Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary called people on welfare "deadbeats" [View all]Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)7. Because welfare reform was an attack on working class people and I wanted to bold that out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They used that to sell "progressive liberalisation" of services to the deveoping countries
Baobab
May 2016
#8
The plaintive, wholly unverified cry of an anonymous internet poster with a dash of
cali
May 2016
#59
probably not they have no shame. They are implying you are employed by David Brock
rbrnmw
May 2016
#63
I know. Let's export thousands of jobs and import millions of foreign workers. That will help poor
Akicita
May 2016
#33
That was the OLD Democratic Party. In the new, corporate-owned Democratic Party...
Yurovsky
May 2016
#64
Is there any reason you didn't boldface "Poverty overall is down" and "child poverty has dropped"?
YouDig
May 2016
#3
Because welfare reform was an attack on working class people and I wanted to bold that out.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#7
Aha, the actual fact that poverty and child poverty dropped while employment went up is
YouDig
May 2016
#9
poverty goes up and down. Welfare reform was a structural change, permanent.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#10
Well when Clinton was cutting welfare didn't he care that if the economy collapsed then people
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#14
His policies greatly reduced poverty. He couldn't forsee that Bush would wreck the economy after
YouDig
May 2016
#21
"couldn't forsee"? - The economy always goes up and down in cycles every few years. That's basic.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#23
No, 10-years of decreasing and then 10 years increasing poverty is not predictable.
YouDig
May 2016
#36
PNTR was not passed until very late in the Clinton years. To be real it had a huge effect.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#40
because bernie supporters don't care about helping the poor evidently, only nitpicking words.
MariaThinks
May 2016
#30
I didn't say that you were a deadbeat, nor the mother in NC. I doubt Clinton would either.
maxsolomon
May 2016
#54
Because it's so much better to sell out your country for millions.
Waiting For Everyman
May 2016
#12
Whatever. If you want to dance around it and try to justify it, go ahead.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#37
You hate Reagan for "welfare queens" but jwirr can't similarly loathe Clinton for deadbeats?
riderinthestorm
May 2016
#68