2016 Postmortem

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)

56. Delusional

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:18 PM

May 2016

Even establishment flunkie Chris Cillizza isn't this blind.

This is a bad day for Clinton's presidential campaign. Period. For a candidate already struggling to overcome a perception that she is neither honest nor trustworthy, the IG report makes that task significantly harder. No one will come out of this news cycle — with the exception of the hardest of the hard-core Clinton people — believing she is a better bet for the presidency on May 25 than she was on May 23.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/25/hillary-clintons-email-problems-just-got-much-worse/

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

5 TAKEAWAYS FROM THE STATE OIG REPORT (Clinton email scandal) [View all] BootinUp May 2016 OP

Are you supposed to post Brock's talking points here? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #1

Hmm, it's not very subtle. lagomorph777 May 2016 #10

Naked propaganda without so much as a fig leaf to cover its naked lies. cali May 2016 #11

Yes, these are striking distortions of the report. JudyM May 2016 #25

This is pathetic. joshcryer May 2016 #51

I tend to think SuperPAC-funded spin is pathetic and shameful. Obviously, we differ. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #76

Well, the other choice is right-wing sites Dem2 May 2016 #36

Its better than all the pro Trump garbage from Sanders supporters workinclasszero May 2016 #42

bigtree is a long time DUer. joshcryer May 2016 #49

bootinup Octafish May 2016 #54

Reading is fundamental Matt_in_STL May 2016 #55

And Correctrecord aka David Brock has spoken merbex May 2016 #2

Nice Spin! SpareribSP May 2016 #3

key points MariaThinks May 2016 #4

do these findings have weight? Are they official? MariaThinks May 2016 #5

There will be no indictment is the general consensus, read the OIG conclusion BootinUp May 2016 #8

I agree. There will be no indictment. It's different for the wealthy and powerful cali May 2016 #13

Basically, nothing will satifsy you, nothing, thats open minded of you. nt BootinUp May 2016 #15

not so. cali May 2016 #20

thanks MariaThinks May 2016 #29

A lot of her predecessors speaktruthtopower May 2016 #6

Well, I am disgusted that known propaganda... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #7

Yes indeed Dem2 May 2016 #37

An intelligent Democrat... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #41

I've seen him interviewed many many times Dem2 May 2016 #44

So you are fine Brock publicly calling a woman a slut.... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #71

Lol Dem2 May 2016 #72

How is what he admitted to doing... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #73

"So you are fine (with)..." Dem2 May 2016 #74

He has been quoted as calling Anita Hill Else You Are Mad May 2016 #75

Diversion. Dem2 May 2016 #77

Let me put it this way: Else You Are Mad May 2016 #78

I'm neither a fan nor a critic of him Dem2 May 2016 #79

What arguments he makes... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #80

I'm sorry, I found this segment and interview quite compelling Dem2 May 2016 #81

Wait, I never mentioned Trump Else You Are Mad May 2016 #87

Brock is the analyst Dem2 May 2016 #88

Brock is not an analyst... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #89

Haterz gonna hate Dem2 May 2016 #90

My cousin used to be a congressman.... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #91

I guarantee you'd think "hmmm" Dem2 May 2016 #92

Or, I was told Brock was a scum bag back in 2010... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #93

It's embarrassing to see you guys posting hill propaganda with a straight face. cali May 2016 #9

Kidding? BootinUp May 2016 #12

It's pure propaganda. cali May 2016 #14

What will you do when Hillary is President? MariaThinks May 2016 #30

same thing the rest of us Bernie supports will do, prepare for the next primary Amishman May 2016 #34

Party pooper. oasis May 2016 #16

It's poop alright. morningfog May 2016 #27

HA HA HA!! Well that is certainly finding that silver lining. She screwed up...purposely. jmg257 May 2016 #17

Ah brock, propaganda dismissed on principle nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18

Yes, but we're supposed to just gobble up the right-wing sources posted here Dem2 May 2016 #38

Like the report?you mean the State Dept nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #45

Boomboomchickaboomboom Dem2 May 2016 #48

Right, maybe about the weather nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #50

Ain't nothing gonna come of it Dem2 May 2016 #52

You are all sounding like REPUBLICANS defending Nixon. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #53

Godwin Dem2 May 2016 #66

Ok Republicans defeding Bush nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #68

Going off the report is fine, but judicial watch the site you chose as the host BootinUp May 2016 #58

What part of they are hosting are you mssing? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #61

the conclusion reads: floppyboo May 2016 #69

I am reading this and this is damning nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #70

I'm starting to feel sorry for you all. It's going to be a brutal awakening when the FBI releases riderinthestorm May 2016 #19

A lot of people have read the report, and the conclusions they draw BootinUp May 2016 #22

You write like you never read the IG report. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #95

And your outrage over broken email rules is similary impressive. nt BootinUp May 2016 #97

Two secret missions were blown. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #98

Haven't seen any reputable source say anything like that. What are you reading these days? nt BootinUp May 2016 #99

Obviously. with the blinders you are sporting, ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #100

Facts not in evidence, and not presented by you. lol. BootinUp May 2016 #102

I don't need this bullshit. IGNORE ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #104

And they won't be presented in evidence, either for the reason COLGATE4 May 2016 #107

Brock crock. mmonk May 2016 #21

Expectation obliteration. oasis May 2016 #67

More like Confirmation Bias. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #83

The scandal isn't her email. It's the fact that she didn't follow guidelines for preserving Autumn May 2016 #23

That really pissed the right people off. nt arely staircase May 2016 #24

BWHAHAHHAHAAHAHA!!! Thanks for the laugh. morningfog May 2016 #26

k & r LAS14 May 2016 #28

1 2 3 o'clock 4 o'clock Brock GreatGazoo May 2016 #31

LOL farleftlib May 2016 #39

wicked spin job in that article, Brock would be proud! Amishman May 2016 #32

Ok, Brock sending out talking points already. glowing May 2016 #33

LOL, that was funny. Of course she has been pillaried for months BootinUp May 2016 #35

The report confirms that there were multiple hacking attempts Amishman May 2016 #40

cough*Brockshit*cough frylock May 2016 #43

Brock Samson has spoken Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #46

Here's something that jumps out at me, from the New York Times: Warren DeMontague May 2016 #47

Delusional pmorlan1 May 2016 #56

Just started reading the damn report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57

I don't expect it to be pmorlan1 May 2016 #59

CNN is calling it a scathing report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #60

The State Department was well aware of Clinton using her home email system. She emailed over rladdi May 2016 #62

Bravo, that was a talking point that was used early nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #63

they were ORDERED TO DROP THE ISSUE ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #101

IOWs ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #64

One real takeaway: cliffordu May 2016 #65

Here are NINE takeaways from a more objective source... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #82

I suggest you try to get over it. nt BootinUp May 2016 #84

Mmmkay. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #85

5 key points from the report Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #86

too many real facts, ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #103

k&r bigtree May 2016 #94

5 interesting points! Lol WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #96

her judgement is so poor. This all could have been avoided if she had a shread of sense. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #105

Opinions vary I have found. Her judgement on the issues that matter BootinUp May 2016 #106