Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
10. First of all, look at the chart and you will see that what I am promoting in this post is no myth -
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 02:59 AM
Jun 2016

Democrats held majorities in Congress from 1933 -1995. The only two exceptions were 1947-1949 and 1953-1955 (by a little).

Guess which genius managed to turn this around? Bill Clinton, in his second term, when the count went to 204-230 in the wrong direction.

Since then we have been in the minority every time, except between 2007-2011, just before Barack Obama and for one term in we were still in the majority.

Clintonian triangulation and the strangulation of the New Deal policies and values that made for the middle class and better living conditions for everybody have been disastrous thus far, and will prove particularly disastrous in 2016 if the familiar playbook is used.

The majorities are absolutely no myth. The conditions for PoC and whether or not they shared equally in all the benefits? I feel sure you are right that they did not, but they did share, because they also are the recipients of Social Security and Medicare and other social benefits that are the direct offspring of FDR and the New Deal.

I would really like to hear your take on what great added value the Clintons have every brought to the lives of PoC. I'm not saying there aren't any, but I'd like to hear anyway. And then I'd like to get some perspective - how do these compare to dismantling the advantages of New Deal economics?

If I am reading this correctly Uponthegears May 2016 #1
No, he's saying Bill Clinton cited misleading statistics Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #12
Democratic Party did so much better with the policies of FDR, holding majorities in Congress for highprincipleswork May 2016 #2
Words don't describe the damage they have done to this country. Baobab May 2016 #3
Why do you insist on promoting the same myth ... over, and over, again ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #4
While what you say is true, it doesn't negate the fact that ALL people are doing worse after cui bono Jun 2016 #8
I assume PoC benefitted in the end from Social Security and Medicare and numerous other programs highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #9
No one is saying ending or diluting these programs; but, if you haven't heard of ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #14
There is talk about PoC being the most rational of all this year, and I hate to say it, but highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #15
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #17
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and generous answer. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #19
Discussed here... cui bono Jun 2016 #16
And you would be incorrect in your thought ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #18
I never saw it until you constantly used it to smear Bernie. But let's drop that. cui bono Jun 2016 #20
Yes ... Let's move to you making up stuff I didn't say, nor, have ever thought ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #22
You didn't address anything I said and now you are pretty much calling me a liar. cui bono Jun 2016 #23
Yes I did ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #24
I'm not an economic primacy advocate. I advocate for everything as I have just said in my posts cui bono Jun 2016 #31
We cannot have another NewDeal today, all of the things done are against international private law. Baobab Jun 2016 #25
Yeah, so much more that needs to be done now to fix this country. cui bono Jun 2016 #35
First of all, look at the chart and you will see that what I am promoting in this post is no myth - highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #10
"I plan to vote for Jill Stein" oberliner May 2016 #5
Seems like a Bernie or Bust chap! riversedge Jun 2016 #26
Taken out of context.... why don't you refer to the actual quote... Raster Jun 2016 #28
I was just saying the writer could've started with that oberliner Jun 2016 #29
Except that wasn't the point and it's not an OpEd it's an interview. cui bono Jun 2016 #32
Q: What happened? What did you ask? And were you satisfied with President Clinton’s responses, Josh? oberliner Jun 2016 #33
That's what you would like, but then he would not be answering the question. cui bono Jun 2016 #34
I'm just saying he could've led with that oberliner Jun 2016 #36
Again though, there's no reason to start that way. It shouldn't matter unless one wants to prejudge cui bono Jun 2016 #38
Just watching this now. AtomicKitten May 2016 #6
Can anyone post the video? AtomicKitten May 2016 #7
Under Clinton at least within the Federal government, Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Jitter65 Jun 2016 #11
here's the video AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #13
He is a Bernie or Bust mentality riversedge Jun 2016 #27
Which means what exactly? Is it that he found Bill's answers validate everything you've read here AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #30
K&R + some more history bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #21
He knows what's up. The bullshit rhetoric and tortured statistics the new Dems use vintx Jun 2016 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Exchange between Bill Cli...»Reply #10