2016 Postmortem

SamKnause

(14,942 posts)

3. She did not give a foreign policy speech.

Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:55 AM

Jun 2016

She roasted Donald, and she roasted him well !!!

It is disingenuous to say her speech was about foreign policy.

That is my 2 cents.

P.S. Bernie has been calling Donald a pathological liar since December.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

133 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attacking Hillary's speech to Defend Trump is Disgusting [View all] bravenak Jun 2016 OP

I haven't seen that here. Have you? If so, please provide a link. cali Jun 2016 #1

You missed the ops attacking her speech? bravenak Jun 2016 #2

Copy a few and share. peace13 Jun 2016 #13

I already gave you one bravenak Jun 2016 #15

This OP is not an attack, it is pretty spot on. peace13 Jun 2016 #18

Trump has not even ruled out using nukes so no bravenak Jun 2016 #20

If you can take anything he says as serious...... peace13 Jun 2016 #23

Trump is their presumptive nominee until we hear different bravenak Jun 2016 #25

Everyone else has dropped out puffy socks Jun 2016 #101

Has Hilary ruled out nukes? and better yet can any POTUS decide to unilaterally nuke anyone? azurnoir Jun 2016 #109

Has Hillary ever threatened to use nukes or force just because her feelings get hurt? bravenak Jun 2016 #110

the central question is does any POTUS have the authority to unilaterally order a nuke attack? azurnoir Jun 2016 #121

Doesn't matter if he had the authority bravenak Jun 2016 #122

I'm not sure even a Republican Congress would vote for the use of nukes azurnoir Jun 2016 #123

I'm not sure they wouldn't bravenak Jun 2016 #124

She isn't more hawkish than Trump gollygee Jun 2016 #104

"funny that people support a candidate and then get angry...." Sancho Jun 2016 #132

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #87

Where did I mention Bernie Sanders or his supporters? bravenak Jun 2016 #91

That is rich, coming from your side. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #92

I just served on a jury for this reply. Total BS PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #125

Jury results coming...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #126

I was juror #3 PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #127

Good result...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #128

She did not give a foreign policy speech. SamKnause Jun 2016 #3

She arguably roasted him on his lack of FP and showed how little he knows bravenak Jun 2016 #4

He knows nothing but its not like her track record is stellar Press Virginia Jun 2016 #34

So I guess it's best to attack her for attacking him? Wft? bravenak Jun 2016 #36

How is pointing out her track record on foreign policy anything more Press Virginia Jun 2016 #37

It is pretty much helpjng Trump since her speech was against him bravenak Jun 2016 #38

Great! She criticized Trump. Press Virginia Jun 2016 #40

People could simply not attack her for blasting Trump bravenak Jun 2016 #41

True Press Virginia Jun 2016 #44

One success, in terms of her obvious goals, she mentioned: Ghost Dog Jun 2016 #79

Does that make you more or less likely to vote for Trump? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #54

Does what? He's a reality TV guy whose name is on a bunch of shit Press Virginia Jun 2016 #56

I guesss he should have focussed on the primary DrDan Jun 2016 #5

It was a foreign policy speech, it was about foreign policy under trump. Nt Logical Jun 2016 #52

I knew yesterday's vow wouldn't take. Vinca Jun 2016 #6

This has NADA to do with Sanders unless he also attacked her speech about Trump bravenak Jun 2016 #8

Yeah melman Jun 2016 #16

Lots of concern trolling from Sanders supporters StayFrosty Jun 2016 #7

I see folks calling it the worst speech ever, like, really? bravenak Jun 2016 #10

We don't need a speech of name calling angrychair Jun 2016 #81

NO ONE HERE IS DEFENDING TRUMP! peace13 Jun 2016 #9

Attacking her for giving a speech attacking Trump is defending Trump bravenak Jun 2016 #11

OK the title calls it horrible but the argument stands. peace13 Jun 2016 #17

They were not attacking her for attacking Trump. peace13 Jun 2016 #21

They used her speech as an opening to attack HER rather than go after Trump bravenak Jun 2016 #24

Going after Trump is like chasing a turd in the toilet bowl. peace13 Jun 2016 #33

Can I get a link to this info that Trump will not be the nominee? Seems suspect. bravenak Jun 2016 #35

If you did not love hillarys take down of trump you do not belong here! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #53

Fortunately for others, that is not your decision to make. peace13 Jun 2016 #58

Lol, soon i will! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #62

How DARE they criticize her highness. Off with their h.. oh wait, HRC's not corronated yet jack_krass Jun 2016 #12

What sense does it make to attack her for attacking Trump? bravenak Jun 2016 #14

Nobody is criticizing Hillary criticizing Trump jack_krass Jun 2016 #42

I saw them do it bravenak Jun 2016 #43

Dead. On. Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #19

Can't say it surprised me bravenak Jun 2016 #22

I agree, i honestly are embarassed by some of these bernie supporters nt Logical Jun 2016 #26

Pretty sure some of them are disruptors bravenak Jun 2016 #28

I am beginning to think they are too, i am not a hillary fan but also know.... Logical Jun 2016 #31

Massive K & R for the dose of reality... Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #27

I wish we could just have one anti Trump day here on du bravenak Jun 2016 #30

Yeah, how about declaring "Hate on Trump Day". No Sanders or Clinton threads allowed for 24 hours. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #95

you refer to posts that include this?... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #29

Yes. That is exactly what I mean bravenak Jun 2016 #32

no room for war hawks in DEM party HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #47

It's funny that she ignored Obama's directives as SOS... peace13 Jun 2016 #39

Well that didn't last long hootinholler Jun 2016 #45

I do not need to put words in anubodys mouth bravenak Jun 2016 #48

Sorry. You are wrong...again. Dawgs Jun 2016 #46

Yeah right bravenak Jun 2016 #50

Yeah noting the content of her speech is exactly defending Trump. Autumn Jun 2016 #49

Calling her anti Trump spee h the worst speech ever is kinda defending him bravenak Jun 2016 #51

Only in your world and a hell lot of people are to the left of her on war. Including Obama Autumn Jun 2016 #55

Bull bravenak Jun 2016 #60

Nonsense. No Bulls there. Obama is to the left of Hillary and so are many others. Hills is Autumn Jun 2016 #63

Whateves bravenak Jun 2016 #69

Whateves is right brav Autumn Jun 2016 #71

Get real. Is Trump to the left of her on war? brush Jun 2016 #72

Cannot make this shit up bravenak Jun 2016 #74

People make this shit up all the time. Autumn Jun 2016 #77

This too is boring and pointless to continue with you bravenak Jun 2016 #78

Nah I'm done, I find stretches boring as fuck all, Autumn Jun 2016 #80

Kudos to you . You read what I said. Autumn Jun 2016 #76

Defending Trump is really sad Gothmog Jun 2016 #57

Zero people are defending Trump. peace13 Jun 2016 #59

She took him down! bravenak Jun 2016 #61

This is only the beginning Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #64

I bet you are right bravenak Jun 2016 #66

leftwing zealots as far out there as right wing zealots beachbum bob Jun 2016 #65

I hate when they find common ground bravenak Jun 2016 #67

K&R! People really need to re-read Skinner's message. Bleacher Creature Jun 2016 #68

Fooled me too bravenak Jun 2016 #70

Pretty transparent. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #73

Yep bravenak Jun 2016 #75

If you expect neocon foreign policy to be embraced or even tolerated because TRUMP TheKentuckian Jun 2016 #82

^^**THIS**^^ Octafish Jun 2016 #133

It is disgusting treestar Jun 2016 #83

So sick bravenak Jun 2016 #85

Calling Hillary's speech lousy isn't the same thing as protecting Trump hellofromreddit Jun 2016 #84

Same thing in this case bravenak Jun 2016 #86

Repeating your claim doesn't make it true. hellofromreddit Jun 2016 #88

Sure it does bravenak Jun 2016 #89

Everything is not an "attack." Miles Archer Jun 2016 #90

False characterizations of others are often motivated by pure bias or bigotry. That's disgusting. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #93

Yeah. Just upthread somebody claims that Hillary is more hawkish than Trump bravenak Jun 2016 #112

Do Bernie supporters =Trump supporters these days? nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #94

I hope not. bravenak Jun 2016 #113

Many people are being willfully ignorant Haveadream Jun 2016 #96

+1 bravenak Jun 2016 #114

I think it is jealousy. Sanders couod not give such a speech. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #97

Many people envy her accomplishments bravenak Jun 2016 #115

As you say, it was a "kick ass anti Donald speech". panader0 Jun 2016 #98

Donald deserves to be hit all at once by the full force of the left bravenak Jun 2016 #117

I agree with Hillary supporter brooklynite on this one: Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #99

Yeah, no bravenak Jun 2016 #116

remember when criticism of Bush was characterized as defending Saddam? frylock Jun 2016 #100

Yep.. peace13 Jun 2016 #103

Conservatives are only capable of such binary thinking. frylock Jun 2016 #105

Good grief!!! Why not just stand against trump?!? bravenak Jun 2016 #118

Who is attacking her speech? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #102

Lots of people decided that her speech warrants attacking her rather than our mutual enemy bravenak Jun 2016 #119

We can disagree with both speeches on foreign policy without defending either. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #106

K&R. well said, Bravenak! lunamagica Jun 2016 #107

I think her speech kicked Trumps ass bravenak Jun 2016 #120

Hillary needs to bang that drum often Zambero Jun 2016 #108

I agree. I stand with her against Trump and his vile nature bravenak Jun 2016 #111

Spinning like a top. B Calm Jun 2016 #129

There is no defense MFM008 Jun 2016 #130

It was a great speech, there will be more speeches, it is worth a second listen Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #131