Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
15. There is talk about PoC being the most rational of all this year, and I hate to say it, but
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:08 PM
Jun 2016

I find them absolutely the least rational. Why? Possibly because the first Black President is about to leave office. That has to be the occasion for a great deal of sadness, whether or not he has truly fulfilled anything like a Progressive term of office or one that served even PoC in a particularly admirable way. He has been historically the first Black President, and that is amazing. Objectively speaking, many of us feel he could have gotten far more if he, like the Clintons, was not under the sway of Republican-lite policies begun during the times of Clinton, policies that have lost us the House and Senate more often than not.

In the midst of this sadness, Blacks have decided to crap on an admittedly White presidential candidate who was arrested in service of civil rights, stood out as one of the few to endorse Jesse Jackson, and is a clear fighter for racial justice. They have lobbied against economic Progressivism, because they seem to think racial justice must be put first. Obviously a huge issue that must be addressed, but in dealing with an entire populace, how do you put this first, and is that the wisest course of action? In all this they have sided with the person who arguably was far less pro-active in dealing with groups like BLM than Bernie Sanders. Also to denigrate the traditions of the New Deal and FDR, in favor apparently of Clintonian economics, a soundly regressive and unsuccessful skewing of Democratic thought. This does not seem rational in any sense to me.

I don't see how you can take Social Security out of the hands of FDR.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fdr-signs-social-security-act

As for Medicare, I know FDR didn't establish it. In fact, he left it out. But the people who were behind it when it did pass were largely inspired by principles of the New Deal.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/medicare-made

I put the New Deal up, not because it was perfect, but because it was the foundation for Progressive majorities in Congress and for governmental policies that were most socially responsible for decades. I put this up in direct contrast to the economic foundations of the Clinton presidency and of New Dems ever since, which have been largely based on Ronald Reagan!!!! Not that they completely mimic them, but they vary them slightly or they compromise with them or they incorporate them as much as they feel necessary to win over the electorate that they posit is so far to the Right.

What a recipe for capitulation and lack of success, which brings us to where we are today.

Does it really make sense to you to see PoC defending policies that are largely reactionary policies based on ideas fomented by Ronald Reagan versus going with the tried and true New Deal principles put forward and defended ardently by Bernie Sanders?

That is apparently where you and I differ. I will go with the New Deal principles every time, implemented for all people, versus the corrupted policies and economics of the New Dems which hurt us all.

If I am reading this correctly Uponthegears May 2016 #1
No, he's saying Bill Clinton cited misleading statistics Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #12
Democratic Party did so much better with the policies of FDR, holding majorities in Congress for highprincipleswork May 2016 #2
Words don't describe the damage they have done to this country. Baobab May 2016 #3
Why do you insist on promoting the same myth ... over, and over, again ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #4
While what you say is true, it doesn't negate the fact that ALL people are doing worse after cui bono Jun 2016 #8
I assume PoC benefitted in the end from Social Security and Medicare and numerous other programs highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #9
No one is saying ending or diluting these programs; but, if you haven't heard of ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #14
There is talk about PoC being the most rational of all this year, and I hate to say it, but highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #15
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #17
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and generous answer. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #19
Discussed here... cui bono Jun 2016 #16
And you would be incorrect in your thought ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #18
I never saw it until you constantly used it to smear Bernie. But let's drop that. cui bono Jun 2016 #20
Yes ... Let's move to you making up stuff I didn't say, nor, have ever thought ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #22
You didn't address anything I said and now you are pretty much calling me a liar. cui bono Jun 2016 #23
Yes I did ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #24
I'm not an economic primacy advocate. I advocate for everything as I have just said in my posts cui bono Jun 2016 #31
We cannot have another NewDeal today, all of the things done are against international private law. Baobab Jun 2016 #25
Yeah, so much more that needs to be done now to fix this country. cui bono Jun 2016 #35
First of all, look at the chart and you will see that what I am promoting in this post is no myth - highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #10
"I plan to vote for Jill Stein" oberliner May 2016 #5
Seems like a Bernie or Bust chap! riversedge Jun 2016 #26
Taken out of context.... why don't you refer to the actual quote... Raster Jun 2016 #28
I was just saying the writer could've started with that oberliner Jun 2016 #29
Except that wasn't the point and it's not an OpEd it's an interview. cui bono Jun 2016 #32
Q: What happened? What did you ask? And were you satisfied with President Clinton’s responses, Josh? oberliner Jun 2016 #33
That's what you would like, but then he would not be answering the question. cui bono Jun 2016 #34
I'm just saying he could've led with that oberliner Jun 2016 #36
Again though, there's no reason to start that way. It shouldn't matter unless one wants to prejudge cui bono Jun 2016 #38
Just watching this now. AtomicKitten May 2016 #6
Can anyone post the video? AtomicKitten May 2016 #7
Under Clinton at least within the Federal government, Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Jitter65 Jun 2016 #11
here's the video AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #13
He is a Bernie or Bust mentality riversedge Jun 2016 #27
Which means what exactly? Is it that he found Bill's answers validate everything you've read here AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #30
K&R + some more history bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #21
He knows what's up. The bullshit rhetoric and tortured statistics the new Dems use vintx Jun 2016 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Exchange between Bill Cli...»Reply #15