Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

panader0

(25,816 posts)

6. Ack! a fracking supporter!

Reply to Gothmog (Reply #4)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:11 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Questions I'd like answered from Hillary Supporters.... [View all] ThinkCritically May 2016 OP

Great questions. A wonderful tribute to your username. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #1

Platform on Citizens United Gothmog May 2016 #2

I genuinely wish you luck getting substantive responses. It would be a pleasure to have real JudyM May 2016 #3

Here, here. LAS14 May 2016 #11

Fracking Gothmog May 2016 #4

Ack! a fracking supporter! panader0 May 2016 #6

A rare sighting, to be sure! Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #9

I'll drink to that! RufusTFirefly May 2016 #26

FBI investigation Gothmog May 2016 #5

She "chose" to ignore the rules. So it's not a "serious lapse in judgement". panader0 May 2016 #7

Waiting for a Clinton indictment? Don’t hold your breath Gothmog May 2016 #14

I disagree that no crimes were committed--we'll have to wait and see. panader0 May 2016 #16

Exactly. The fact that Obama's DoJ may not indict is not a demonstration that no crime has occurred. Attorney in Texas May 2016 #25

What? yallerdawg May 2016 #27

This spells doom in the 40 or so civil suits for Hillary's deliberate violation of the FOIA, but the Attorney in Texas May 2016 #24

"As a lawyer..." bvf May 2016 #8

No-but I may try for the rules committee at the DNC Gothmog May 2016 #13

Oooh...! bvf May 2016 #18

I am running to be a national delegate and I have been working with the Clinton campaign on issues Gothmog May 2016 #21

I've been fairly active since working Dennis Kucinich's bvf May 2016 #33

Your posts amuse me given the rather sad but silly nature of your posts Gothmog May 2016 #34

Who said anything about Philadelphia? bvf May 2016 #37

You'd better hurry before DWS is thrown out.... panader0 May 2016 #19

Texas gets 9 members to each of the Rules, Platform and Credentials permanent committees Gothmog May 2016 #20

Any statement about "mens rea" is ill informed. You don't have access to the FBI's investigation so Attorney in Texas May 2016 #23

Hillary Clinton is going to be exonerated on the email controversy. Gothmog May 2016 #31

You say that you abhor the non-legal analysis of the issue. You should know there's no "exoneration" Attorney in Texas May 2016 #32

Thank you for your thoughtful discussion. I however have to disagree (a little bit). ThinkCritically May 2016 #36

Happy to engage in civil discourse. LAS14 May 2016 #10

Thanks for numbering Buzz cook May 2016 #12

Hmmm Tarc May 2016 #15

ok arely staircase May 2016 #17

Well, you could learn something about Citizens United, for starters. TwilightZone May 2016 #22

I'll answer: CrowCityDem May 2016 #28

+ 1 JoePhilly May 2016 #29

On question 1, Sanders is talking about appointing judges to SC who would rule to overturn, the case Thinkingabout May 2016 #30

^^^Thank you for all your responses^^^ ThinkCritically May 2016 #35