2016 Postmortem

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

15. Yes all of it. Include footnotes

Tue May 31, 2016, 02:26 PM

May 2016

At this point you are looking quite ignorant. The apendix... A few actually, will explain the possible legal peril as well. Don't worry, that is not their job. But do worry,it is the FBI's to recommend those. This is not a nothing burger.

Oh and a cog would be facing 35 to life

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Enough of this 'rules' vs. 'legal requirements'!!! [View all] floppyboo May 2016 OP

it's like how they said Honduras was a coup but not a MILITARY coup MisterP May 2016 #1

And Brazil and Venezuela aren't economic coups either floppyboo May 2016 #4

Here's the whole quote annavictorious May 2016 #52

Being "slow to manage effectively the legal requirments" is not breaking the law. YouDig May 2016 #2

What "red tape" rule are you referring to? Press Virginia May 2016 #3

That she should have kept paper copies instead of electronic copies of her emails. YouDig May 2016 #5

She could have used the SMART system. Saved them Press Virginia May 2016 #6

Tsk tsk. She still saved them, but yeah she broke some little rule. YouDig May 2016 #7

The rule is in place because of a law Press Virginia May 2016 #9

That is not a little rule nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #11

The goal of the rule is preserving documents, and the documents were preserved. YouDig May 2016 #14

Under legal jeopardy two years after nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18

Here's what's going to happen. The FBI will come back and say that she technically YouDig May 2016 #21

You realize there are folks doing hard time nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #22

No criminal intent. No classified material, except retroactively. There's nothing. YouDig May 2016 #23

Mens rea is not necessary in national Intel cases nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #24

Explained by a pro, huh? That sounds very credible to me. YouDig May 2016 #25

Yup a lawyer who specializes in these cases nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #29

So when the FBI doesn't recommend any charges, you can ask him to help you out with YouDig May 2016 #30

Frankly we will be surprised nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #33

Yes, a lot of Berners will be surprised. Happens a lot, Berners being surprised. YouDig May 2016 #34

Except that I am an American not a Berner nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #37

You can be both an American and a Berner. YouDig May 2016 #38

Sweet one for all you know I could be voting for her nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #40

Your vote is indeed your business. There we agree. YouDig May 2016 #41

Then you chose your party nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #42

You can have as much contempt for me as you want. That is your choice too. YouDig May 2016 #43

Two right wing conservative parties nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #44

No, just one. The Republicans. Yeah, the Dems are more right than their counterparts in Europe, YouDig May 2016 #45

Political science is not your strong point either I see... the DNC is now a RW party nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47

Pretty strong, I'd say actually. YouDig May 2016 #49

So you are a fan of hte one we all make fun off? If you are what you say, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #54

Better ask Bush II and Cheney about theirs too. tonyt53 May 2016 #26

In 2006 people were up in arms over that too nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #32

Wrote to Senator Leahy myself. Aerows May 2016 #48

and it took a lawsuit for her to comply with that "little rule" Press Virginia May 2016 #50

Hmm that is because she purposely avoided nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #8

Not purposely, she just didn't know. Didn't read all the minor technical red tape rules. YouDig May 2016 #10

That is not what the report says. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #12

All 100 pages? I've read enough excerpts and analyses from others who have. YouDig May 2016 #13

Yes all of it. Include footnotes nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #15

No thanks. Others who know what they are talking about already have. Plenty of other YouDig May 2016 #16

Continue to live in the bunker nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #17

It is minor or the FBI would have at least gone to the trouble of talking to her scscholar May 2016 #19

They intend to interview her nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #20

So you're saying she is not very smart? notadmblnd May 2016 #27

Not very tach-savvy. Also had more important things to do than red tape. YouDig May 2016 #28

Smart woman like her- can't figure it out? Or she just refuses to? notadmblnd May 2016 #35

This is not the ballpark you are looking for. Aerows May 2016 #46

here it does mean more procedural, civil things treestar May 2016 #31

Good explanation. COLGATE4 May 2016 #36

It's true Dem2 May 2016 #39

thanks floppyboo May 2016 #53

Zzzzzmog Hillary drove 47 in a 45 !!!!!! Lol@hds uponit7771 May 2016 #51