2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Clinton’s Claim Of Having 3 Million More Votes Than Sanders Is A Total Lie [View all]Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)If I should analyze the level of education of an average Hillarybot who live in their own reality, they never seem to be able to come up with more than one liners, pretending to be Bill Hicks while actually saying nothing and is less funny when faced with some unpleasant truths.
A rigged system is a rigged system,. Unless you thinking that the Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 was clean elections, you would be outraged by the blatant contempt your side have for the democratic process.
But you are not. You wallow in Wall Street support, false accusations and pure rejection of a system that is destroying both parties from within.
If you think that Wall Street gives money to both sides do it from the goodness of their hearts, you are a deluded naive, and a typical representative for the Americana sucker who have voted against their own interests since Reagan committed treason in 1980 to win an election.
Seems that your candidate have adopted the tactics of the republicans. And some of you have your heads so far up the anus of DLC that you can't see it clearly...fogged and drugged up on the manure that the Establishment have served as roses the last 35 years.
I am surprised that alleged democrats and "progressives" adapt a language and rhetoric of republicans.
Well....Not really...Seeing who Hillary "pals around" with and who she takes money from, she is definitely not a friend of OWS, the working stiff or even minorities.
She has never said "I share the same values as peace loving pacifists who wants to get money out of politics and equality under the law".
I have noted her saying she is pro gun and loves church goers. How well would that sit with the people the same gun owning church goers want to discriminate by law?
How the hell can she share the values of both progressives and Bush donors at the same time?
Do I share the same foreign policy views as the Bushies? Because that is what Hilary does, and she claims to be progressive, running a clean campaign without Super PAC support. And neither have the party leadership rigged the system against Bernie. Al the discrepancies that has hurt Bernie voters in earlier primaries are just coincidences and should be dismissed..As easily as their votes can be dismissed.
One meme I particularly love from Hillary bots are "it doesn't matter how many people he gathers as long as they don't vote!" As if people who are willing to stand in line for hours just to listen to someone speak wouldn't bother going to the polls and actually vote.
Another meme is how CORPdems think that all primaries In a two party system, should be closed. And only "loyal" party members (like in NY where they had to register in OCTOBER to vote in the primary) should be allowed to vote or have their votes counted.
Discard the 100 000 votes purged in Brooklyn alone. Make it seem as Hilary owns the state of New York despite the fact that Bernie won the vast majority of the counties outside of a city I still love.
The only people full of crap are Hilary bots who throws temper tantrums over something that never happened rather than focus on their own affiliation with a system so steeped in corruption you must be blind and brainwashed not to see it.,
How many Hilary voters were railing against the Patriot Act and the scape goating after 9-11?
How many Hilary voters supported Chris Matthews attack on Bill Donahue as un-American for not supporting the invasion of Iraq in 2003?
Want to talk about rhetoric and purity tests?
I am sure you wil fail it and fall in line with moderate repubicans of the 90s. NOT the progressives and lefties that has been demonized by the media and power pimps since the 70s.
That's only an assumption by the way. Based on the litte you managed to scribbe down without help