Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Jonathan Turley: Hillary Is The New Nixon [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)69. When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.
"They have pillaged the world. When the land has nothing left for men who ravage everything, they scour the sea. If an enemy is rich, they are greedy; if he is poor, they crave glory. Neither East nor West can sate their appetite. They are the only people on earth to covet wealth and poverty with equal craving. They plunder, they butcher, they ravish, and call it by the lying name of 'empire'. They make a desert and call it 'peace'." -- Publius Cornelius Tacitus, a historian of the Roman Empire
SOURCE (disturbing imagery):
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She may never have to hit her Watergate. If Nixon had done what he did today, I have my doubts
bjo59
Jun 2016
#37
we only have a couple more weeks to "fall in line". I thought Dems were supposed to "fall in love"
corkhead
Jun 2016
#32
so are you saying Hillary is so weak a candidate that she cannot withstand criticism?
azurnoir
Jun 2016
#51
Don't rely on me. Go to the Wikipedia article on Turley and read the list of his more prominent
Tal Vez
Jun 2016
#20
I heard someone else say the same thing. The whole missing 18 Minutes thing has a ring to it.
Gregorian
Jun 2016
#5
Yes he did! However, after Turley attacked Sotomayor's intelligence, Keith dumped him.
emulatorloo
Jun 2016
#55
I remember when DU threw him under the bus. Funny how we end up chewing up and
leeroysphitz
Jun 2016
#72
Um...no.....Turley's never been liberal. Pro impeachment, works for House Repubs.
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#62
Turley? Respected legal scholar? Um, no. Maybe he sounds smart-like on the Tee-Vee
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#58
And wasn't he the guy who attacked Thurgood Marshall's legacy for no fucking reason whatsoever
Number23
Jun 2016
#66
Suppose he might be "rightwing" if Hilary was "leftwing". But she's not.
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#19
no, he's permanently on board since John Boehner hired him to sue Barack Obama nt
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#49
Similar to an article I read about her surrounding herself with "yes" people. Doesn't want dissent.
EndElectoral
Jun 2016
#33
Turley works for the House Republicans. So he fits right in with the other
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#47