Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
58. Bernie and his supporters (in my experience) view the job of the president to use the
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:42 AM
May 2016

bully pulpit to advocate for the right policies, not just the achievable policies.

Part of the job of the president is to inspire the country toward greater morality in public policy.

Bernie is up to that part of the job as well as to the organizational part of the job. He proved that when he was mayor of Burlington. He has demonstrated his ability to work with Republicans and conservative Democrats always forwarding the highest ideals while in the House and Senate.

Read his book, and you will learn what his philosophy of government is. It is much better than that of the Clintons. He doesn't just say, "It Takes a Village." He says, "Let's Build a Village that Enables Us All to Achieve Our Best."

Bill Clinton moved into the White House in 1993. The next president will move into the White House in 2017. That will be 24 years from Bill Clinton's moving into the White House. Think of what 24 years has meant in history. 1940 -- WWII to 1964 -- the election of LBJ. In that time, there was the Korean War and Sputnik and the space age began.

Another 24 year period was between 1980 and 2004. The internet was born. That birth changed our world.

What have the last 24 years brought? Climate change and the effect of fossil fuels and global warming have disrupted a natural balance in our environment. We will have to seriously deal with that in the next four years or face many difficulties for which we are not prepared.

I view those who support Hillary's incremental approach to many of our problems as fearful and unrealistic. We are going to have to be much more honest about limitations and our social interdependence in the coming years. Bernie is willing to talk about how we can move into the future. Hillary is still talking about a world that no longer exists, a reality that is the past.

That's why I support Bernie. We need universal healthcare. We must move the world toward the peaceful resolution of border, religious, ethnic, racial and gender disputes and the appreciation of our differences. That will take patience and a more spiritual approach than Hillary demonstrates that she is capable of. She is an incrementalist, but a very impatient one. It's just her nature. Bernie talks of revolution but is by nature a very patient person.

I think Bernie is what we need now. He will probably be our next president somehow.

And Bernie is not part of the corruption. That is what draws many of his voters to him. Hillary on the other hand, is smack dab in the middle of all the corruption. Doesn't mean she is an evil person. I don't think that at all. It's just the fishbowl of corruption that she lives in. Her fundraising dinners that cost what to most Americans are astronomical funds, are proof of that. $2700 at $7.25 an hour is over 370 hours of work -- over 9 forty-hour weeks of work. At $27 per hour, it is 100 hours of work or over 2.5 forty-hour weeks of work. When she holds fundraisers and the donations are $2700 per guest or even table, she is not raising money from ordinary Americans. She is excluding a lot of working people from her table. The unions may back her, but the rank and file union members in most unions couldn't afford the crumbs from the tables at one of her fundraisers.

That's corruption. Because people who can afford to give $2700 to a candidate expect something in return, something that may not benefit the person earning $7.25 or even $27 per hour. And the fact that she continues to receive money from these very generous donors tells us that the people who can afford those kinds of donations feel confident that they are going to get from her what it is that they want in return for that money. That is corruption.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think everyone hopes that the party and the country will move to the left over time. Tal Vez May 2016 #1
You're out of time. jeff47 May 2016 #2
Yep. Incrementalism has no place in an emergency setting. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #3
Fortunately for you and your goals, Hillary will win in November. BzaDem May 2016 #4
Very doubtful she will address most of my goals, if any, in a meaningful way. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #6
She won't nominate justices who will strike down your goals for the next 30+ years. BzaDem May 2016 #10
We shall see, won't we? GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #12
Bill Clinton puffy socks May 2016 #28
How is your Green Party candidate polling? redstateblues May 2016 #38
I'm actually pretty sure she will nominate justices who strike down my goals for the next 30 years.. Chan790 May 2016 #23
That's exactly what Nader supporters said in 2000. They then changed their tune very quickly. BzaDem May 2016 #30
We'll see. Chan790 May 2016 #35
16 years later, and we've still not moved left enough. retrowire May 2016 #39
That's like saying "I've tried not burning my house down for 16 years, and we STILL haven't moved BzaDem May 2016 #46
You saying going to the left = burning down a house? nt retrowire May 2016 #56
I am extremely glad that FDR did not think that way. I was jwirr May 2016 #9
Some questions about FDR's presidency. BzaDem May 2016 #14
Whoah! randome May 2016 #15
None of that make a hills worth of difference because what I jwirr May 2016 #18
One thing that will actually cause us to lose the battle against corporations forever BzaDem May 2016 #21
How were minorities prevented from receiving Social Security? k8conant May 2016 #31
Because agriculture and domestic service were exempted Recursion May 2016 #55
FDR had democratic party control of the house and senate workinclasszero May 2016 #29
Democrats used to stand for the working people and were not JEB May 2016 #59
The forces that 'stop' Sanders Trajan May 2016 #26
exactly! Cobalt Violet May 2016 #42
I am a strong Bernie supporter, and I think he still can win the nomination JDPriestly May 2016 #52
No one would be happier than I if she could pass progressive policies. BzaDem May 2016 #54
Bernie and his supporters (in my experience) view the job of the president to use the JDPriestly May 2016 #58
A Revolution (TM) on the backs of Bernie and a handful of Berniecrat House candidates? brooklynite May 2016 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #48
a condemnation is not an indictment. MFM008 May 2016 #53
I agree but I think war with Russia and/or the complete evisceration of national sovereignty bjo59 May 2016 #33
Michigan is proof that your "best way" is a fail. Two terms of Snyder has done nothing to turn corkhead May 2016 #5
I think that you need to understand that Snyder is a Republican. Tal Vez May 2016 #8
I know he is a republican. you said, and I quote corkhead May 2016 #40
cornbread—It would take Donald Trump winning by +06 points. CobaltBlue May 2016 #47
Over time ----- After the TPP is signed? After climate change jwirr May 2016 #7
There is nothing wrong with your opposition to TPP. Tal Vez May 2016 #13
Well since I already support the Unions in my state against it. jwirr May 2016 #16
There is one Democrat in the race Trajan May 2016 #32
Hillary is a right wing politician. Any agreement between her and Ryan will move the country to Doctor_J May 2016 #17
I don't share your view. Tal Vez May 2016 #20
"Clinton is plenty progressive." Chan790 May 2016 #24
Lumping Hillary in with Ted Cruz et al is extreme hyperbole redstateblues May 2016 #44
Are your neighbors afraid of you? If not, don't project your own paranoia leveymg May 2016 #37
The best defense is a good offense, Lincoln learned that lesson and applied it Uncle Joe May 2016 #50
And any day now, OWS will conquer the world. randome May 2016 #11
REality sets in... anigbrowl May 2016 #19
This has been debunked. Repeatedly. Chan790 May 2016 #27
The tea party didn't take over the GOP by starting at the top Orangepeel May 2016 #22
We aren't the Tea Party Trajan May 2016 #34
hopefully you won't put foreigners in internment camps like FDR did redstateblues May 2016 #45
..... cliffordu May 2016 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #51
Good for them - we're not them dana_b May 2016 #43
man, the mask is really off bigtree May 2016 #25
In the long-run, the trend line favors us and goes against Clintonites. n/t Chan790 May 2016 #36
Democracy involves the people, not corporations. -none May 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Democratic Party's Ci...»Reply #58