2016 Postmortem

BootinUp

(51,349 posts)

51. oooookaaaaay.nt

Reply to grasswire (Reply #50)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:32 AM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is no way Hillary will be indicted. No. Way. [View all] cali May 2016 OP

if not indictments then leaks MisterP May 2016 #1

The FBI should not have extrajudicial powers... Agschmid May 2016 #2

Neither should the DoJ Ash_F May 2016 #3

What if Comey sees the evidence as requiring indictment.. grasswire May 2016 #30

Maybe but I doubt it. Ash_F May 2016 #35

pfffft... laws are for commoners! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #52

I am of that opinion, too. longship May 2016 #4

I agree, longship cali May 2016 #5

It won't. tazkcmo May 2016 #7

yup. ditto your post. nt m-lekktor May 2016 #34

If the FBI finds she violated her security agreement is she still the candidate? leveymg May 2016 #21

I really don't think they can just sweep this under the rug. If they let her go, that just means antigop May 2016 #23

I didn't say this would be entirely without penalty for her. leveymg May 2016 #24

interesting timing from Bloomberg... antigop May 2016 #26

The GOP will happily run against her, regardless, because the FBI won't exhonerate leveymg May 2016 #31

She may have to drop out for "health reasons" grasswire May 2016 #45

you know, there has been media coverage of the foundation and the pay to play.. grasswire May 2016 #32

yeah, grasswire, I know. nt antigop May 2016 #38

The House would approve impeachment if she is not indicted madville May 2016 #6

That could be true, also. longship May 2016 #8

The Senate is possible in 2016, the House not likely madville May 2016 #9

The House is lost to Dems till 2024 Txbluedog May 2016 #10

Yup. hellofromreddit May 2016 #11

I agree. But I would also add that I have yet to see Vattel May 2016 #12

I wouldn't say that because of who the FBI Director is at this moment merbex May 2016 #13

We'll see Depaysement May 2016 #14

I agree that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted regards the emails for same reasonsas you but PufPuf23 May 2016 #15

Well then no wonder she so comfortably does things that would land others in jail. senz May 2016 #16

I agree completely, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. 2banon May 2016 #17

The DiFi Statement pmorlan1 May 2016 #55

thanks. My mistake..I didn't see the date it was made 2banon May 2016 #59

No problem pmorlan1 May 2016 #62

I can see her going to jail. rozdeep May 2016 #18

She may be indicted-- it will come down to technical points of law andym May 2016 #19

I agree, sadly. nt m-lekktor May 2016 #20

Agreed but I wouldn't bet on Comey not recommending it riderinthestorm May 2016 #22

I think Lynch declining to indict will lead to several significant resignations at the FBI. Calista241 May 2016 #42

IMO Clinton's team will find their very own 'Scooter Libby' to take the fall should it come to that azurnoir May 2016 #25

Christ. Beausoir May 2016 #27

In theory I agree, but jeopardizing national security may be a bridge too far to let slide. AtomicKitten May 2016 #28

that's true grasswire May 2016 #33

Yes. I read that last week somewhere. 840high May 2016 #58

If someone would make a REAL G$#D&^&%$# case against her, I would call for the indictment BootinUp May 2016 #29

The legal case against her is ironclad. But the FBI is hemmed in on both sides politically, leveymg May 2016 #36

Yeah, sure thing. The only thing posters like you convince me of is how BootinUp May 2016 #37

As always, attack the person because the law and the facts are against you leveymg May 2016 #39

If you actually posted a fact based article from a respected BootinUp May 2016 #40

If I could find one that isn't just spin, I would gladly post it. leveymg May 2016 #41

The only thing we know for sure is indictments over mis-handling of classified material BootinUp May 2016 #44

If it wasn't "deliberate intent", it was Keystone Kop level incompetence. That's okay with some... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #46

Your opinion is noted. nt BootinUp May 2016 #49

Your excerpt has proved your assertion wrong. grasswire May 2016 #47

Really? Perhaps you should explain why you interpret it differently. BootinUp May 2016 #48

truth is truth. grasswire May 2016 #50

oooookaaaaay.nt BootinUp May 2016 #51

It must make your life much 840high May 2016 #60

More right wing nonsense from you kaleckim May 2016 #56

Krugman has limited his criticism of Bernie Sanders, but recently took issue with Sanders BootinUp May 2016 #57

Was no Nevada violence kaleckim May 2016 #61

Unfortunately for you and other believers, BootinUp May 2016 #63

Nope kaleckim May 2016 #64

I looked at your links BootinUp May 2016 #65

Why should I care? kaleckim May 2016 #66

Or...because she didn't so anything illegal brooklynite May 2016 #43

What? You don't agree that people with wealth and power cali May 2016 #69

I do believe you, cali. But there is nothing to stop Congress. LiberalAndProud May 2016 #53

"I would literally bet my life on it. " dchill May 2016 #54

Petraeus freaking intentionally mishandled classified data for a book. joshcryer May 2016 #67

You've got it backwards. Hillary did much worse berni_mccoy May 2016 #70

yep, agree oldandhappy May 2016 #68

I disagree, she will. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #71