Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Is Not Ahead By 3 Million Votes [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)25. Yeah, flat earthers deny the validity of inferential and descriptive statistics.
"Glad we got that cleared up."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Common sense would tell you King's analysis is nonsensical... it doesn't even pass the eye test.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#18
it is intense, total desperation as it implodes before our eyes, they are in total desperado mode
amborin
May 2016
#65
Did you even read the article? He offers no facts refuting that Bernie got ZERO votes in Washington
pdsimdars
May 2016
#72
Whatever you read was likely wrong. As a PCO, my precinct and all the others locally set records
floriduck
May 2016
#37
It was high compared to other caucuses, but caucus turnout is miserable in general.
LisaM
May 2016
#51
For what it's worth, I'd Ike to do away with caucuses too. I'd prefer vote by mail.
floriduck
May 2016
#62
I might agree with you if he had an actual plans to accomplish his promises.
eastwestdem
May 2016
#70
The census is based on mathematical assumptions. Your and his arguments are obscurantist.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#20
Yeah, flat earthers deny the validity of inferential and descriptive statistics.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#25
The Nobel Prize winner has a firmer understanding of economics than the Vermont independent.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#33
No but they do report how many voted. You can do guess work based on results.
hrmjustin
May 2016
#28
A caucus vote count does not go by the population, if so the primary states would go by their
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#53