2016 Postmortem

BootinUp

(51,049 posts)

58. Going off the report is fine, but judicial watch the site you chose as the host

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:20 PM

May 2016

is definitely right wing. They were created way back for the express purpose of attacking the Clintons. While you are looking at the report, don't forget to read the shocking CONCLUSION.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

5 TAKEAWAYS FROM THE STATE OIG REPORT (Clinton email scandal) [View all] BootinUp May 2016 OP

Are you supposed to post Brock's talking points here? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #1

Hmm, it's not very subtle. lagomorph777 May 2016 #10

Naked propaganda without so much as a fig leaf to cover its naked lies. cali May 2016 #11

Yes, these are striking distortions of the report. JudyM May 2016 #25

This is pathetic. joshcryer May 2016 #51

I tend to think SuperPAC-funded spin is pathetic and shameful. Obviously, we differ. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #76

Well, the other choice is right-wing sites Dem2 May 2016 #36

Its better than all the pro Trump garbage from Sanders supporters workinclasszero May 2016 #42

bigtree is a long time DUer. joshcryer May 2016 #49

bootinup Octafish May 2016 #54

Reading is fundamental Matt_in_STL May 2016 #55

And Correctrecord aka David Brock has spoken merbex May 2016 #2

Nice Spin! SpareribSP May 2016 #3

key points MariaThinks May 2016 #4

do these findings have weight? Are they official? MariaThinks May 2016 #5

There will be no indictment is the general consensus, read the OIG conclusion BootinUp May 2016 #8

I agree. There will be no indictment. It's different for the wealthy and powerful cali May 2016 #13

Basically, nothing will satifsy you, nothing, thats open minded of you. nt BootinUp May 2016 #15

not so. cali May 2016 #20

thanks MariaThinks May 2016 #29

A lot of her predecessors speaktruthtopower May 2016 #6

Well, I am disgusted that known propaganda... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #7

Yes indeed Dem2 May 2016 #37

An intelligent Democrat... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #41

I've seen him interviewed many many times Dem2 May 2016 #44

So you are fine Brock publicly calling a woman a slut.... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #71

Lol Dem2 May 2016 #72

How is what he admitted to doing... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #73

"So you are fine (with)..." Dem2 May 2016 #74

He has been quoted as calling Anita Hill Else You Are Mad May 2016 #75

Diversion. Dem2 May 2016 #77

Let me put it this way: Else You Are Mad May 2016 #78

I'm neither a fan nor a critic of him Dem2 May 2016 #79

What arguments he makes... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #80

I'm sorry, I found this segment and interview quite compelling Dem2 May 2016 #81

Wait, I never mentioned Trump Else You Are Mad May 2016 #87

Brock is the analyst Dem2 May 2016 #88

Brock is not an analyst... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #89

Haterz gonna hate Dem2 May 2016 #90

My cousin used to be a congressman.... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #91

I guarantee you'd think "hmmm" Dem2 May 2016 #92

Or, I was told Brock was a scum bag back in 2010... Else You Are Mad May 2016 #93

It's embarrassing to see you guys posting hill propaganda with a straight face. cali May 2016 #9

Kidding? BootinUp May 2016 #12

It's pure propaganda. cali May 2016 #14

What will you do when Hillary is President? MariaThinks May 2016 #30

same thing the rest of us Bernie supports will do, prepare for the next primary Amishman May 2016 #34

Party pooper. oasis May 2016 #16

It's poop alright. morningfog May 2016 #27

HA HA HA!! Well that is certainly finding that silver lining. She screwed up...purposely. jmg257 May 2016 #17

Ah brock, propaganda dismissed on principle nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18

Yes, but we're supposed to just gobble up the right-wing sources posted here Dem2 May 2016 #38

Like the report?you mean the State Dept nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #45

Boomboomchickaboomboom Dem2 May 2016 #48

Right, maybe about the weather nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #50

Ain't nothing gonna come of it Dem2 May 2016 #52

You are all sounding like REPUBLICANS defending Nixon. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #53

Godwin Dem2 May 2016 #66

Ok Republicans defeding Bush nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #68

Going off the report is fine, but judicial watch the site you chose as the host BootinUp May 2016 #58

What part of they are hosting are you mssing? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #61

the conclusion reads: floppyboo May 2016 #69

I am reading this and this is damning nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #70

I'm starting to feel sorry for you all. It's going to be a brutal awakening when the FBI releases riderinthestorm May 2016 #19

A lot of people have read the report, and the conclusions they draw BootinUp May 2016 #22

You write like you never read the IG report. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #95

And your outrage over broken email rules is similary impressive. nt BootinUp May 2016 #97

Two secret missions were blown. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #98

Haven't seen any reputable source say anything like that. What are you reading these days? nt BootinUp May 2016 #99

Obviously. with the blinders you are sporting, ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #100

Facts not in evidence, and not presented by you. lol. BootinUp May 2016 #102

I don't need this bullshit. IGNORE ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #104

And they won't be presented in evidence, either for the reason COLGATE4 May 2016 #107

Brock crock. mmonk May 2016 #21

Expectation obliteration. oasis May 2016 #67

More like Confirmation Bias. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #83

The scandal isn't her email. It's the fact that she didn't follow guidelines for preserving Autumn May 2016 #23

That really pissed the right people off. nt arely staircase May 2016 #24

BWHAHAHHAHAAHAHA!!! Thanks for the laugh. morningfog May 2016 #26

k & r LAS14 May 2016 #28

1 2 3 o'clock 4 o'clock Brock GreatGazoo May 2016 #31

LOL farleftlib May 2016 #39

wicked spin job in that article, Brock would be proud! Amishman May 2016 #32

Ok, Brock sending out talking points already. glowing May 2016 #33

LOL, that was funny. Of course she has been pillaried for months BootinUp May 2016 #35

The report confirms that there were multiple hacking attempts Amishman May 2016 #40

cough*Brockshit*cough frylock May 2016 #43

Brock Samson has spoken Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #46

Here's something that jumps out at me, from the New York Times: Warren DeMontague May 2016 #47

Delusional pmorlan1 May 2016 #56

Just started reading the damn report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57

I don't expect it to be pmorlan1 May 2016 #59

CNN is calling it a scathing report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #60

The State Department was well aware of Clinton using her home email system. She emailed over rladdi May 2016 #62

Bravo, that was a talking point that was used early nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #63

they were ORDERED TO DROP THE ISSUE ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #101

IOWs ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #64

One real takeaway: cliffordu May 2016 #65

Here are NINE takeaways from a more objective source... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #82

I suggest you try to get over it. nt BootinUp May 2016 #84

Mmmkay. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #85

5 key points from the report Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #86

too many real facts, ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #103

k&r bigtree May 2016 #94

5 interesting points! Lol WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #96

her judgement is so poor. This all could have been avoided if she had a shread of sense. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #105

Opinions vary I have found. Her judgement on the issues that matter BootinUp May 2016 #106