2016 Postmortem

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

66. Yes....I have no doubt you used Google for your legal analysis.

Reply to Fawke Em (Reply #58)

Fri May 27, 2016, 07:33 AM

May 2016

Some of us though, let law school and practice form our opinions. There's a cabal of us on this board.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guccifer's Plea Agreement. [View all] Fawke Em May 2016 OP

Nobody cares about that clown The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #1

I care Ned_Devine May 2016 #2

+1 840high May 2016 #27

Everyone does roguevalley May 2016 #41

Two here care. nt Duval May 2016 #31

I guess you proved that poster wrong. Fairgo May 2016 #60

The DOJ cares enough to give him a deal NWCorona May 2016 #4

The DOJ wants his data so we can verify a breech and its severity apnu May 2016 #17

Yup NWCorona May 2016 #18

Except for the DoJ cali May 2016 #5

Well, technically that is not true, 'cause I think the FBI does... ret5hd May 2016 #6

You're going to care once he takes the stand pinebox May 2016 #7

Oh brother. Some convicted slob jail bird is going to The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #14

Who said anything about Trump? Nice projection? Is it a Kodak? pinebox May 2016 #16

Your argument is sloppy Fairgo May 2016 #61

That was what Nixon said about Deep Throat. corkhead May 2016 #11

I do. Fawke Em May 2016 #12

Ya think they flew him in and made a deal with him for kicks? JudyM May 2016 #25

Right. If he was just going to plead guilty, they could have done than via satellite Fawke Em May 2016 #33

He said he has records 840high May 2016 #48

I think its a reality show Fairgo May 2016 #63

Could totally be. This entire crazy web is going to make a good read or movie one day... JudyM May 2016 #68

That "clown" might result in big trouble for Hillary. Vinca May 2016 #32

You might not, but the DOJ does nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #49

You're too casual. leveymg May 2016 #54

Apparently the DOJ and the FBI care. bjo59 May 2016 #59

Interesting. They may have already given him a polygraph as part of his credibility check for JudyM May 2016 #3

MSNBC reported yesterday he is on a 24/7 polygraph pinebox May 2016 #9

Whaaa? How bizarre is that. JudyM May 2016 #19

It's very strange pinebox May 2016 #22

I noticed the polygraphs too... Bob41213 May 2016 #10

Yes, but they're still not admissible in court. Fawke Em May 2016 #13

Thanks, that part I already knew Bob41213 May 2016 #15

They can save time to avoid tracking down false leads lagomorph777 May 2016 #28

They wouldn't cut him a plea deal without credible info. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #62

Ruh-roh Bob41213 May 2016 #8

Sure does. Lining him up for multiple court appearances. That's as damning against Hillary as JudyM May 2016 #20

Yup! NWCorona May 2016 #23

Maybe chain of control of docs he came up with vs Clinton Foundation or against the SOS-State Dept JudyM May 2016 #24

It was reported that he has or rather had 2 gigs worth of data as back up. NWCorona May 2016 #26

Question is: who will find it first: DOJ or Wikileaks? lagomorph777 May 2016 #29

Probably all of the above already have it besides wiki. NWCorona May 2016 #30

I read Putin has 21000 mails and is debating roguevalley May 2016 #42

Too early to conclude that he'll testify against Hillary. Jim Lane May 2016 #40

Only people it could be against are Sid Bluementhal or Hillary Bob41213 May 2016 #46

You're still thinking just of Clinton's emails Jim Lane May 2016 #47

You are right, it could be someone else. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #64

yes. on thursdays 'democracy now' it hopemountain May 2016 #55

Woo hoo! Catherine strikes again! IdaBriggs May 2016 #21

This part is also interesting Fawke Em May 2016 #34

You're getting all excited over standard boilerplate in these COLGATE4 May 2016 #38

Nice of you to chime in. Fawke Em May 2016 #50

That's in every federal plea deal. nt msanthrope May 2016 #45

Shit. cliffordu May 2016 #35

Federal Authorities are not Santa Claus catnhatnh May 2016 #36

Standard boilerplate. Doesn't mean anything special. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #37

It might be if Lazar lived down the street. Fawke Em May 2016 #51

It's the same language whether for Lazar or for the co-conspirator COLGATE4 May 2016 #67

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote May 2016 #39

That's in every federal plea deal. Boilerplate. nt msanthrope May 2016 #44

Show me another one, then... Fawke Em May 2016 #52

I've got to Google for you? You've now had at least two lawyers on this thread point out to msanthrope May 2016 #53

are you an attorney? nt hopemountain May 2016 #56

Guilty. nt msanthrope May 2016 #65

A. No. I have Google. I use it. Maybe you should. Fawke Em May 2016 #58

Yes....I have no doubt you used Google for your legal analysis. msanthrope May 2016 #66

I think you're right. I can't see any prosecutor hanging a case on this sort of witness leveymg May 2016 #57

That's not how it works. The stool-pigeon leads to the evidence, and you base the case lagomorph777 May 2016 #69

Yes, I said the govt would be wary of the bonfides and provenance of any leveymg May 2016 #70

Absolutely. lagomorph777 May 2016 #71

OUCH! Attorney in Texas May 2016 #72

That's interesting Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #73