Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: We always hear about the 3 million+ voters for HRC. [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,740 posts)25. Well
"Those "massive crowds" didn't do him much good at the voting booth, did they?
Playing small venues seemed to work out well for one of the candidates, huh."
"Just had to set the record straight. Wouldn't want you to be under some kind of illusion. "
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lol. See, someone suggested caucus count for two. But they just do not draw enough people. I said,
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#1
There's also the scenario where Hillary is removed from the primary altogether.
LuvLoogie
Jun 2016
#2
considering that HRC supporters dismiss every state she doesn't win as not diverse, etc
roguevalley
Jun 2016
#39
You know what makes me sad? That people judge those of us who live in the southern states
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#3
This is false on its face, Weaver and Divine OPENLY ADMITTED to not competing in "southern states"
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#91
Bernie held large successful rallies in Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, New Orleans,
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#53
When 15,000 people come out to hear a person speak I consider that success, yes.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#60
Who got the votes? That seems to be the measure of success in elections.
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#61
'The votes' is brought up here constantly and it's all that matters to some, yes.
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#63
Rally attendance doesn't equal votes. The rock star type rallies don't seem to be working as well
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#66
Since you claim small, meet and greet affairs do well, how did that work for Obama?
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#68
When it comes to elections, no, crowds don't matter if those people don't then go vote.
moriah
Jun 2016
#117
Interesting the small crowd strategy. I've never seen a presidential candidate,
appalachiablue
Jun 2016
#118
Those "massive crowds" didn't do him much good at the voting booth, did they?
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#17
A lot of the south votes for the Republican candidate in the GE anyway though, right?
Seeinghope
Jun 2016
#16
Oh yes, I know that does not speak for all of you. I lived in Georgia for a few years so I totally
Seeinghope
Jun 2016
#109
How has Utah and Alaska voted in the GE ... You have no problem with those votes.
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#104
I have no problem with the individual votes. It is how the state goes in the GE that I am wondering
Seeinghope
Jun 2016
#110
My point is how are you going to question the southern states that HRC won ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#114
Are you saying that Democrats in southern states shouldn't have a voice in selecting the
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#108
No that really isn't what I am saying although in the GE when the state aligns with the the other
Seeinghope
Jun 2016
#112
Now THAT is important. It shows a lot of power since "the establishment" doesn't own the political
Seeinghope
Jun 2016
#113
Really? Hillary won Ohio, Pennsylvania, amd Florida. IMPORTANT swing states. NT
Adrahil
Jun 2016
#121
White man Sanders has an unlevel playing field with the woman in the race, lol.
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#6
Yes it was, suggesting a white man faces the unlevel playing field running against a woman.
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#77
Cause white men have all those obstacles placed in front of them, while women have the course clear
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#79
His policy positions are better than Hillary's. But 'boring' implies that it is about personality
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#37
My canvassing showed that in NY people voted her because she was the most qualified.
hrmjustin
Jun 2016
#38
If only there was a way for people to "record" a debate, so they could watch whatever sporting event
Nye Bevan
Jun 2016
#23
We can not know if the votes were counted fairly in many places for this primary.
stillwaiting
Jun 2016
#85
If Sanders wasn't known after spending a quarter of a century in Congress, what should that
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#29
You earn name recognition. It's not given. Sanders was unknown because he had zero
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#35
Yeah right' she engineered Hillary's name recognition and Sanders' obscurity. Did you think
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#36
Sanders Campaign's failure to tailor his message to appeal to Southern voters, most of them black,
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2016
#54
They're not counting the number of voters in the caucuses she isn't millions of votes ahead
onecaliberal
Jun 2016
#67
Where did thay COME from?? THAT'S what Matters? No, honey, MATH is what matters
LaydeeBug
Jun 2016
#75
And who is to blame if a person votes before researching the candidates?
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2016
#84
That was a part of it, but did you see those posts about how they count the votes?
pdsimdars
Jun 2016
#81
257 of the SDs worked with BS in Congress...and the majority of them are with Her.
Henhouse
Jun 2016
#90
No it DOESN'T matter where they came from, and it's offensive to suggest such a thing.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#99
There was a caucus in the Virgin Islands yesterday and there will be a primary in Puerto Rico today.
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2016
#111