Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary reneges on California debate [View all]joshcryer
(62,331 posts)91. I know, right? This is totally made up bullshit.
No where in that article does the Clinton camp say they won't be doing the debate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
219 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders has developed a swelled head: problem of which Brady Kids were victims
lewebley3
May 2016
#162
Melting down right into unprecedented power to write the party platform!
AgingAmerican
May 2016
#211
A waste of time if your goal is not to get out the Democratic message and drive excitement, no? tia
TheBlackAdder
May 2016
#159
I hope fox does a 1 hour town hall with just Bernie, I bet Hill would change her mind then
litlbilly
May 2016
#102
Exactly. No one that even knows how to spell clue let alone has one is surprised by this
Number23
May 2016
#184
If he does I hope he doesn't pick it up or he'll be accused of throwing it.
derpderpderp
May 2016
#78
Even the international media has pronounced Sanders a "vanquished opponent." Why waste time debating
Number23
May 2016
#185
Plus chicken to face the question of why she hasn't released the transcripts AS PROMISED.
JudyM
May 2016
#32
Bernie supporters aren't persuadable right now. When he officially suspends things will change.
timlot
May 2016
#36
He wont be suspending anything after we win CA by 45 or 50. The new regs are off the charts
litlbilly
May 2016
#104
Trump cancelled his last debate; so I guess neither of them will get elected?
brooklynite
May 2016
#19
Being serious here, how many different ways can he do the same speech?
Starry Messenger
May 2016
#25
If you're being serious, why not address her breaking another promise?
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2016
#40
So true. It's been the same stump speech and the same talking points for over a year now.
Native
May 2016
#124
Actually debating and not just REPEATING YOURSELF is a sign of intellect.
Starry Messenger
May 2016
#182
Good..Washington Times is right-wing anyway.. There's no need for her to debate Sanders..
asuhornets
May 2016
#27
Intellectually dishonest hyperbole...unless you think the Secret Service can't handle
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2016
#42
Fortunately he didn't beat a woman because she supported a different candidate as Wendell Pierce did
Matt_in_STL
May 2016
#108
Exactly. Faux would create a circus like debate like they did with the republican
still_one
May 2016
#120
Bernie and his supporters should not be rewarded for their bad behavior. 1st rule of common sense.
Jitter65
May 2016
#37
Smart. She doesn't have to face Bernie. She should be preparing to face Trump now.
Native
May 2016
#132
This is why people don't trust her. Keep this in mind when you vote for her, it's whatever is
Autumn
May 2016
#56
The moonie times didn't presume to tell me what I would be doing in the future.
Autumn
May 2016
#134
This was some cheap fox news ploy meant to bash Hillary. Oreilly was promoting
The_Casual_Observer
May 2016
#57
No one told her what her platform is this week so she would be as lost as Blow Dry Joe!
yourpaljoey
May 2016
#144
You're probably right. But it's impossible to know if she always intended or just caved.
hellofromreddit
May 2016
#97
Well, you see it on actual issues as well. Gay marriage, war, banks, etc. Same pattern--always late.
hellofromreddit
May 2016
#101
I really don't know why she'd do this debate. What would be the point? She's won and won big
Number23
May 2016
#186
I actually agree with this. Clinton should concede and take the Cali loss graciously.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#112
Did I miss something? Does he all of a sudden have super powers he didn't have in the previous
Native
May 2016
#137
Thank you for bringing up Nancy Reagan again. I was getting tired of hearing about the chair.
Native
May 2016
#139
No need for the winner Hillary to debate the second runner up. Time to focus on Trump.
riversedge
May 2016
#169
Trust is the issue, and you are making it really tough for anyone to trust you. Madam Secretary.
Android3.14
May 2016
#176
this is a power move, a show of force that the primary's over and it's time to get into GE mode
MisterP
May 2016
#177
Jerk move on Clinton's part but probably the right call from a campaign perspective
Recursion
May 2016
#191