2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Questions I'd like answered from Hillary Supporters.... [View all]CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)1. You can't confuse volume with intent. Overturning that ruling will not be done through yelling. If she says she supports overturning it, that should settle the issue.
2. Without knowing the assessment of the after-effects, I can't comment. The result is wholly dependent on whether there is something ready to replace him. Removal, by itself, is not necessarily bad.
3. She obviously isn't a big coal fan, or else coal country wouldn't have had such a violent distaste for her in WV. Fracking is necessary for the time being, while we work on growing sustainable alternatives. We do not have enough 'clean' energy at the moment to satisfy our needs. Fracking may be a better option than burning more coal, or sending money to the Middle East for oil.
4. It is not the same issue. Cruz' wife was actually a part of the Wall Street culture we deride. Hillary gave speeches, while Heidi took part in the banking activities we want to crack down on.
5. No, I am not worried. While her email choices were not the best, they followed precedent, and weren't illegal. There won't be an indictment.