Questions I'd like answered from Hillary Supporters....

[Attorney in Texas]

32. You say that you abhor the non-legal analysis of the issue. You should know there's no "exoneration"

There is "guilty" and "not guilty" but no blank for "innocent."

You quote the Washington Post: "Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules."

Do you know what "scant" means? It does not mean none; it means some.

Let's try this sentence: "Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found some evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules."

No so rosy, is it?

Let's agree that the Obama administration DoJ is unlikely to prosecute regardless of the FBI recommendation. We should also agree that there will be no "exoneration" (in fact, the State Department report is more like a plea deal than anything else -- it seems like they are basically falling on their sword in the FOIA litigation in the hope of giving Hillary a defense in the criminal investigation), but I won't hold my breath.