2016 Postmortem

thesquanderer

(12,933 posts)

55. Yes, she seemed to go through a lot of effort to make sure...

Reply to Amishman (Reply #42)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:18 PM

May 2016

...that the public would not see her yoga routines or wedding planning details.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

" Clinton and her top aides chose not to cooperate with the review." [View all] Autumn May 2016 OP

Welcome to the next 4 to 8 years of prevarication, deception and non-answers. n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #1

As SOS that was her department, if she won't corporate with the review Autumn May 2016 #3

Refusing to cooperate with her own former department.... Segami May 2016 #11

Yeah, that's what President Trump will be doing. lagomorph777 May 2016 #36

a queen is exempt from mingling with the plebes roguevalley May 2016 #46

Mind-boggling. Punkingal May 2016 #2

I am sure the Hillary supporters will be along with a very good reason any minute Matt_in_STL May 2016 #4

I cannot believe so many people seem not to grasp vintx May 2016 #5

Her arrogance is breathtaking. cali May 2016 #6

I find her arrogance to be nauseating. The republicans are going to hit her hard on this. Autumn May 2016 #7

Undoubtedly. cali May 2016 #21

Think the pukes will pounce on this for another round of hearings? Autumn May 2016 #28

I think they don't need to bother. cali May 2016 #32

Unfortunately this is just the opening act. The FBI's investigation of the Clinton foundation think May 2016 #26

... and undoubtedly will incorporate the State IG's finding. This removes her excuse that "this is JudyM May 2016 #35

Stunning. She is above the law, in her mind. JudyM May 2016 #13

Lewinsky and the witch hunt was where the party started defending anything so long as MisterP May 2016 #44

Less and less subtle manipulation of us over time. JudyM May 2016 #48

it ALLOWED for increasing crudeness MisterP May 2016 #49

Hmmm. Yeah, sounds about right. Now they want party unity again. JudyM May 2016 #50

It should be noted that while Hillary headed the State Dept. She refused to appoint an IG. NWCorona May 2016 #8

I wasn't aware of that. Autumn May 2016 #12

One of Kerry's first moves was to appoint an IG and the audit reports from NWCorona May 2016 #16

She's always had every single base covered ...... the perks of being a lawyer. nt. polly7 May 2016 #14

Wow. How can that be justified? That "tidbit" ought to be an OP as snagglepuss May 2016 #17

I did not know that either. But, it does not surprise me. Hillary loathes transparency. stillwaiting May 2016 #39

Did ANYONE really need a report to figure this out (that she did not comply with record policies)? Skwmom May 2016 #9

Nope but having something official from the Obama/Kerry State Dept NWCorona May 2016 #15

Here's where I'm at. She and her aids would not corporate with the review. I understand that Autumn May 2016 #19

Obviously she didn't listen to Bill. "work hard... and play by the rules..". Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #10

That text doesn't appear in the linked article: Dem2 May 2016 #18

"State Dept. watchdog: Clinton violated email rules": think May 2016 #20

Thanks Dem2 May 2016 #24

Interagency spitball. Big deal. nt BootinUp May 2016 #25

Yeah go with that. All the way through the GE Autumn May 2016 #29

Nothing to see here, folks. frylock May 2016 #38

You got it. bvf May 2016 #52

No, there is only one agency involved. jeff47 May 2016 #43

The key word there is "chose". It shows intent. panader0 May 2016 #22

exactly! amborin May 2016 #31

Why do you hate women? QC May 2016 #23

Baby, I'm a hater Autumn May 2016 #27

I believe it's "why are you AFRAID of a strong woman?!" MisterP May 2016 #51

True. I must have been QC May 2016 #54

and this is just from STate! amborin May 2016 #30

There was no Inspector General at State from 2009-2012 Octafish May 2016 #33

Seeing as how she wouldn't cooperate with a review of the department she headed Autumn May 2016 #34

'Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.' Octafish May 2016 #37

HOW can this not piss off EVERY Democratic voter that is not part of the financial elite stillwaiting May 2016 #40

Absolutely Integrity Is For Paupers Octafish May 2016 #41

"The meek shall inherit nothing." -Frank Zappa DookDook May 2016 #45

whatever was in those 'private' emails was more important than her official business Amishman May 2016 #42

Absolutely. Octafish May 2016 #53

Yes, she seemed to go through a lot of effort to make sure... thesquanderer May 2016 #55

Let's not go overboard on this. This is only one very small part of the whole thing pdsimdars May 2016 #47