Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

DrDan

(20,411 posts)

6. Even without a hint one campaign questions the legitimacy

Reply to hobbit709 (Reply #3)

Sun May 22, 2016, 07:58 AM

May 2016

Simply based on who is winning and who is losing

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Delegate Whistleblower at NV State Convention: We Were Told [View all] Time for change May 2016 OP

Were the 58 Registered Democrats at the time of the convention? Renew Deal May 2016 #1

I don't understand your question Time for change May 2016 #16

This doesn't prove that the 58 were not decertified for a legitimate reason. Vattel May 2016 #2

If there is even a hint of impropriety, then the legitimacy of the action is in question. hobbit709 May 2016 #3

Even without a hint one campaign questions the legitimacy DrDan May 2016 #6

Watch Roberta Lange In Action... The Video Speaks Volumes... She Is As Corrupt As The Day Is Long! CorporatistNation May 2016 #13

Here IS The Chaos... Fomented By Corruption At The VERY TOP! Watch IT! CorporatistNation May 2016 #14

Exactly - she should give in to the temper tantrums DrDan May 2016 #18

They questioned the legitimacy because they knew they were registered Democrats Time for change May 2016 #21

If not a registered dem - then decert is appropriate DrDan May 2016 #23

Apparently you didn't understand my question Time for change May 2016 #27

From what I understand they where at one point. TimPlo May 2016 #35

True, and it should be investigated. But the OP seemed to suggest that Vattel May 2016 #11

It was illegitimate to tell the Hillary surrogates that they could purge anybody they want Time for change May 2016 #29

The Whistleblower says on the video that the Hillary delegates were told Time for change May 2016 #17

I agree that they shoud have been given a chance to contest the decertification. Vattel May 2016 #22

The burden of proof should be the other way around. Time for change May 2016 #24

You may be right. IDK Vattel May 2016 #25

kick kgnu_fan May 2016 #4

I don't want that cabal running the country. HooptieWagon May 2016 #5

+1! nt nc4bo May 2016 #8

We will never get a proper treatment of this by the msm. But no matter - they are irrelevant. reformist2 May 2016 #7

There has been a lawsuit filed on it Time for change May 2016 #15

Problem with law suites in these matters is Ferd Berfel May 2016 #20

I believe that it's been contested also Time for change May 2016 #26

That would be different Ferd Berfel May 2016 #28

File under sketchy campaign literature. ucrdem May 2016 #9

Kick. MaeScott May 2016 #10

BBox trolls Bernie supporters, Lange rewrites the rules like a dictator...hey look, a folding chair. Snarkoleptic May 2016 #12

K&R EndElectoral May 2016 #19

There is no excuse for NV to have happened felix_numinous May 2016 #30

I don't understand why so many Hillary supporters here not only tolerate this but Time for change May 2016 #31

It is one thing for a candidate to be compulsively lying felix_numinous May 2016 #32

Thank you, Felix Time for change May 2016 #33

Online disruptors felix_numinous May 2016 #34