Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
129. Why do you automatically assume his testimony will be used on Hillary?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jun 2016

We know he hacked Blumenthal, and we know Blumenthal had information he wasn't supposed to have (because he was sending it to Hillary).



Interesting that you also automatically assume Hillary is the target, and then hope "intent" will save her from her any harm caused by her actions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Anyone who didn't see this coming has their head in the sand. Fawke Em May 2016 #1
If he had breached her server and does have documents or copies to prove it, he wouldn't need a plea Jitter65 May 2016 #98
He says he has 2 gigs hidden somewhere. Fawke Em May 2016 #104
Hillary is toast... say hello to President Sanders! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2016 #102
boom, there it is. grasswire May 2016 #2
And some people will only focus on the word fox NWCorona May 2016 #3
Obviously they have a bias, but if they uncover the truth.... Yurovsky May 2016 #12
Agreed NWCorona May 2016 #13
The problem with being presumed innocent stops at the jwirr May 2016 #21
Her foot dragging hasn't helped... Yurovsky May 2016 #70
As they should, and Wolf today went full on right wingnut... scscholar May 2016 #73
I go to Fox - they 840high May 2016 #77
Completely factual. No need to apologize about the news source leveymg May 2016 #4
Purportedly 2 gigs worth NWCorona May 2016 #8
The question now turns to what did Russian intel learn from her files before they threw a bone to leveymg May 2016 #17
Wow, can you imagine if this could be tied in any way to Benghazi? Republican erections incoming! fancypants75 May 2016 #53
This reporter got her hands on a classified cable from the Ambassador IdaBriggs May 2016 #59
OMG. AzDar May 2016 #90
I care and I don't get 840high May 2016 #78
I had heard that Hillary had his schedule in her emails. pdsimdars May 2016 #103
And this is exactly the type of sensitive information that isn't "classified" Fawke Em May 2016 #105
You might be right in what you say; I just wondering why you think that because Samantha May 2016 #75
I think its entirely plausible the Russians had her server hacked from Day One, and had a complete leveymg May 2016 #94
Thanks for sharing your perspective Samantha May 2016 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author Beausoir May 2016 #5
+! DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #9
Dispute the facts not the source. panader0 May 2016 #23
Didn't like the 840high May 2016 #79
Adieu fair Beausoir. We hardly knew ye! corkhead May 2016 #117
Berners sure like Fox! YouDig May 2016 #6
NYT: "HRC's Greatest Influence" on Military Issues, a Fox News Pundit Who Makes Money From War amborin May 2016 #63
Hill fans sure hate the truth Logical Jun 2016 #127
Drip, drip, drip. If this doesn't stop soon Hillary will lose the election ... spin May 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #10
You know they will madokie May 2016 #16
I haven't ignored you yet. But, I don't do that sorta thing. leveymg May 2016 #18
I've missed some of your good posts when you replied to people IdaBriggs May 2016 #22
I want to see what people say so I don't use ignore. leveymg May 2016 #32
You really believe he's going to be the nominee, don't you? barrow-wight May 2016 #27
We know he has Bill's white house doodles bobbobbins01 May 2016 #11
"It's Fox, but this reporter is A-OK 'cause she says what I want to hear!" TwilightZone May 2016 #14
Actually, she keeps getting scoops and has won some serious awards. IdaBriggs May 2016 #19
Dan Abrams' outfit agrees with Fox's assessment: Fawke Em May 2016 #26
Dan Abrams got it wrong about HRC before he started to get it right. leveymg May 2016 #38
He seems to be getting it now if the most recent stories on his blog Fawke Em May 2016 #42
I'll go back and post it tomorrow. nt leveymg May 2016 #54
As recently as February, Abrams was arguing that 793 doesn't fit. He omits mention that other major leveymg May 2016 #100
Thanks for the info. Fawke Em May 2016 #114
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511889539 amborin May 2016 #65
Expand your universe beyond DU. 840high May 2016 #80
Isn't this saying that he did indeed hack into her computer? jwirr May 2016 #15
We don't have the details yet about which ones he is pleading guilty to, but IdaBriggs May 2016 #20
Thank you. jwirr May 2016 #24
If he lied about anything, e.g., hacking her server/2gb, his other testimony would be less credible. JudyM May 2016 #55
No. He "hacked" Blumenthal's AOL account. That's what this has all been about. Recursion May 2016 #62
If you have to qualify a news source that much, it just tells you right there what it's worth. barrow-wight May 2016 #25
You've been here two weeks and already have over 300 posts -- IdaBriggs May 2016 #31
Can you give us a few more caveats? barrow-wight May 2016 #37
Best that you do your own research. IdaBriggs May 2016 #44
That's no longer on Fox. barrow-wight May 2016 #51
Hillary likes Fox, according to the NYT: amborin May 2016 #67
Ida, Angel, stop feeding the trolls. There is NO POINT. And you should recognize them by now. pdsimdars May 2016 #107
Sigh. You are right. It just seems like if I give them a chance IdaBriggs May 2016 #108
Correct that Record! Break those Barriers! arcane1 May 2016 #64
Yep barrow-wight May 2016 #85
Attack the source. How Clintonian. 840high May 2016 #81
wow. barrow-wight May 2016 #83
the reason someone might do so much qualifying is to try to appease people like you pdsimdars May 2016 #106
Any excuse will do. barrow-wight May 2016 #116
Is it me or is this starting to accelerate? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #28
They said it would be done in May at one point. IdaBriggs May 2016 #33
I will be on Friday covering the Trump rally nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34
Hopefully before Memorial Day -- I have a $5 donation to DU IdaBriggs May 2016 #39
Funny indeed nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #41
We're not quite at end game yet. The IC report gets released next. leveymg May 2016 #52
That is a real worry, but not to true believers nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57
I keep telling you... antigop May 2016 #74
regarding pressure to "sign off on a deal"... antigop May 2016 #118
You're getting your news from Fox? Man, that is real desperation. nt kstewart33 May 2016 #29
I'm not the one under investigation by the FBI, so not really IdaBriggs May 2016 #35
Ida, stay away from Faux News. kstewart33 May 2016 #40
Actually that particular reporter nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #43
Then go with other sources that have some credibility. kstewart33 May 2016 #46
Alas like those two, she is the one getting scoop, scoop, after scoop nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #49
Fox doesn't scare me. She seems 840high May 2016 #82
She is, though putting together my timeline nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #84
That's assuming that her "scoops" are real. Lord Magus May 2016 #86
Very much so they are nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #89
NYT says HRC likes Fox: amborin May 2016 #72
Ouch, it's coming... Bob41213 May 2016 #30
The shoe is unlikely to drop before the convention if he only just began cooperating today. Ash_F May 2016 #36
He formally took the plea yesterday. Fawke Em May 2016 #47
Good point. Ash_F May 2016 #50
He has been talking to the Feds for YEARS Bob41213 May 2016 #56
In that case they may be getting ready to get a sworn affidavit Ash_F May 2016 #58
The Smoking Gun website has been following him for a while. IdaBriggs May 2016 #66
Any port in a storm apparently mythology May 2016 #45
The FBI and DOJ apparently find him credible. IdaBriggs May 2016 #48
Or rather, Fox News says the FBI and DOJ find him credible. Lord Magus May 2016 #87
That was apparently quoted from the plea agreement, so, yes, the FBI and DOJ Fawke Em May 2016 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author IdaBriggs May 2016 #68
The "hack" in both cases was guessing their AOL password Recursion May 2016 #60
Whether this Guccifer hacked Hillary or not Merryland May 2016 #61
He hacked Sidney's AOL account nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #69
What makes that a fact at all? Lord Magus May 2016 #88
But he did say he got into her server and it was easy. pdsimdars May 2016 #110
And he's lying, because he provides no evidence to support that claim. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #121
That doesn't mean he's lying. He did have Bill Clinton's droodles from his WH days. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #131
Many of the top intelligence officials past and present ASSUME she was hacked. pdsimdars May 2016 #109
Thanks Ida pmorlan1 May 2016 #71
Me too, Ida. And Fox has been getting some good facts out there. Places like MSNBC pdsimdars May 2016 #111
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #76
Every time I see you saying "thank you for the post" IdaBriggs May 2016 #92
... Uncle Joe May 2016 #93
he likely has a pre-deletion picture of what was on there Baobab May 2016 #91
You'd think the DNC would have vetted her before pushing her out to the front! B Calm May 2016 #95
I believe they vetted the checks from her awesome fundraisers. IdaBriggs May 2016 #96
The nail has been hit squarely on the head!!! pdsimdars May 2016 #112
Thanks for keeping us up to date on fringe right wing talking points. NCTraveler May 2016 #97
Is there no loyalty in fairy land these days? Now you've moved on to the Guccifer Fairy! randome May 2016 #99
The Guccifer Fairy is friends with the Indictment Fairy. If you didn't know that, IdaBriggs May 2016 #101
Drip, drip, drip vintx May 2016 #113
It already is ugly that people on the left are using Fox News smears to make a case. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #122
Kick. nt nc4bo May 2016 #120
Of course it's from Fox. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #123
Your Membership Began: Tue May 17, 2016, 01:30 AM IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #128
Good catch! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #132
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #124
K&R TheFarS1de Jun 2016 #125
Don't get all atwitter MFM008 Jun 2016 #126
Why do you automatically assume his testimony will be used on Hillary? IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #129
I dearly hope that try to make some loony hacker the centerpiece of the anti-Hillary brigade Tarc Jun 2016 #130
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Guccifer News (Warning: f...»Reply #129