Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary has been Branded: "...the ongoing FBI investigation..." [View all]IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)19. The Clintons are paying for Justin Cooper's legal bills.
He was formerly an aid to Bill, has no security clearance, and was the guy who worked at the Clinton's house.
From the Timeline http://thompsontimeline.com/Latest_Timeline_Entries#/editor/0
March 10, 2015: Clinton falsely claims that her private server had "no security breaches." During her United Nations press conference, Clinton says about her private email server at her Chappaqua, New York, house: "The system we used was set up for President Clinton's office. And it had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches." However, in May 2016, a State Department inspector general's report will detail hacking attempts on Clinton's emails housed in the server. In January 2011, Justin Cooper, who helped managed the server, wrote in an email that he shut down the server because he suspected "someone was trying to hack us..." Later that day, he wrote, "We were attacked again so I shut (the server) down for a few min [minutes]." And in May 2011, Clinton told her aides that someone was "hacking into her email." Additionally, The Associated Press will later comment that "it's unclear what protection her email system might have achieved from having the Secret Service guard the property. Digital security breaches tend to come from computer networks, not over a fence." (The Associated Press, 5/27/2016)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When The Ship Begins "Taking On H2O" It IS Every Man/Woman For His Or Her Self!
CorporatistNation
May 2016
#65
It's a brief review of dozens of articles. Check out Paul Thompson's timeline for links
leveymg
May 2016
#7
I think "Unindicted Co-conspirator" works just as well, and has a rich heritage of use>
leveymg
May 2016
#10
Along with the likely deathbed deposition of Tyler Drumheller, there is plenty to flip Sid.
leveymg
May 2016
#30
That's my guess... that in October she's named as an unindicted co-conspirator. nt
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#22
lol...like ongoing Benghazi investigation, whitewater investigation, Vince Foster investigation,
beachbum bob
May 2016
#11
Thank you, thank you, thank you, leveymg for all the contemporaneous research you did on Benghazi
hedda_foil
May 2016
#75
I saw a statement on Slate. The nice thing about the dirt they've tried to fling
IdaBriggs
May 2016
#17
I disagree, and he sued appropriately. His campaign caught the "broken firewall"
IdaBriggs
May 2016
#46
"your fucking party nominates". See that's the problem right there. I am a lifelong Dem...u r not
asuhornets
May 2016
#70
hillary will be the nominee--period. She may not be as pure as you want her to be,but
asuhornets
May 2016
#81
It's only going to get worse. I blame the DNC for pushing her out in an unfare advantage to
B Calm
May 2016
#38
No problem. Sir Donald, the gentleman, will not mention it in polite society.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2016
#72