Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Guccifer News (Warning: from FOX) [View all]pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)111. Me too, Ida. And Fox has been getting some good facts out there. Places like MSNBC
which are supposed to be left leaning, but aren't, haven't done any credible reporting on it. EXCEPT, Joe and Mika, ironically. They've also been doing a great job.
We're upside down.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If he had breached her server and does have documents or copies to prove it, he wouldn't need a plea
Jitter65
May 2016
#98
The question now turns to what did Russian intel learn from her files before they threw a bone to
leveymg
May 2016
#17
Wow, can you imagine if this could be tied in any way to Benghazi? Republican erections incoming!
fancypants75
May 2016
#53
And this is exactly the type of sensitive information that isn't "classified"
Fawke Em
May 2016
#105
You might be right in what you say; I just wondering why you think that because
Samantha
May 2016
#75
I think its entirely plausible the Russians had her server hacked from Day One, and had a complete
leveymg
May 2016
#94
NYT: "HRC's Greatest Influence" on Military Issues, a Fox News Pundit Who Makes Money From War
amborin
May 2016
#63
"It's Fox, but this reporter is A-OK 'cause she says what I want to hear!"
TwilightZone
May 2016
#14
As recently as February, Abrams was arguing that 793 doesn't fit. He omits mention that other major
leveymg
May 2016
#100
If he lied about anything, e.g., hacking her server/2gb, his other testimony would be less credible.
JudyM
May 2016
#55
No. He "hacked" Blumenthal's AOL account. That's what this has all been about.
Recursion
May 2016
#62
If you have to qualify a news source that much, it just tells you right there what it's worth.
barrow-wight
May 2016
#25
Ida, Angel, stop feeding the trolls. There is NO POINT. And you should recognize them by now.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#107
the reason someone might do so much qualifying is to try to appease people like you
pdsimdars
May 2016
#106
The shoe is unlikely to drop before the convention if he only just began cooperating today.
Ash_F
May 2016
#36
That doesn't mean he's lying. He did have Bill Clinton's droodles from his WH days.
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#131
Many of the top intelligence officials past and present ASSUME she was hacked.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#109
Me too, Ida. And Fox has been getting some good facts out there. Places like MSNBC
pdsimdars
May 2016
#111
Is there no loyalty in fairy land these days? Now you've moved on to the Guccifer Fairy!
randome
May 2016
#99
The Guccifer Fairy is friends with the Indictment Fairy. If you didn't know that,
IdaBriggs
May 2016
#101
It already is ugly that people on the left are using Fox News smears to make a case. -nt-
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#122