Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary called people on welfare "deadbeats" [View all]riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)66. That's a pretty disgusting RW lie actually
Myth #2: Welfare Recipients Are Lazy
The idea that most people on welfare are able-bodied adults who are just too lazy to get a job and make an honest living is utterly false.
Most benefit programs require recipients to work in order to collect. Take Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), for example. Single parents receiving this grant must work at least 30 hours per week in order to be eligible, and two-parent families must work between 35 and 50 hours a week.
The fact is, blue-collar wages in America are simply not high enough to support workers in todays economy. The wages paid by many large employers are so low that their full-time employees are eligible for welfare.
You heard that right: People are working full-time to support their families, paying their fair share of taxes, but are so underpaid that they cant get by without relying on government assistance.
This is partly due to the disturbing fact that the federal minimum wage has not been increased in over five years (despite the incessantly rising cost of living in our country) and partly due to voracious corporate greed.
And furthermore, half of all food stamp recipients are children. More than 82% of all food stamp money goes to households that include children, elderly people, or people with disabilities.These are people who legally or physically cannot work and live at the mercy of the system.
So where are all of these able-bodied lazy adults who are luxuriating off of their benefits? They are a fabrication.
Most people on welfare are hardworking, taxpaying citizens, just like the rest of us. Or they are impoverished children, elders, or folks with disabilities.
But its a lot easier for welfare critics to take help away from people that they imagine are lazy and deceitful, so that false image lives on.
The idea that most people on welfare are able-bodied adults who are just too lazy to get a job and make an honest living is utterly false.
Most benefit programs require recipients to work in order to collect. Take Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), for example. Single parents receiving this grant must work at least 30 hours per week in order to be eligible, and two-parent families must work between 35 and 50 hours a week.
The fact is, blue-collar wages in America are simply not high enough to support workers in todays economy. The wages paid by many large employers are so low that their full-time employees are eligible for welfare.
You heard that right: People are working full-time to support their families, paying their fair share of taxes, but are so underpaid that they cant get by without relying on government assistance.
This is partly due to the disturbing fact that the federal minimum wage has not been increased in over five years (despite the incessantly rising cost of living in our country) and partly due to voracious corporate greed.
And furthermore, half of all food stamp recipients are children. More than 82% of all food stamp money goes to households that include children, elderly people, or people with disabilities.These are people who legally or physically cannot work and live at the mercy of the system.
So where are all of these able-bodied lazy adults who are luxuriating off of their benefits? They are a fabrication.
Most people on welfare are hardworking, taxpaying citizens, just like the rest of us. Or they are impoverished children, elders, or folks with disabilities.
But its a lot easier for welfare critics to take help away from people that they imagine are lazy and deceitful, so that false image lives on.
http://groundswell.org/7-lies-about-welfare-that-many-people-believe-are-fact/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They used that to sell "progressive liberalisation" of services to the deveoping countries
Baobab
May 2016
#8
The plaintive, wholly unverified cry of an anonymous internet poster with a dash of
cali
May 2016
#59
probably not they have no shame. They are implying you are employed by David Brock
rbrnmw
May 2016
#63
I know. Let's export thousands of jobs and import millions of foreign workers. That will help poor
Akicita
May 2016
#33
That was the OLD Democratic Party. In the new, corporate-owned Democratic Party...
Yurovsky
May 2016
#64
Is there any reason you didn't boldface "Poverty overall is down" and "child poverty has dropped"?
YouDig
May 2016
#3
Because welfare reform was an attack on working class people and I wanted to bold that out.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#7
Aha, the actual fact that poverty and child poverty dropped while employment went up is
YouDig
May 2016
#9
poverty goes up and down. Welfare reform was a structural change, permanent.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#10
Well when Clinton was cutting welfare didn't he care that if the economy collapsed then people
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#14
His policies greatly reduced poverty. He couldn't forsee that Bush would wreck the economy after
YouDig
May 2016
#21
"couldn't forsee"? - The economy always goes up and down in cycles every few years. That's basic.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#23
No, 10-years of decreasing and then 10 years increasing poverty is not predictable.
YouDig
May 2016
#36
PNTR was not passed until very late in the Clinton years. To be real it had a huge effect.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#40
because bernie supporters don't care about helping the poor evidently, only nitpicking words.
MariaThinks
May 2016
#30
I didn't say that you were a deadbeat, nor the mother in NC. I doubt Clinton would either.
maxsolomon
May 2016
#54
Because it's so much better to sell out your country for millions.
Waiting For Everyman
May 2016
#12
Whatever. If you want to dance around it and try to justify it, go ahead.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2016
#37
You hate Reagan for "welfare queens" but jwirr can't similarly loathe Clinton for deadbeats?
riderinthestorm
May 2016
#68