite that endorsement? It's not linked to anything.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I wonder how many of her attackers realized Roberta Lange is a Bernie endorser? [View all] pnwmom May 2016 OP

I think it's obvious most Bernie supporters assumed she was in the tank for Hillary. LonePirate May 2016 #1

She's not a Bernie endorser nor does she support him. More lies. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #18

Do you have a source that contradicts the Newsweek report in the OP? LonePirate May 2016 #25

I don't need one. Her actions on Saturday are proof positive. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #29

Ah, so you're fact free here and relying on your gut? Thank you for conceding that point. LonePirate May 2016 #33

Facts are there for all to see. You know damn good and well ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #74

She became one... MrWendel May 2016 #101

Oh geez puffy socks May 2016 #52

LOL. fact free Sanders fan. riversedge May 2016 #53

When a person says she is one thing, and her behavior shows that she is the opposite, which Cal33 May 2016 #72

This is uncalled for Dem2 May 2016 #77

I guess solipsism can be considered lovemydog May 2016 #97

She's not listed on Bernie's site or the more neutral wiki page. aikoaiko May 2016 #36

Thanks for sharing those links. LonePirate May 2016 #41

I know it's not entirely reliable...but she's not on the list... TCJ70 May 2016 #2

She said last night Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #3

Of course she did. peace13 May 2016 #5

yeah, on the face sounds like perfect bullshit. NT JCanete May 2016 #9

I don't believe her for a second. merrily May 2016 #10

I'm sure you don't Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #12

I don't believe things that are contrary to common sense. I feel no obligation to answer insulting merrily May 2016 #13

The podium bird... its more credible to them uponit7771 May 2016 #50

Lol Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #57

SQUAWK! frylock May 2016 #64

She was trying to be fair because of the facts. Sanders people did not listen to reason, just made seabeyond May 2016 #68

Bullshit ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #19

She opens her mouth and words fall out. enlightenment May 2016 #39

Those pigs are really flapping those wings! kiva May 2016 #40

Please make this an OP. frylock May 2016 #65

I second that motion me b zola May 2016 #96

She has been listed as Uncommitted as late as April and Sanders has no endorsement from her JimDandy May 2016 #105

She is a professional liar. She "endorses" the candidate she sabotages. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #4

Or maybe, she upholds the rules regardless of who she supports? Tarc May 2016 #11

Surely there is a public record of what delegates each candidate sent to the convention. LonePirate May 2016 #14

Videos of delegates making motions to count the delegates and having those motions ignored. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #21

As it was, they ran 4 hours over their time and were kicked out by the hotel for running pnwmom May 2016 #24

She gave herself dictatorial powers, ignored delegates at the convention and refused to hard count w4rma May 2016 #26

The credentials committee, which was made up 50/50 of Bernie and Hillary supporters, pnwmom May 2016 #30

Don't lie. To do this crap is why they removed Christine Kramar from the committee. w4rma May 2016 #85

You are falsely accusing me of lying. She was replaced by another Sanders person. pnwmom May 2016 #86

Fine. You're repeating lies. Here is the story of the e-mails. w4rma May 2016 #88

Your story of the county level caucuses has nothing to do with what happened at the state caucuses, pnwmom May 2016 #94

And, boom, you change the subject. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #95

He's lost Wonkette, the Rude Pundit and a superdelegate in the last 36 hours Number23 May 2016 #93

That's not what I was seeking. LonePirate May 2016 #28

There is, the NVDems had a count at the door. apnu May 2016 #60

Yes, but was Lange attending as a delegate for one of the candidates? LonePirate May 2016 #61

If only she had actually upheld the convention's rules rather than violating them. Scootaloo May 2016 #54

She did uphold the rules Tarc May 2016 #59

k&r bigtree May 2016 #6

Maybe she's like about a dozen posters here who lied about being Bernie supporters. merrily May 2016 #7

Well, considering she has no problem not telling the truth I don't find that endorsement believable. Skwmom May 2016 #8

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #15

and fully half the credentials committee were Sanders supporters nt BainsBane May 2016 #16

Then why did Lange rule that the Bernie delegates couldn't run for State Central Committee. All in it together May 2016 #81

Are you seriously claiming no Sanders supporters are on the state central committee? BainsBane May 2016 #87

I listened to Sen. Nina Turner and Nevada Superdelegate Erin Bilbray who were at All in it together May 2016 #98

How could anyone run for State Central Committee LiberalFighter May 2016 #89

There were supposed to be positions voted on at the convention, there are other committees. All in it together May 2016 #99

As I stated Nevada rules state that election of SCC officers are elected in odd years. LiberalFighter May 2016 #106

They're completely unhinged alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #17

Uh oh. The whole conspiracy theory is falling apart. Guess they need a new one now. YouDig May 2016 #20

That certainly changes quite a bit KingFlorez May 2016 #22

Lots of people are 'on record' as being say, heterosexual because the truth does not serve Bluenorthwest May 2016 #23

. ucrdem May 2016 #27

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #34

You're seriously trying to make this about GAY PEOPLE? I can't believe you wrote that!!! MADem May 2016 #37

I cited an example of things people say that are bullshit that serves their agenda. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #49

No--you just rolled it out and stepped on it. MADem May 2016 #58

Aleutian Underwater Basket Weaver! mcar May 2016 #73

You are a gem. Number23 May 2016 #91

You are too! MADem May 2016 #92

Well that's really a nice conspiracy. So she was planning this ahead of time, and decided YouDig May 2016 #38

Where is thie proof of this alleged endorsement? I see no evidence of it offered, just Bluenorthwest May 2016 #51

I feel confident that Jon Ralston will back her up. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #78

Ummm, what? mcar May 2016 #71

Seriously? pmorlan1 May 2016 #31

Who was the man whispering instructions in her ear? grasswire May 2016 #32

Parliamentarian LiberalFighter May 2016 #90

No she isn't. Jeesh. This easy to check. Luminous Animal May 2016 #35

She was neutral at the beginning, but she ended up in the Bernie camp. nt pnwmom May 2016 #44

Yeah right. That is why her twitter feed only mentions O'Malley and Clinton. Luminous Animal May 2016 #46

Citation? Scootaloo May 2016 #55

When? /nt tonedevil May 2016 #79

The new talking points e-mail has been released! Fuddnik May 2016 #42

3rd times a charm. riversedge May 2016 #56

If Lange were actually a Bernie supporter... Triloon May 2016 #43

Since when does the loser get to dictate to the winner? nt pnwmom May 2016 #45

The "winner" hasnt won anything at all until Triloon May 2016 #62

If that is the ideal, then why does Bernie insist that "triangulation" is evil? Compromise pnwmom May 2016 #67

The definition of triangulation is not compromise. Luminous Animal May 2016 #69

When the winner wants the loser's support. Beowulf May 2016 #102

Because it doesn't matter who does it. Votes, including delegates' votes, *matter*. Nt JudyM May 2016 #47

And there were more Hillary delegates than Bernie delegates, so that affected the outcome. pnwmom May 2016 #48

Is there a link to her endorsing Sanders? frylock May 2016 #63

The Newsweek article states it. The link is in the OP. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #66

No, sorry. Is there any proof other than what is claimed in the article? frylock May 2016 #80

*crickets* kiva May 2016 #82

How bout that? mcar May 2016 #70

A Bernie supporting superdelegate-what are the odds. hobbit709 May 2016 #75

Nobody but bernie can be trusted. Everyone else is a corporate shill. The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #76

Where's a link to her own endorsement of Bernie? Arazi May 2016 #83

Only in the minds of the Camp Weathervane people. hobbit709 May 2016 #84

Bullshit article. eom Norrin Radd May 2016 #100

She's not endorsed anybody. If article says that, then article is wrong. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #103

I don't give a crap. She cheated, on video, large as life. AtomicKitten May 2016 #104