2016 Postmortem

840high

(17,196 posts)

78. I care and I don't get

Reply to fancypants75 (Reply #53)

Wed May 25, 2016, 11:22 PM

May 2016

erections nor am I a republican.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

132 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guccifer News (Warning: from FOX) [View all] IdaBriggs May 2016 OP

Anyone who didn't see this coming has their head in the sand. Fawke Em May 2016 #1

If he had breached her server and does have documents or copies to prove it, he wouldn't need a plea Jitter65 May 2016 #98

He says he has 2 gigs hidden somewhere. Fawke Em May 2016 #104

Hillary is toast... say hello to President Sanders! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #102

boom, there it is. grasswire May 2016 #2

And some people will only focus on the word fox NWCorona May 2016 #3

Obviously they have a bias, but if they uncover the truth.... Yurovsky May 2016 #12

Agreed NWCorona May 2016 #13

The problem with being presumed innocent stops at the jwirr May 2016 #21

Her foot dragging hasn't helped... Yurovsky May 2016 #70

As they should, and Wolf today went full on right wingnut... scscholar May 2016 #73

I go to Fox - they 840high May 2016 #77

Completely factual. No need to apologize about the news source leveymg May 2016 #4

Purportedly 2 gigs worth NWCorona May 2016 #8

The question now turns to what did Russian intel learn from her files before they threw a bone to leveymg May 2016 #17

Wow, can you imagine if this could be tied in any way to Benghazi? Republican erections incoming! fancypants75 May 2016 #53

This reporter got her hands on a classified cable from the Ambassador IdaBriggs May 2016 #59

OMG. AzDar May 2016 #90

I care and I don't get 840high May 2016 #78

I had heard that Hillary had his schedule in her emails. pdsimdars May 2016 #103

And this is exactly the type of sensitive information that isn't "classified" Fawke Em May 2016 #105

You might be right in what you say; I just wondering why you think that because Samantha May 2016 #75

I think its entirely plausible the Russians had her server hacked from Day One, and had a complete leveymg May 2016 #94

Thanks for sharing your perspective Samantha May 2016 #119

This message was self-deleted by its author Beausoir May 2016 #5

+! DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #9

Dispute the facts not the source. panader0 May 2016 #23

Didn't like the 840high May 2016 #79

Adieu fair Beausoir. We hardly knew ye! corkhead May 2016 #117

Berners sure like Fox! YouDig May 2016 #6

NYT: "HRC's Greatest Influence" on Military Issues, a Fox News Pundit Who Makes Money From War amborin May 2016 #63

Hill fans sure hate the truth Logical Jun 2016 #127

Drip, drip, drip. If this doesn't stop soon Hillary will lose the election ... spin May 2016 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #10

You know they will madokie May 2016 #16

I haven't ignored you yet. But, I don't do that sorta thing. leveymg May 2016 #18

I've missed some of your good posts when you replied to people IdaBriggs May 2016 #22

I want to see what people say so I don't use ignore. leveymg May 2016 #32

You really believe he's going to be the nominee, don't you? barrow-wight May 2016 #27

We know he has Bill's white house doodles bobbobbins01 May 2016 #11

"It's Fox, but this reporter is A-OK 'cause she says what I want to hear!" TwilightZone May 2016 #14

Actually, she keeps getting scoops and has won some serious awards. IdaBriggs May 2016 #19

Dan Abrams' outfit agrees with Fox's assessment: Fawke Em May 2016 #26

Dan Abrams got it wrong about HRC before he started to get it right. leveymg May 2016 #38

He seems to be getting it now if the most recent stories on his blog Fawke Em May 2016 #42

I'll go back and post it tomorrow. nt leveymg May 2016 #54

As recently as February, Abrams was arguing that 793 doesn't fit. He omits mention that other major leveymg May 2016 #100

Thanks for the info. Fawke Em May 2016 #114

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511889539 amborin May 2016 #65

Expand your universe beyond DU. 840high May 2016 #80

Isn't this saying that he did indeed hack into her computer? jwirr May 2016 #15

We don't have the details yet about which ones he is pleading guilty to, but IdaBriggs May 2016 #20

Thank you. jwirr May 2016 #24

If he lied about anything, e.g., hacking her server/2gb, his other testimony would be less credible. JudyM May 2016 #55

No. He "hacked" Blumenthal's AOL account. That's what this has all been about. Recursion May 2016 #62

If you have to qualify a news source that much, it just tells you right there what it's worth. barrow-wight May 2016 #25

You've been here two weeks and already have over 300 posts -- IdaBriggs May 2016 #31

Can you give us a few more caveats? barrow-wight May 2016 #37

Best that you do your own research. IdaBriggs May 2016 #44

That's no longer on Fox. barrow-wight May 2016 #51

Hillary likes Fox, according to the NYT: amborin May 2016 #67

Ida, Angel, stop feeding the trolls. There is NO POINT. And you should recognize them by now. pdsimdars May 2016 #107

Sigh. You are right. It just seems like if I give them a chance IdaBriggs May 2016 #108

Correct that Record! Break those Barriers! arcane1 May 2016 #64

Yep barrow-wight May 2016 #85

Attack the source. How Clintonian. 840high May 2016 #81

wow. barrow-wight May 2016 #83

the reason someone might do so much qualifying is to try to appease people like you pdsimdars May 2016 #106

Any excuse will do. barrow-wight May 2016 #116

Is it me or is this starting to accelerate? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #28

They said it would be done in May at one point. IdaBriggs May 2016 #33

I will be on Friday covering the Trump rally nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34

Hopefully before Memorial Day -- I have a $5 donation to DU IdaBriggs May 2016 #39

Funny indeed nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #41

We're not quite at end game yet. The IC report gets released next. leveymg May 2016 #52

That is a real worry, but not to true believers nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57

I keep telling you... antigop May 2016 #74

regarding pressure to "sign off on a deal"... antigop May 2016 #118

You're getting your news from Fox? Man, that is real desperation. nt kstewart33 May 2016 #29

I'm not the one under investigation by the FBI, so not really IdaBriggs May 2016 #35

Ida, stay away from Faux News. kstewart33 May 2016 #40

Actually that particular reporter nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #43

Then go with other sources that have some credibility. kstewart33 May 2016 #46

Alas like those two, she is the one getting scoop, scoop, after scoop nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #49

Fox doesn't scare me. She seems 840high May 2016 #82

She is, though putting together my timeline nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #84

That's assuming that her "scoops" are real. Lord Magus May 2016 #86

Very much so they are nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #89

NYT says HRC likes Fox: amborin May 2016 #72

Ouch, it's coming... Bob41213 May 2016 #30

The shoe is unlikely to drop before the convention if he only just began cooperating today. Ash_F May 2016 #36

He formally took the plea yesterday. Fawke Em May 2016 #47

Good point. Ash_F May 2016 #50

He has been talking to the Feds for YEARS Bob41213 May 2016 #56

In that case they may be getting ready to get a sworn affidavit Ash_F May 2016 #58

The Smoking Gun website has been following him for a while. IdaBriggs May 2016 #66

Any port in a storm apparently mythology May 2016 #45

The FBI and DOJ apparently find him credible. IdaBriggs May 2016 #48

Or rather, Fox News says the FBI and DOJ find him credible. Lord Magus May 2016 #87

That was apparently quoted from the plea agreement, so, yes, the FBI and DOJ Fawke Em May 2016 #115

This message was self-deleted by its author IdaBriggs May 2016 #68

The "hack" in both cases was guessing their AOL password Recursion May 2016 #60

Whether this Guccifer hacked Hillary or not Merryland May 2016 #61

He hacked Sidney's AOL account nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #69

What makes that a fact at all? Lord Magus May 2016 #88

But he did say he got into her server and it was easy. pdsimdars May 2016 #110

And he's lying, because he provides no evidence to support that claim. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #121

That doesn't mean he's lying. He did have Bill Clinton's droodles from his WH days. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #131

Many of the top intelligence officials past and present ASSUME she was hacked. pdsimdars May 2016 #109

Thanks Ida pmorlan1 May 2016 #71

Me too, Ida. And Fox has been getting some good facts out there. Places like MSNBC pdsimdars May 2016 #111

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #76

Every time I see you saying "thank you for the post" IdaBriggs May 2016 #92

... Uncle Joe May 2016 #93

he likely has a pre-deletion picture of what was on there Baobab May 2016 #91

You'd think the DNC would have vetted her before pushing her out to the front! B Calm May 2016 #95

I believe they vetted the checks from her awesome fundraisers. IdaBriggs May 2016 #96

The nail has been hit squarely on the head!!! pdsimdars May 2016 #112

Thanks for keeping us up to date on fringe right wing talking points. NCTraveler May 2016 #97

Is there no loyalty in fairy land these days? Now you've moved on to the Guccifer Fairy! randome May 2016 #99

The Guccifer Fairy is friends with the Indictment Fairy. If you didn't know that, IdaBriggs May 2016 #101

Drip, drip, drip vintx May 2016 #113

It already is ugly that people on the left are using Fox News smears to make a case. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #122

Kick. nt nc4bo May 2016 #120

Of course it's from Fox. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #123

Your Membership Began: Tue May 17, 2016, 01:30 AM IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #128

Good catch! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #132

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #124

K&R TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #125

Don't get all atwitter MFM008 Jun 2016 #126

Why do you automatically assume his testimony will be used on Hillary? IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #129

I dearly hope that try to make some loony hacker the centerpiece of the anti-Hillary brigade Tarc Jun 2016 #130