2016 Postmortem

reddread

(6,896 posts)

12. "more harm than good"

Reply to DCBob (Reply #11)

Tue May 31, 2016, 07:40 AM

May 2016

unless you place a value on clean water.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Major environmental group makes first ever endorsement of Hillary Clinton [View all] Henhouse May 2016 OP

Wow at least 2 huges ones back to back (UAW was great as well) Amimnoch May 2016 #1

Wow! How they explain her fracking? peace13 May 2016 #2

Guess they haven't heard of this newfangled thing called 'fracking'. cui bono May 2016 #3

They understand that natural gas is cleaner than coal. Berners seem oblivious to that fact. YouDig May 2016 #19

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #20

Cleaner than coal. Look up the suffix "-er". YouDig May 2016 #21

The Sandroids were brought into the fold with all sorts of lofty promises, anotherproletariat May 2016 #27

mmkay... cui bono May 2016 #22

Wonderful! Thank you! Lucinda May 2016 #4

Nice.... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #5

Maybe they figure we can save energy by lighting our fracked water at night. Vinca May 2016 #6

Endorsements do not mean a lot, but this one is especially good. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #7

Excellent endorsement. To all those complaining about fracking auntpurl May 2016 #8

Yes, and +1000 for explaining the context Hortensis May 2016 #10

She says one thing and does another pinebox May 2016 #17

You are way off, sorry GRhodes May 2016 #28

Thank you for going into such detail. Excellent post! cui bono May 2016 #48

Clean water is a huge issue! peace13 May 2016 #29

The Colombia Free Trade legislation supports continued use of coal and PufPuf23 May 2016 #30

Note that Plan Colombia - part of neo-con plan for global dominance - PufPuf23 May 2016 #34

How does the increase in use of cheap Colombian coal in the USA and northern Europe relate PufPuf23 May 2016 #36

This is yet another false choice, just like the social vs. economic justice was a false choice cui bono May 2016 #44

Under the bus NRDC, you bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!! Darb May 2016 #9

Regarding fracking..the NRDC's position is nuanced and certainly not in-line with Bernie's ban it. DCBob May 2016 #11

"more harm than good" reddread May 2016 #12

"unless you place a value on clean water." DCBob May 2016 #13

there is no either or, they are the treasure of the commons reddread May 2016 #14

Apparently the NRDC can see it the way I, Hillary and others see it. DCBob May 2016 #15

apparently reddread May 2016 #16

Good post. auntpurl May 2016 #18

I wish people GRhodes May 2016 #31

That's nonsense. It doesn't do more harm than solar or wind. cui bono May 2016 #24

I am not "okay" with fracking.. DCBob May 2016 #33

The thing with fracking is that they have somehow gotten an okay from govt to have non-disclosure cui bono May 2016 #38

K & R! kstewart33 May 2016 #23

Based on history, I would expect Hillary Clinton to be a weak environmental POTUS. PufPuf23 May 2016 #25

Another cause against its cause. mmonk May 2016 #26

Fracking abroad, big oil donors to Clinton Foundation, supported off shore drilling and Keystone EndElectoral May 2016 #32

K & R LAS14 May 2016 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #37

A very clear and notable distinction Carolina May 2016 #43

I was wondering about that but it was too late to look it up before work. cui bono May 2016 #45

Awesome! workinclasszero May 2016 #39

The best way to protect natural resources is to frack the shit out of them QC May 2016 #40

K&R Carolina May 2016 #42

Dear Californians Carolina May 2016 #41

Schwartzenegger for President!!! cui bono May 2016 #46

LOL Carolina May 2016 #47

Under the bus you go, folks. Along with all the other fracking supporters. Environmentalists? Sure. mikehiggins May 2016 #49

interesting. Bill USA May 2016 #50