Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wouldn't it be nice to be able to predict the future with accuracy? uppityperson May 2016 #1
Keep telling yourself that. BillZBubb May 2016 #2
Sanders in not going to run third party Ash_F May 2016 #3
he might 6chars May 2016 #4
Yep. ucrdem May 2016 #8
Solid record of achievement. Thorough, complete issue development senz May 2016 #49
AGREED SUCH HUBRIS... The BEST Candidate of The THREE Would Be By A Large Margin Bernie Sanders CorporatistNation May 2016 #125
"Letting him on the stage"? Armstead May 2016 #77
No he won't. He's made that clear. morningfog May 2016 #13
Yes he has. ucrdem May 2016 #18
No it doesn't. He would have to start last month getting on ballots. morningfog May 2016 #20
Baseless, yes, but let's be clear: Sanders no longer presents a threat to Dems in November. ucrdem May 2016 #22
Same possibility as Hillary shaving her head and leaving the race to join the Hare Krishna, sure. Scootaloo May 2016 #27
LOL, now THAT might affect the outcome in November. nt ucrdem May 2016 #30
I so wish she would. Autumn May 2016 #51
I'm glad he won't. It's not in the long term interests of a big tent party to not try to unite. ancianita May 2016 #61
Bernie will never rush to join the Hare Krishna. Autumn May 2016 #68
Yeah, just what we need senz May 2016 #67
My friend, I bow to your delightful wisdom Autumn May 2016 #71
ty Autumn senz May 2016 #80
Tell Clinton the sixteenth largest voting bloc are Hare Krishna members Rattlesnake Chaser May 2016 #143
Yeah, four terms as mayor, then 25 years in the House and Senate. senz May 2016 #48
Yeah. And pigs might fly out of my butt. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #83
But he's always got that in his back pocket. ucrdem May 2016 #5
He rejected it from the get-go. senz May 2016 #73
It was never a bargaining chip! Silver_Witch May 2016 #130
Yes republican turnout has been ahead of Democrats Andy823 May 2016 #16
Correct. Fawke Em May 2016 #39
not really DLCWIdem May 2016 #113
And she'll ride to the coronation on her unicorn and give free Skittles to everyone AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #6
It wouldn't help, no, but at this point the Bernie rump is not going to be all that helpful anyway. ucrdem May 2016 #9
You FINALLY found a scenario where Clinton wins! arcane1 May 2016 #7
After California and NJ get through voting ucrdem May 2016 #11
Absolutely. If Clinton runs against Trump, she wins. If Clinton runs against Sanders and Trump, seabeyond May 2016 #10
There's no doubt that Trump is taking cues from Sanders. ucrdem May 2016 #15
You need votes to win. Scootaloo May 2016 #36
Over 80% of Sanders People will comfortably vote for Clinton. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #40
Wouldn't hurt for her to make the effort to make sure and cement that. Scootaloo May 2016 #43
You know what? Not my place. Not Clinton's place. It is not enough for her to reach out. seabeyond May 2016 #84
It's Clinton's job to convince people to vote for her. Scootaloo May 2016 #86
I disagree. I do not think Clinton has done all the stuff you allot her. I think by her policies seabeyond May 2016 #89
I've yet to see you or any of her supporters enumerate her policies. Scootaloo May 2016 #90
Clintons policies are not one liners, or two words, like free college, free healthcare. seabeyond May 2016 #91
And see, right there Scootaloo May 2016 #98
Really? Silver_Witch May 2016 #131
Some are going to listen. Most of the PUMA 2016 will not listen for any reason. seabeyond May 2016 #134
Sorry I am listening carefully! Silver_Witch May 2016 #135
If you look at all the things she has discussed, you would see a progressive agenda. If you do not seabeyond May 2016 #137
Thanks for the judgement .! Silver_Witch May 2016 #139
And, this is exactly why people are not going to bother. seabeyond May 2016 #140
Because you have. No defense of Hillary's War mongering! Silver_Witch May 2016 #142
If Sanders run 3rd Party he'll get my vote. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #12
Sanders isn't running 3rd party. Hillary wouldn't win if he did but he's NOT RUNNING AS A 3rd PARTY! Attorney in Texas May 2016 #14
Of course he's not. And of course he'd lose again if he did. But so would Trump. ucrdem May 2016 #17
It's all acedemic because he won't run third party. morningfog May 2016 #19
He doesn't take half Dems in a 3-party race. ucrdem May 2016 #21
It's not going to happen, but I would be interested in seeing three-way polling. morningfog May 2016 #23
You're right, it isn't going to happen. nt ucrdem May 2016 #25
New voters don't favor Dems when Clinton sits on top of the ticket. Not with Bernie still an option. Betty Karlson May 2016 #24
Hard to say but conservatively they split. If they were already R they'll stay R of course. nt ucrdem May 2016 #26
Nope. Sanders has cross-over appeal in that age bracket. Betty Karlson May 2016 #28
He's pitching to them but then would they have voted in November anyway? ucrdem May 2016 #31
Nope: if he is on the ticket, they will come out to vote. Betty Karlson May 2016 #87
Yes, they'd vote for Bernie, and he might even win Vermont. ucrdem May 2016 #92
"he might even win Vermont" - where did I hear that before? Betty Karlson May 2016 #103
72% of Sanders supporters are already indicating that they'll vote for Clinton in November. TwilightZone May 2016 #97
That's only his Democratic supporters. His independent supporters show detest Clinton Betty Karlson May 2016 #102
Here is a three-way map to play with: morningfog May 2016 #29
And the winner is . . . ucrdem May 2016 #62
I had a hard time even coming to conclusions in most states. morningfog May 2016 #69
I'm a Bernie supporter but I think that map is probably damn accurate. n/t davidlynch May 2016 #100
Thank you! ucrdem May 2016 #106
No way does he get Virginia not with the AA pop there DLCWIdem May 2016 #114
Funny ablamj May 2016 #111
fantasy island DLCWIdem May 2016 #115
Wow, delusional. Must be the Clinton meth. HooptieWagon May 2016 #133
A lot of Rs in my area do NOT like Trump and they hate Clinton. Go figure. At this point, Hiraeth May 2016 #32
Bernie would doubtless get a substantial turnout, maybe some electoral votes, ucrdem May 2016 #33
He won't. This is ludicrous conspiracy theory junk from hill fans cali May 2016 #34
Of course he won't. But the pitch isn't coming from us. nt ucrdem May 2016 #35
Hill fans aren't the ones suggesting he run third-party. Look around. TwilightZone May 2016 #46
Hey, did you say "bring it on?" So you WANT rateyes May 2016 #37
To clarify, I mean "bring it on if you insist." No, I'm not endorsing it. ucrdem May 2016 #38
did you take into account where he can't get on the ballot because of sore loser laws DLCWIdem May 2016 #116
No just filing deadlines which are through this summer with one in early September. ucrdem May 2016 #120
Of course you are endorsing it. Silver_Witch May 2016 #138
Cool. Then nobody should take issue if he does it. Joe the Revelator May 2016 #41
Translation: some Hill Folk fear a 3rd party run. senz May 2016 #42
I was worried about a Bernie run, but she soldiered on through. ucrdem May 2016 #45
Brockian dirty tricks and election theft is now "soldiering on through?" senz May 2016 #52
Another way of expressing it would be to say she's winning, ucrdem May 2016 #56
Oh I love it! Pity pity cry cry / chortle chortle brag brag. senz May 2016 #63
He won't. Also, Independents don't split or go Trump. CBS's poll shows Hillary up 51/33 with Is TwilightZone May 2016 #44
Yes, I agree completely. ucrdem May 2016 #47
It's not happening so you can stop with this devisive bullshit, trying to scare people. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #50
If it isn't happening there's nothing to be afraid of. And no, it isn't happening. nt ucrdem May 2016 #53
It's not happening, not "If it isn't..." No other reason to say that besides stirring the pot! TheBlackAdder May 2016 #66
Exact same words. ucrdem May 2016 #70
You know. Playing coy or ignorant doesn't work. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #75
It isn't going to happen. Can we agree on that at least? ucrdem May 2016 #82
If you don't think this will happen why did you write the OP? St Aug girl May 2016 #78
Because there might be some who would like it to. The point is that it wouldn't matter. nt ucrdem May 2016 #79
Even though the republicans are running a fascist know-nothing clown, he The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #54
Must be Clinton Meth. HooptieWagon May 2016 #55
You left out the most important factor - by November most Bernie-ites will have lost interest tonyt53 May 2016 #57
Sorry, but he's not going to run 3rd party. n/t PoliticAverse May 2016 #58
re: "It might be harder but she still wins." thesquanderer May 2016 #59
My concern is she "wins," but not with a majority of voters. I think it goes to Congress then and Hoyt May 2016 #60
I get a big win for Clinton on this electoral map: ucrdem May 2016 #65
I hope you are right. Hoyt May 2016 #72
I think Bill got less than 50% of voters in 92 ucrdem May 2016 #81
Yep, he did, but Perot was in the race. TwilightZone May 2016 #95
Huh, that's interesting. TwilightZone May 2016 #96
She doesn't need a majority. Popular vote doesn't elect the president. TwilightZone May 2016 #94
I think I see what you're getting at now. Here's what happens if she doesn't get 270 EVs: ucrdem May 2016 #108
And if aliens shaped like giant neck pillows invade Earth and kill us all, it wont matter. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #74
Sanders will not run third way nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #76
I doubt very highly that he will run third party. barrow-wight May 2016 #85
There is no scenario where Hillary becomes president. DesMoinesDem May 2016 #88
Here's one to consider: ucrdem May 2016 #93
you are outa yer mind. lol. wheres the sarcasm tag? BootinUp May 2016 #99
"...OK," said Patrick doubtfully. His head tilted a bit, and a crease formed between his eyebrows. PatrickforO May 2016 #101
Sanders and Trump are after the same voting block nt Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #104
That's it in a nutshell. ucrdem May 2016 #105
I agree. Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #107
Exactly. ucrdem May 2016 #109
Lol Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #110
Question why wouldn't she take Virginia she won it in the primary extensive AA pop? DLCWIdem May 2016 #117
You know that's a good point. Lets give her Virginia ucrdem May 2016 #119
She would win WA, ME and RI? SheenaR May 2016 #112
Fine, give all three to Bernie and she still wins with over 270: ucrdem May 2016 #118
Perhaps you missed where I said SheenaR May 2016 #124
Not enough time left to get on the ballot PDittie May 2016 #121
I disagree and don't lose sleep over what might be. He has no intention of doing that. Vinca May 2016 #122
There will be no third party.... yuiyoshida May 2016 #123
I'm so glad Bernie is smarter than that. n/t CanonRay May 2016 #126
What if Martians attack? And Hillary turns out to be a robot? TheFarseer May 2016 #127
More crazy hyperbole! Silver_Witch May 2016 #128
Are you trying to bum out BS supporters?... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #129
So you support Sanders running as a third party in the GE? HooptieWagon May 2016 #132
Looks like someone needs a basic understanding of the Electoral College shawn703 May 2016 #136
Look out, some could see this advocating for a 3rd party candidate. aikoaiko May 2016 #141
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Sanders runs 3rd party...»Reply #43