Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

msongs

(73,422 posts)

1. every bernie "win" should also be investigate for fraud. after all they use the same machines and

Reply to Time for change (Original post)

Fri May 20, 2016, 02:32 PM

May 2016

are run by same kinds of supervisors. yet it is only fraud when hillary wins.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Strange Electronic “Glitches” in Jefferson and Pike Counties in KY Democratic Primary [View all] Time for change May 2016 OP

every bernie "win" should also be investigate for fraud. after all they use the same machines and msongs May 2016 #1

Great Time for change May 2016 #2

Absolutely agree. Every state where a Bernie surrogate is in charge of the election system should Kip Humphrey May 2016 #7

Absolutely Time for change May 2016 #10

I don't think any Bernie supporter would be against that. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #13

I am all for a transparent election process, all the way from the get go. Hiraeth May 2016 #21

Bring it on. Scootaloo May 2016 #27

I would love to see both counties pmorlan1 May 2016 #3

Yes, it's a combingation of so many things Time for change May 2016 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #4

NowSam. you sound like Judge Judy! Hiraeth May 2016 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #28

Exiting polling is only accurate for Rs, not for Ds for which they are just a pesky nuisance. AtomicKitten May 2016 #5

K & R AzDar May 2016 #6

"several redditors" bigtree May 2016 #8

They all saw the same thing Time for change May 2016 #9

I Did as Well, but on the NYT benny05 May 2016 #11

Verifiable totals need more than a few electrons on a thumb drive. Octafish May 2016 #12

Thank you Octafish Time for change May 2016 #15

Attempting to delegitimize every election one loses is a hallmark of fascism alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #14

I would say that election fraud and disinterest in monitoring elections Time for change May 2016 #17

If Sanders supporters scrutiny of elections was evenly distributed alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #25

Well well nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #26

I'm a Kentuckian and have 100% confidence that the count is accurate. There's no fraud here. DemocraticWing May 2016 #16

How do you have 100% confidence in it, and Time for change May 2016 #18

It's accurate in relation to the conditions on the ground. DemocraticWing May 2016 #20

I trust your intentions but I disagree with you Time for change May 2016 #23

Indeed. Everything about the Louisville area was good for Clinton. Zynx May 2016 #19

You have 100% confidence in election results that are neither transparent nor verifiable? stillwaiting May 2016 #35

+100 Time for change May 2016 #36

Well well nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author randome May 2016 #30

+1! Enthusiast May 2016 #31

With alternate sources of communication now available, Time for change May 2016 #37

Why the next frontier of control is the web nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #38

Kicked and recommended! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #32

Okay, I'll call you paranoid. randome May 2016 #33

Yeah, but the big ones always favor Hillory Time for change May 2016 #34

To be fair, there other posdible conclusions nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #40

You sound like PRI officials nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #39