Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
12. I'm sure they'll have the whole range of opinions on cannabis law reform, too.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jun 2016

You know, everyone from those who favor stricter prison sentences outright to the ones who just want to arrest more pot smokers and then force them into treatment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absurd rationale. Unless you have a strongly corporate agenda and don't want labor interfering. nt stillwaiting Jun 2016 #1
Seriously, wuh tuh fuh? Maybe there's a decent explanation for this, but geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
Labor has no place in the "New Democratic Party", founded on principles first proposed by Bill highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #3
^ This! This is AL From's democratic party. The democratic party is a center right party, but most JRLeft Jun 2016 #6
That's why I find that chart illuminating. Better results when not "Center-Right". By far. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #8
Not since 1947-49 have we had so few Democrats (188) in Congress. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #11
That unfortunately is the place where some will find their reasons. Lord knows the DNC and the highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #15
I agree with you on that 100%. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #24
Most of Hillary's supporters have no idea what neoliberalism is. JRLeft Jun 2016 #19
This is alright according to her supporters. Money has no impact on democratic decision making. JRLeft Jun 2016 #4
Any pay day loan companies on the committee? scscholar Jun 2016 #5
Bernie had five slots, nominated six people. #BernieMath CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #7
That's not the case at all, but I'm sure you didn't read the article Matt_in_STL Jun 2016 #9
Considering the support that Bernie has won among Democratst, 5 slots is too few. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #17
Hillary got 6, he got 5. Perfectly fair. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #22
Who is Paul Booth then? BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #13
I guess they made an exception to the rule Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #20
I'm sure they'll have the whole range of opinions on cannabis law reform, too. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #12
Sounds like a recipe for achieving absolutely nothing. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #18
They're holding platform advisory meetings in "all four" regions of the US Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #21
They'd conflict with all the lobbyists the DNC has allowed to infiltrate the committee. AtomicKitten Jun 2016 #14
Oh, I understand the "rationale" perfectly. bvar22 Jun 2016 #16
Would have had to push out DWS payday loan choice AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #23
Labor had no representation in TPP negotiations... HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #25
Aside from a select few, the Party elites are wholly bought and paid for by big business. Broward Jun 2016 #26
WHAT the fuck! WHAT the FUCK Party IS this?! John Poet Jun 2016 #27
K & R LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DNC wouldn't allow labor ...»Reply #12