2016 Postmortem

840high

(17,196 posts)

70. May I add - JW has

Reply to mmonk (Reply #38)

Thu Jun 2, 2016, 10:23 PM

Jun 2016

also gone after republicans.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The FBI case against Hillary is NOT a RW smear! [View all] pinebox Jun 2016 OP

The FBI has an open INVESTIGATION. It has NOT brought a case against her. hlthe2b Jun 2016 #1

Correct pinebox Jun 2016 #3

Also used to rule out parties. FYI, part II. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #5

So you should retract your baseless smear anigbrowl Jun 2016 #7

My baseless smear? pinebox Jun 2016 #9

The FBI doesn't bring cases against people anyway, so with that in mind what was said was clear JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #15

No, the poster stated that the FBI had a case against her... hlthe2b Jun 2016 #20

I know. Try again, and nope, what i said was perfectly correct. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #21

Only in "JonLeibowitz-eeze" apparently. hlthe2b Jun 2016 #22

You're splitting hairs pinebox Jun 2016 #43

The process of Building a case... a case brought against an individual explicitlly hlthe2b Jun 2016 #85

Yawn pinebox Jun 2016 #86

I don't think they want to. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #2

They are going through the motions on an investigation that will end in nothing. onehandle Jun 2016 #4

Exactly. This. Talking about splitting hairs. To suggest the FBI would have happened without the RW seabeyond Jun 2016 #14

They opened an investigation at the request of the Obama appointee Press Virginia Jun 2016 #51

Do you have a source where the FBI claimed this? TimPlo Jun 2016 #35

You have no way of knowing that. morningfog Jun 2016 #49

So the Republican congress is frog marching Obama's DOJ? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #53

There is no FBI case against Hillary anigbrowl Jun 2016 #6

Splitting hairs pinebox Jun 2016 #8

While I'm not in the indictment camp passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #10

It's getting stupid with how the FBI is apparently run by the GOP pinebox Jun 2016 #12

And they've spent all this time "going through the motions" Press Virginia Jun 2016 #52

Well technically you nor I don't know this TimPlo Jun 2016 #36

The fbi issues recommendation madokie Jun 2016 #48

I can't blame them. It's hard to keep track of a Clinton's legal problems. /nt Marr Jun 2016 #11

It is. pinebox Jun 2016 #13

What if she had used all that energy in the service of the country yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #27

You need to pray harder to the Indictment Fairy! It's not working so far!!! beaglelover Jun 2016 #16

Trying my best. NV Whino Jun 2016 #18

Me too! Herman4747 Jun 2016 #19

me 3 840high Jun 2016 #65

I'm atheist. frylock Jun 2016 #24

I wouldn't hold my breath dude if I were you! LOL!!!!!! beaglelover Jun 2016 #39

Enjoy it while you still can. frylock Jun 2016 #42

Dream on dude 840high Jun 2016 #66

I'll settle for the Truth Fairy. The other one is a tired meme. libdem4life Jun 2016 #28

Uh, more spin that a funny car's wheels in the bleach box pinebox Jun 2016 #44

View profile I've said on here I don't wish to see her indicted several times but I suppose you miss puffy socks Jun 2016 #77

Should our government be run by backroom deals in smoke filled rooms... Matt_R Jun 2016 #84

Investigation? What happened to the security review? The inquiry? winter is coming Jun 2016 #17

I read the transcript 840high Jun 2016 #67

If something negative is brought up, it's a RW smear SheenaR Jun 2016 #23

This is so dangerous for a supposedly mature democracy nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author felix_numinous Jun 2016 #25

there is no case against hillary period....an investigation is not a case beachbum bob Jun 2016 #26

Has she refused FOIA requests? libdem4life Jun 2016 #30

She was very clear that she made herself available: scscholar Jun 2016 #63

Wrong. First of all FOIA requests can be libdem4life Jun 2016 #88

Again, splitting hairs pinebox Jun 2016 #45

Is the FBI a smear outfit? 840high Jun 2016 #68

I agree; it isn't just a RW smear Tarc Jun 2016 #29

A double conspiracy theory...otherwise called a twofer. libdem4life Jun 2016 #33

It is a RW and Sanders camp smear. seabeyond Jun 2016 #34

et tu? You disappoint. 840high Jun 2016 #69

Tarc, please tell us how the FBI is a RW smear pinebox Jun 2016 #46

Didn't say it was, piney. Tarc Jun 2016 #50

Ah Tarc I'm sorry pinebox Jun 2016 #76

Perhaps in some of the nations whose leaders Sanders has praised... Tarc Jun 2016 #80

Cuba? pinebox Jun 2016 #81

Yes, it is. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #31

And what if it was a RW smear? She herself is so far to the right truedelphi Jun 2016 #37

And on the civil side, Judicial Watch goes first because they filed the first suit. mmonk Jun 2016 #38

May I add - JW has 840high Jun 2016 #70

and JW is on this only because CREW was literally taken over by Brock 2014 MisterP Jun 2016 #74

That does explain their absence. mmonk Jun 2016 #87

My May 12th post: panader0 Jun 2016 #40

Bullshit. joshcryer Jun 2016 #41

Ya it's bullshit alright pinebox Jun 2016 #47

"Routine security review" Press Virginia Jun 2016 #55

yep 840high Jun 2016 #71

It should not have come out. joshcryer Jun 2016 #62

Why should an IG request to the DOJ be a secret? Press Virginia Jun 2016 #78

I'll call your bullshit and raise you elephant shit. The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #54

What has leaked in this FBI investigation? Press Virginia Jun 2016 #58

That there IS an investigation. joshcryer Jun 2016 #60

Was it supposed to be a secret when the IG filed the request? Press Virginia Jun 2016 #61

Why should it be secret? It's 840high Jun 2016 #72

Keep trying to sell it, pinebox. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #56

Does the FBI know they can drop their investigation when DU transitions? Press Virginia Jun 2016 #57

No, they'll be disappointed. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #59

Sell what? pinebox Jun 2016 #79

Funny thing is almost all of her supporters are lockstep. Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #64

You are right. Posters 840high Jun 2016 #73

You are right. Poseurs. Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #75

"73 FOIA suits pending against the State Department" Babel_17 Jun 2016 #82

There has been a hugely successful veil of disinformation on this, I've been surprised Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #83